Last month we saw the creation of the new token standard β ERC404!
Now, there are already a couple of tens of ERC404s with a 300M+ market cap, which can be easily applied in RWAs, Gaming, NFT liquidity providing, etc.π
"Reputable company", but the report is a bit shitty I think, all findings are super overrated and poorly described. Can't really understand how the biggest protocols have paid a ton for this report. π€
https://t.co/jipsqQDEdC
Understanding a complex protocol requires an approach that goes beyond just reading documentation. To gain a comprehensive grasp of the underlying idea, consider the following:
- Thorough Documentation Review
- Unit Test Analysis
- Internal Technical Specifications
- Flowcharts
What if the protocol that you audited gets hacked? π§¨
I'm thinking about how would I proceed in such a situation and can't think of a proper scenario.
While carefully reading past reports, I often see how two totally different reports of the same vulnerability are paid equally. The better one in most cases includes a detailed PoC.
Interested to see a behind-the-scenes on a full private solo smart contract audit? From initial contact to final report delivery, including code cleanup, security assessment and more π€π§΅