LmL

Long time Conspiracy Theorist with a good track record. Living a humbled life, being thankful for the gifts of discernment and intuition I have been given.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@AwakenedOutlaw Can you do this using Baby Trump?

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@MissDeusVult @realMaalouf I agree 100%. Why haven't we arrested them for their practice of child marriage, statutory rape? And the health regulations with their slaughtering. And the security risks with their hijabs. And their Sharia law. Why are we allowing them to openly break our laws?

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@BGatesIsaPyscho I have been seeing these in North Central Oklahoma. It's been driving me crazy trying to figure out what they are.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@TrumpWarRoom @POTUS I guess she didn't take time to look at the gov website before she made that statment.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@MelissaRedpill @EricLDaugh Any idea what JFM stands for?

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@SuaveCEO_ @okcthunder @TheSuaveReport Can players accept less money to stay with a team? Asking for a friend. We will miss him and Wiggins.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@SantaSurfing @SecKennedy @DOJFraudDiv Why can't we just have the bad chemicals removed like they have in Europe? They already have the means to make their products without them.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@GordonGChang That is the same thing we did to the Native Americans.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@RealAF_Patriot I saw a post earlier that shows Graham was born in 1952. So was he 71, or 73?

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@eternalfaith4 @BGatesIsaPyscho Because the "frequencies" create the pattern. Chemtrails create the cloud. Think of it like the ripple on the pond when you throw a rock into it.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@RealAF_Patriot She looks awful! I saw an older picture of her recently. She was beautiful back then.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@x22Report110 @TonySeruga The problem is they hide behind religion when it's not religion. If they don't assimilate, they need to leave.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@CAlmanza1007 I like it! It makes him look serious! Like him getting his mind set for the season.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@MailaMariaRosa Very well said. You are a wise young lady.

[Paul White Gold Eagle @PaulGoldEagle]

THE REAL REASON MARIJUANA WAS MADE ILLEGAL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DRUGS. IT'S ABOUT PAPER, FUEL, AND PLASTIC.
In 1937, the Marihuana Tax Act criminalized cannabis in the United States. The man behind it: Harry Anslinger — head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. His primary funders: Andrew Mellon, the DuPont family, and William Randolph Hearst. Three men with billions invested in industries that hemp would destroy overnight.
DuPont had just patented nylon — a synthetic fiber meant to replace rope and textiles. Hemp produces stronger fiber at a fraction of the cost. Hearst owned millions of acres of timber forests feeding his newspaper empire. Hemp produces four times more paper per acre than trees — and grows in four months instead of twenty years. Mellon — the Treasury Secretary — was DuPont's primary banker. Three men. Three monopolies. One plant that threatened all of them.
They didn't ban a drug. They banned a competitor.
⟁
Hemp was legal for 10,000 years. George Washington grew it. Thomas Jefferson grew it. The Declaration of Independence was drafted on hemp paper. The word "canvas" comes from "cannabis." The sails that crossed oceans were hemp. The ropes that rigged every ship were hemp. The first Levi's jeans were hemp. Henry Ford built a car body from hemp plastic in 1941 — stronger than steel, lighter than fiberglass — and designed it to run on hemp fuel.
Popular Mechanics published an article in February 1938 — one month after criminalization — calling hemp "The New Billion Dollar Crop." A decorticator machine had just been invented that made hemp processing economically viable at industrial scale for the first time. The plant was about to replace timber, petroleum-based plastics, cotton, and fossil fuels — simultaneously. In one harvest cycle.
The timing wasn't coincidence. The ban came precisely when technology made hemp commercially viable enough to destroy petroleum, timber, cotton, and synthetic chemical industries in a single generation. They didn't ban it because it was dangerous. They banned it because it was about to make them irrelevant.
⟁
Anslinger's campaign was built on racism. He testified to Congress that marijuana "makes darkies think they're as good as white men." He claimed it caused Black men to look at white women. He planted stories in Hearst's newspapers about "reefer madness" — Mexican immigrants and Black jazz musicians driven to violence by the plant. The propaganda wasn't medical. It was racial. Because racial fear was the fastest path to legislation in 1937 America.
The word "marijuana" itself was a strategic choice. The plant was known as cannabis or hemp — familiar, American, useful. Anslinger rebranded it with a Mexican-Spanish name to associate it with immigrant populations. Most congressmen who voted for the ban didn't know they were criminalizing hemp — the plant that built their country. They thought they were banning a foreign drug used by minorities.
Today, the petroleum industry generates $3.3 trillion annually. The pharmaceutical industry: $1.4 trillion. The timber industry: $600 billion. The synthetic textile industry: $800 billion. One plant — growing in any climate, requiring no pesticides, producing fiber, fuel, food, plastic, paper, and medicine — threatens over $6 trillion in annual revenue. The ban was never about your health. It was about their income.
CODE: ANSLINGER-1937 / DUPONT-NYLON / HEARST-TIMBER / FORD-HEMP-CAR-1941
Henry Ford built a car from hemp plastic that ran on hemp fuel in 1941. One plant replaces petroleum, timber, cotton, and pharmaceuticals. They didn't ban a drug. They banned the end of their empire.
♟
Hemp makes paper, fuel, plastic, textiles, and medicine. It was legal for 10,000 years. They banned it the same year DuPont patented nylon. It was never about drugs. It was about protecting $6 trillion in industries one plant could replace.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@GadSaad There is already a solution. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 313(a)(4) (8 U.S.C. § 1424(a)(4) and Section 316(a)(3) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1427(a)(3) this situation already bars them from Naturlization. It just needs to be inforced.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@CaptKylePatriot Wonder how long those $100 bills have been there? Which NGO did they come from?

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@BGOnTheScene Is it even possible for this many people to have immigrated and become naturalized? I say it's time to check each one's true status and deport where warranted.

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@JoeySalads Here is one that will be helpful to a small rural 2 year college.
https://t.co/jJ30jJ7nVz

[LmL @OldIndigoChild]

@JustTheNews @SecScottBessent We need to add Islam to the list.