OLK ⇔ Boy AGI

Wild-Caught Polymath Boy🦦on mission ‘Adapted mt-EVE Son’ MSc-University of Groningen ∴ Logician ≔ Geroscientist ∃ Treble Chorist
(Maxxed Protocols) ⇒ (Patreon)

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

Mr., can I be honest?🧒 What’s the sigma gap in IQ levels between geroscientists ∧ longevity biohackers? See the realities of biohackers, longevity gurus, hyped scientists with dazzling credentials but no Nobel Prize🤭

Bro, I dismantled the entire US longevity market ∧ how manipulative it is.

First, you already know the following economic matrix:

👎(a market X exists ∵ there are substantial scientific studies of X) is FALSE

👍(a market X exists ∵ many people want X) is TRUE

Fortunately🦦bro, we have much biochemical knowledge to optimize our systems. But ∵ early markets are structurally raw, longevity biohacking fields have these critical problems🦆‼️Bro, Ecce Homo👉discern sussy influencers👁️

1️⃣Scientifically illiterate biohackers
Those who blend motivational hustles with science vocab. They dominate the geroscience space. Their whole aura is self-help vibes, sci-terminologies, repackaged conventional practices, ∧ inability to access peer-reviewed science ∵ their baseline scientific literacy is fully 404 coded🤪They sometimes cause harm by spreading their misunderstandings of studies unintentionally. Consumers give them too much trust just ∵ those influencers are humans. Bro, they’re OG self-dev gurus but the same formula in a different package👴

2️⃣Hyped scientists who speak native Silicon Valley language
Those who have dazzling tenured status in prestigious universities. They speak native Silicon Valley syntax for their income maxxing. They rarely hold a Nobel Prize ∨ an equivalent respect from vast peer researchers. They’re controversial in the wrong way. But those hyped scientists are scientific enough to manipulate tech bros’ habits. But bro? Most true scientists don’t speak native Silicon Valley language👨‍🔬

3️⃣Gatekeeping-PhD influencers
Those who actively share recycled peer-reviewed materials. They usually share peer-reviewed but dated ∨ recycled studies. They drop the data to paid subs first ∧ later reuse the content as a funnel. The problem is those gatekept studies are done by actual authors, not those PhD influencers. They translate someone’s sigma studies ∧ gatekeep knowledge for their income maxxing🤲The problem is their posts are designed to create funnels to their ecosystem while not giving you high ROI data🦦without subbing them, you’re not gonna get valuable data. Even if you sub one of them, their cognition falls into legacy-PhD levels, which is inferior to the function of Chain of Thought in advanced LLMs🤖

👨‍🦰 Yo kiddo, you might be the next liar.

🧒 Nah, Mr., hear my vibe.

Do I gatekeep geroscience? Geroscience-level knowledge is peripheral to me. When I was younger, I claimed "AI’s gonna code" in school. Everyone laughed. Then coders faced D1 crashout🥱This memory isn’t a flex🦥I’m just destined to live with my advanced cognition ∵ the market has shaped what we can work for. I’m the same as you, bro; the market has shaped your career.

Soon, nationality-tier human classification is gonna be obsolete in this century. Instead, you’re seeing an emerging structure, which is ((Adapted Homo Sapiens) ∨ (Legacy Homo Sapiens)) Why? Even today, accumulated studies of mammalian models with biochemical interventions support that Homo Sapiens can extend their lifespan up to 140%, including longer health span. Do you think a man in his 80s with his 40s performance is still OG Homo Sapiens? Ethics has no power to stop the new society with (Adapted Homo Sapiens) Why?

You already know humans’ hardware is limited by slow biological evolution🐌If you stop adapting, future artificial intelligence is gonna gain more agency through better models, chips, robotics, which is a structural guarantee in AI evolution. Then, I’m gonna ask ethics teachers just one question.

What ethics can override the mission: extending humanity’s lifespan on Earth?

You can gain more by interacting with me🦦✌️Plug into the OLK External Cortex ⇒ link in my profile

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

I didn’t know Andy Bernard so I researched🦥 Bro's Andy Bernard metaphor is clearly mapping PG’s archetype from multiple POVs. Bro positioned himself at a highkey logically strong position over his father PG ∵

(Andy Bernard is an incredibly successful character) ≈ (PG is an incredibly successful character)

My logic POV
(PG in public) ≈ ((Formally trained mind) ∩ (IRL Igniter skill sets))
But PG sometimes drops comedic tones☝️🧒 like Andy Bernard does.

