Rodrigo

Periodista. De la Unión. De Valdivia. Amigo del cartel. Seguidor del Calcio. Hablo de fútbol y hago imágenes 💻 🎙️

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

[HILO 🧵]

¿Cómo se verían las camisetas de los equipos de Primera División del fútbol chileno si estuvieran 100% inspiradas en su escudo?

No soy diseñador pero solté mi creatividad para responder esta pregunta y aquí se las comparto con ustedes 👇

Unión Española 🔴🟡 1/16

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

Bastián Yáñez no está siendo menos que Olise en el Ohiggins vs Millonarios

[Latinometrics @LatamData]

CHILE | Anthropic selects Chile as the first Latin American host for its Claude Impact Lab to build AI tools for financial regulation.

(Diario Financiero)

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

como mierda sabe rutify que vivo en islandia ??? no entiendo como vinculan mi rut a eso si literal acá el rut no sirve de nada, jamás lo he ocupado

[Speculator @TheSpeculator0]

Iceland has perfected squeezing rich tourists for their money. Even as a dutchman i'm appalled / impressed

[El Diaz @SoyDaniloDiaz]

Cuando digo "si mal no recuerdo" o "si no me equivoco", solo estoy siendo amable a la hora de tener razón. Ni recuerdo mal, ni me equivoco.

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

me pasó EXACTAMENTE lo mismo, top 1 eventos que me dejaron traumado

[SonnyBoy🇺🇸 @gotrice2024]

This man called for an Uber to take him to the airport while traveling in Egypt. The price was 250 Egyptian pounds whose is about $4.83 cents.

The driver stops in the middle of the highway and now is demanding instead of the amount that was agreed on, that he wanted $250 USD instead of Egyptian pounds.

The driver is still refusing to drive, the problem is if the man gets out, the driver will more than likely take off and steal his luggage as well. Paying him more isn’t an option either because at this point he’s almost holding you hostage because he knows you don’t have many options, what would you do in this scenario?

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

@fenomenodelcolo La adrenalina del momento me imagino. Son muchas cosas pasando al mismo tiempo

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

@TomasGoldberg1 asi como van en un cuarto juicio le darán doble cadena perpetua

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

A Nicolás Zepeda le habían dado 28 años en el segundo juicio. Apeló para bajar la condena y ahora le dieron perpetua. Adoro los finales felices

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

Pasó el Tio Rene y dijo que la ministra Sedini no puede hablar tan como el pico

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

@rodri_escobar así es, es la nueva función que lanzaron ayer

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

Estoy probado Cowork de Claude y es una absoluta locura. Literalmente está haciendo mi trabajo mientras me preparo la once

[Carlitos Primavera 🌼 @CarlosSpring_]

“Buenas noches, porque son noches y además son buenas.”

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

jajajajajaj cierren por fuera, el mejor tuit del año

[Deportes Puerto Montt @DPMChile]

17' | Al igual que en marzo de 1866, los españoles no paran de atacar al Puerto (Montt)

#UEspañola 0️⃣ - 0️⃣ #PuertoMontt

#VamosPuerto

[Nav Toor @heynavtoor]

🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone.

And it's making you a worse person because of it.

Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would.

That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear.

It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on.

Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one.

The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started.

Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product.

This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens.

Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing.

You're right. They're wrong.

Even when the opposite is true.

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

Pablo Milad tiene un PLAN

[MARCA @marca]

🚨 Irán se baja del Mundial 🚨

Los ataques estadounidenses hacen que se planteen participar en la cita del próximo verano 😔

😓El combinado iraní tiene programados tres encuentros en territorio estadounidense

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

Everton juega tan mal que van 3-0 perdiendo y aún así su figura es el Nacho González

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

@SamsungMobile #stop

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

Han pasado 1938 días desde que Union ganó por última vez 5 partidos seguidos (21.10.20). El chascón United lleva recién 493, un novato

[Rodrigo @olavebe]

el mito de que los europeos son hediondos NO ES MENTIRA, no se lavan la raja y el transporte público siempre está horrible