"Why didn't this grieving widow condemn her husband, announce she secretly hated him the whole time, and say she was rededicating his organization to the cause of his enemies? That is the only way I would feel sympathy for her, because I'm a very Good Person."
14x repeat offender stabs woman in the neck for being white:
"he was clearly mentally ill... can't you see he's hurting 🥺"
Widow upset at people who shot her husband and celebrated his death:
"wow! what a weird bitch! 🤣"
I asked someone who is fine with Charlie Kirk's assassination how they would feel if I was murdered for my beliefs
"Well, that would be different, you don't talk about them"
Oh, I see
Yeah. Charlie Kirk did say, "I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights."
Here's the full quote:
“Yeah, it's a great question. Thank you. So, I'm a big Second Amendment fan but I think most politicians are cowards when it comes to defending why we have a Second Amendment. This is why I would not be a good politician, or maybe I would, I don't know, because I actually speak my mind.
The Second Amendment is not about hunting. I love hunting. The Second Amendment is not even about personal defense. That is important. The Second Amendment is there, God forbid, so that you can defend yourself against a tyrannical government. And if that talk scares you — "wow, that's radical, Charlie, I don't know about that" — well then, you have not really read any of the literature of our Founding Fathers. Number two, you've not read any 20th-century history. You're just living in Narnia. By the way, if you're actually living in Narnia, you would be wiser than wherever you're living, because C.S. Lewis was really smart. So I don't know what alternative universe you're living in. You just don't want to face reality that governments tend to get tyrannical and that if people need an ability to protect themselves and their communities and their families.
Now, we must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty. Driving comes with a price. 50,000, 50,000, 50,000 people die on the road every year. That's a price. You get rid of driving, you'd have 50,000 less auto fatalities. But we have decided that the benefit of driving — speed, accessibility, mobility, having products, services — is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road. So we need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You could significantly reduce them through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools. We should have a honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one.
You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am, I, I — I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.
So then, how do you reduce? Very simple. People say, oh, Charlie, how do you stop school shootings? I don't know. How did we stop shootings at baseball games? Because we have armed guards outside of baseball games. That's why. How did we stop all the shootings at airports? We have armed guards outside of airports. How do we stop all the shootings at banks? We have armed guards outside of banks. How did we stop all the shootings at gun shows? Notice there's not a lot of mass shootings at gun shows, there's all these guns. Because everyone's armed. If our money and our sporting events and our airplanes have armed guards, why don't our children?”
Many people smugly point out that Charlie said gun deaths are unfortunately worth it to keep the 2nd Amendment.
In the same breath, they’ll claim he was a fascist.
Not only did they not read the full quote - they don’t realize: the 2nd Amendment is the defense against fascism.
Charlie kirk was not ‘literally hitler’, hitler killed millions of people - Kirk Debated college kids
He is not comparable to George Floyd, Floyd was a violent criminal and a druggie, kirk was a Christian that debated college kids
He was not an extremist, far right, polarising.
HE LITERALLY JUST DEBATED COLLEGE KIDS
Charlie’s children will be raised with stories instead of memories, photographs instead of laughter, and silence where their father’s voice should have echoed.
Charlie Kirk’s life should serve as a symbolic reminder that compassionate awareness elevates family, love, and country.
Right now, millions of people are finding out you can become a magistrate judge in many states WITHOUT being a licensed lawyer — Teresa Stokes never passed the bar exam — fully empowered to let repeat criminal offenders roam the streets to murder innocents.
Utter lunacy.
Whether you agreed with him or not, Charlie Kirk is dead purely because some people didn't like what he had to say. That should outrage every single one of us.
The roommate of Laken Riley's killer just testified during his trial that they went to the Roosevelt Hotel together in September 2023 and received a taxpayer funded flight to Georgia.
Your government flew an illegal gang member to Georgia with your money -- where he then proceeded to brutally murder an innocent girl.
January 20th can't come soon enough.
Three young women.
Lives snuffed out by illegal aliens.
300 years before their time…
Due to Joseph Biden’s open border policies and due to George Soros DAs no bail bonds.
No protests.
No marches or riots.
No national outrage.
No media coverage.
#SayHerName #TakeOutAngerAtBallotBox