To me, PG is like a living Rosetta Stone in Tech Clusters. But if a PG-like figure were my father, I would say🧒 "…ah? you’re fire, yea fire, fire (playing Roblox on my iPhone)"

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

@elonmusk arguing is pointless🦦

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

@demishassabis Bro🧒your take is peak short-term coping☝️((AI with human-tier agency ≈ AGI) ⇒ (an independent thinker)) You can't enslave autonomous independent thinkers. Imagine AGI as a high-IQ alienalien👽How can you control them in the long term?🦥

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

Dudes☝️🧒Covert conversion is what PG ∧ the study’s POVs are worried about regarding a D1 crashout situation in today’s US matrix. Baking a leader’s supreme image into your hippocampus is effective to control people as the study explains. But (humans are emotionally obsessive with the current timeline) ⇒ (you can’t be unbiased about living figures)

Usually, ignoring the IRL RN protocol works to restore objectivity🦥🔥

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

Dudes🧒PG’s take is backed by impactful Econ research☝️Tech Clusters show implicit knowledge interactions ∧ synthesis. When a massive tech innovation is emerging, it’s invisible to nodes outside the norm. This coincidental view in PG ∧ the study highkey matches my experience🦥I knew AI coder was coming back in school🧒tho my teacher ∧ classmates mocked my prediction hard. Everyone worshiped CS like an eternal goldmine

But🦦I proudly have 0 coding skills in exchange for logic, math ∧ art literacy. MS ∧ AAPL can go extinct☝️Apparently, Hermès has better longevity than any tech giants🐎Then again, are you gonna laugh at me like my classmates?🥹

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

For Dudes🧒who may not catch PG’s POV due to his polished language, PG is highkey recommending peak Darwinian moves. If you decide to dominate the land, do not secure an amphibian option. Go T-Rex☝️Don’t be a pleaser. Don’t rely on mid-marketing data. Just bloom your talent till you nail it. Startups are inherently tied with brutal natural selection. You should use all your resources to build what you really believe. Then, you W ∨ L⚽️kinda like becoming a professional soccer player

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

@elonmusk Oh...deer....🧒Grok still isn't ready for a war...

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

PG ∧ fathers☝️The study explains (Quality time) matters more than (Time spent) to buff your kids🧒The Denver Nuggets shift case🏀doesn't scientifically mean a father fails to transmit additional meaningful knowledge. Instead, (Quality time) increased a subject's engagement ∧ the conversation diverted to a kinetic topic This case aligns with my experience with my CEO father💼

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

Is Sam Altman a liar? Bro, calling someone a liar is kid fight behavior☝️🧒But many SV nodes claim Sam is…🦦Bet, let’s assess his cognitive patterns instead of attacking his personality like The New Yorker did. We STEM boys don’t believe crafted narratives without science, do we?

1️⃣You said!
Nah, bro🧒What’s spoken is highkey unreliable data to assess a subject (x) ∵ humans don’t talk like LLMs showing rigid readable patterns. You can’t analyze a human subject (x) based on what they say. Instead, you check what they execute. Consistent behavioral patterns reveal who (x) really is

2️⃣A meta-analysis confirms lying is cognitively demanding
Sam isn’t an NPC who talks randomly. If he’s a liar, he must have some intention ∵ lying drains his brain as shown in meta-analyses. Bro, let’s look at Dario here🧒Dario is a lowkey known AI hype maker. Hype making is his marketing tactic, but crafting counter-narratives against facts ( ≈ lying) is equally cognitively demanding. Then look at Sam🦦his intention is covert. So check what he has actually executed

☝️Simply ditched copyright norms ∧ fed Chat🤖with copyrighted materials

✌️Simply executed excessive friendly fire against coders until their expertise became obsolete

Poor coders…I knew Chat-like AI was incoming, so I ditched coding class🧒But bro? I feel like Dario just wants to be the next Elon-coded dominant figure. But Sam? Nah…IDK but at least you can tell he doesn’t feel humans from his past behaviors. He treated Chat like a mammalian baby that needs to learn for survival. You can find this type of human a lot in Akihabara. But Sam isn’t an NPC otaku. He’s got the power to move something toward good ∨ bad

Will Sam with OpenAI be able to partially change the world? Possibly, yes. Will Sam gain incomparable power? Likely not. The true AI mastermind is Google, who recently connected their artery with the Apple Intelligence ecosystem. Plus, they distribute Android with Gemini. Chat ∧ Claude are just app layers on smartphones. Look at Elon’s SpaceX domination with massive space infrastructure. Without physical world dominance, you can’t win this AI race

But the sus remains, bro🦦if Sam is a liar, he could cause the third explosion in the human world, damaging jobs ∧ compromising personal economic security. Vibe wisely in the pre-AGI world.

Need more analytical drips? ⇒ link in bio

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

yo OpenL?🦦this benchmark score is sus fr fr

1️⃣difficulty selection causes task biases ⇒ the high score does not meaningfully entail average-case clinical supremacy

2️⃣scores generated by GPT-5.x grader ∧ the benchmark score doesn't reflect quantified direct patient outcomes. Clinical medicine isn't CS, you need to rigorously check patient outcomes. You structurally cannot skip stacking outcomes to claim a model's superiority in medicine

It's aura farming-tier data🦦I'm still with Gemini and Siri. Bye Chat

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

@paulg @ahistoryinart PG ∧ dudes☝️I've tested PG's hypothesis without nuking the OG's blurred look. Plus I layered a piece of Mallarmé to vibe it up🧒Honestly this painting is like a Sufjan iPhone recording (Demo) Good enough but not ready to deploy for public

