@John_Reddick@JohnBradfordYT@ChenG03721819@ztrussell Oh for Christ’s sake (no pun intended). It is an adaptation of Lewis. Just as, say, Hawks’s Big Sleep is an adaptation of Chandler despite junking the last third of the book and taking it in an entirely different direction.
@ScottMcCreaWest The Godfather, The French Connection, Jaws, Psycho, Die Hard, Vertigo, Rosemary’s Baby, Dr Strangelove, Children of Men, Now Voyager, The Shawshank Redemption… I could go on all day.
@hyrumt@ChenG03721819@ztrussell For fuck’s sake. That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying it’s no more silly for a lion to talk with a woman’s voice than for a lion to simply talk. Both are clearly deviations from the norm.
@LeftistDad@FuascailtCait@FAIreland I don’t know if you’re really this thick. But nobody is suggesting the genocide *itself* would compare (or surely exceed) any dark day for Dublin. They’re saying merely playing a football match would not compare with Dublin’s darkest days.
@aaraam_pasand Jesus Christ, not this again. Being one of the most popular shows ever on TV does not translate into a “cult following”. Indeed it could be seen as the precise *opposite* of a “cult following”.
@ChenG03721819@ztrussell I don’t think the whole thing is silly. I think it is insane to think a lion talking is not silly but a lion taking with a woman’s voice is. “There is such a thing as naturalism”? PARDON? Of course there is. And Narnia could hardly be farther from naturalism. It’s not Ken Loach
@ChenG03721819@ztrussell I’m sorry, but it is bizarre to be relaxed about an animal talking and not relaxed about an apparently male animal talking with an apparently female voice.
@ztrussell FFS. Everyone who is “excited for” this does not think that. I am excited it and do not hope it expect that to happen. I hope this helps get this straw man out of your head.