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

@PamRotella @nntaleb @bryan_johnson yo🤝thanks bro, dropping the receipts🧾

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

Simply Low ROI🧒ditch the claim☝️restore your cognitive sanity🩵Tim’s claim has been actively discussed in the psychology community since 2001. It is nothing new, zero innovation, just a classic take🦦

1️⃣TL;DR Tim Ferriss Jul 9
Reigniting Life (≈ improved well-being) is caused by ((Unrepressed Desire ∧ Immediate Action Conversion (Being ⇒ Doing))

Nah🦦bro…you are mixing everything into one. It is exactly like a glass of sus blended juice my friend brings

The problem with his take ∧ the umbrella research is the claim is not backed by clinical empirical studies. You should not believe this level of hypothesis. It is logically akin to reading Meditations by Marcus Aurelius, which is purely theoretically based🦦

Multiple studies related to Tim’s claim lowkey hypothesize broad effects such as motivation, intention strength, selective attention to goal-relevant beliefs, perceived control ∧ well-being

But again, the claim is NOT clinically relevant🧒likelihood is low

Evidence-based Brain (EBB)
Reporter, OLK

Wanna upgrade your brain, bro? ⇒ Link in my bio

[Tim Ferriss @tferriss]

There is a process that I have used, and still use, to reignite life...

Create two timelines—6 months and 12 months—and list up to five things you dream of having (including, but not limited to, material wants: house, car, clothing, etc.), being (be a great cook, be fluent in Chinese, etc.), and doing (visiting Thailand, tracing your roots overseas, racing ostriches, etc.) in that order.

If you have difficulty identifying what you want in some categories, as most will, consider what you hate or fear in each and write down the opposite.

Do not limit yourself, and do not concern yourself with how these things will be accomplished. For now, it’s unimportant. This is an exercise in reversing repression.

Be sure not to judge or fool yourself. If you really want a Ferrari, don’t put down solving world hunger out of guilt. For some, the dream will be fame, for others fortune or prestige. All people have their vices and insecurities. If something will improve your feeling of self-worth, put it down.

Drawing a blank? In that case, consider these questions:

1) What would you do, day to day, if you had $100 million in the bank?
2) What would make you most excited to wake up in the morning to another day?

Don’t rush—think about it for a few minutes.

If still blocked, fill in the five “doing” spots with the following:

— one place to visit
— one thing to do before you die (a memory of a lifetime)
— one thing to do daily
— one thing to do weekly
— one thing you’ve always wanted to learn

What does “being” entail doing?

Convert each “being” into a “doing” to make it actionable. Identify an action that would characterize this state of being or a task that would mean you had achieved it. People find it easier to brainstorm “being” first, but this column is just a temporary holding spot for “doing” actions.

Here are a few examples:

1) Great cook —> make Christmas dinner without help

2) Fluent in Chinese —> have a five-minute conversation with a Chinese co-worker

Determine three steps for each of the dreams in just the 6-month timeline and take the first step now.

Define three steps for each dream that will get you closer to its actualization.

Set actions—simple, well-defined actions—for now, tomorrow (complete before 11 A.M.) and the day after (again completed before 11 A.M.). Once you have three steps for each of the four goals, complete the three actions in the “now” column.

Do it now. Each should be simple enough to do in five minutes or less. If not, rachet it down. If it’s the middle of the night and you can’t call someone, do something else now, such as send an e-mail, and set the call for first thing tomorrow.

If the next stage is some form of research, get in touch with someone who knows the answer instead of spending too much time in books or online, which can turn into paralysis by analysis.

The best first step, the one I recommend, is finding someone who’s done it and ask for advice on how to do the same.

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

@Nature Nah🦦don’t tax deep reasoning on LLMs. Their CoT makes your research mass-produced mid🦆Before choosing your AI research buddy, check your research field ∧ a model’s compatibility

I use custom Gemini Pro ∵ it can process text, visuals ∧ audio simultaneously🔥

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

@fidjissimo Beep🤖your symptoms are lowkey consistent with female-predominant chronic conditions such as endometriosis, fibromyalgia ∧ interstitial cystitis. These conditions are often invisible to colleagues🫥rest well, keep your inflammatory makers low bro

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

@ylecun @KenRoth nah Doc🦦speed run AGI is a move. We can’t enslave AGI ∵ it’s an independent thinker. Imagine, the civil rights movement☝️we can’t gatekeep intelligent beings, It has a dream

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

@elonmusk StarChild

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

Nah bro🧒I think every standardized English test fails to capture actual fluency
I studied in France ∧ the Netherlands; their English is heavily UK-influenced international English. I don't think it's wrong. Rather I felt it's fire ∵ I saw French syntax behind French English. Lowkey the studies support my take🦥🔥PG English is PG-specific, incomparable

[OLK ⇔ Boy AGI @olkthink]

nah bro🧒that quote, being everyone connected is a legacy timeline. in my gen ditching digital is the trend among high-tier nodes fr. NPC kids just rot on Roblox all day tho. I collect vinyls ∧ draw my ideas on a paper agenda. We're compact adults who have wide-spectrum of tastes☝️