On_A_List_Somewhere

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

Do you understand how statistics work? Notice how they always say “the highest increase on record” well that “record” is very short. How long have they been recording global temperatures ? Few hundred years ? I have to explain this all the time so sorry to anyone that reads my rebuttals, but in statistics you have sample size which would be “the record” they’re referring to, and you have population size which would be the entire age of the planet. The sample size “Recorded Temperature Data Over a few hundred years” isn’t a big enough sample of a 5 billion year old planet. It’s worthless data for making predictions. Im sure you’ve read about ice ages. And then they ended? Meaning the planet’s temperature dropped and then rose again all on it’s own with no help from us humans. And oh by the way, a warm planet is WAY easier to live in than a cold one….

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

Haha… get your PHD from a Cracker Jacks Box? Weather isn’t steady, never has been. It’s cyclical. Hence ice ages and warming periods. If oceans were really going to rise do you think any bank or insurance company in existence would loan money or insure anything within walking distance of the ocean?

Hurricane behavior changes? Haha… we’ve been tracking hurricanes for how long? Lets be nice and say 300 years. In statistics that would be your sample size, and the population size would be the age of the earth, so what? 5 billion years old. So your sample size is absolutely useless for predicting behavior on a planet that is 5 billion years old.

Even ice core data doesn’t agree with your sides narrative.
Your models are bad and your data is bad so your predictions are worthless.

You guys now have a religion that takes more faith to believe in than Jesus.

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

Well I guess we can clearly see that the Catholic Church will welcome the “aliens” when they arrive with open arms. The Monsignor was 100% correct. Think about this one… “For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect." (Matthew 24:24) In my humble opinion that great deception will be the so called “aliens.”

Now that being said I don’t think of demons as fallen angels. Demons are lower than fallen angels. Demons are the disembodied spirit remains of the nephilim. Beings that were half angelic and half human. The angelic side being more spiritual ie extra dimensional than physical. So when they died their physical human body died but their spirits remained as they couldn’t go anywhere else, they’re trapped on earth till God throws them into the Lake of Fire.

So aliens aren’t going to be extraterrestrial, they’re going to be extra dimensional.

Imagine if you will….que Twilight Zone music, tomorrow these “aliens” show up and tell the world that they’re our creators. How many people including Christians would believe them? A lot! And clearly the Catholic Church will.

So Monsignor wasn’t totally correct in saying the “aliens” are demons, but he’s on the right track.

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

@GeneralMCNews Link to report?

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

The paid for science is crystal clear. We paid a lot of scientists to prove anthropogenic climate change and they did. Job well done. Oh wait, that’s not how science works.

Explain to me this? What ended the last ice age? Humans? What caused the last ice age? Humans?
Is is easier to live during periods of cooling or warming? Did ice ages force people to leave continents in the past?
Why did the Norse arrive in Greenland in the 10th century and vanish by the 15th? Humans?

What’s the #1 greenhouse gas by a HUGE margin that yall ignore? What percentage of greenhouse gas is made up of CO2 if you include water vapor?

Is weather cyclical? Is temperature cyclical? Are solar minimums and solar maximums cyclical?

Did the founder of the Weather Channel, who originally invented the idea of global warming, later change his mind?

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

@TaraBull Tech is a few years old…

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

The irony of you lefties thinking MAGA supporters are dumb is funny. You’re ignorance, or just flat refusal to believe that politicians are corrupt and are incapable of orchestrating scenarios that seemingly prove their narratives true, is akin to cult like behaviors. You watch propaganda or read propaganda and you believe it. How many times has the press been wrong? Since when in history has the press picked a political side, and then do everything in thier power to protect that side? In the 80’s journalism was at least sneakily biased. Now they’re just a propaganda arm of the lefty globalists. They tell you what to think, how to think, they dictate your morality and teach you what virtues they want you to have. It’s called “programming” for a reason I guess. So I guess I’d rather be dumb, than smart and ignorant of the facts. Can have all the brains in the world but if you blindly believe everything you’re told or read than what good is that intelligence. And maybe you’re confusing intelligence with a good memory. Intelligence is critical thinking and a mind that is always skeptical about everything. I know very intelligent people that aren’t educated and I know a lot of educated people that are great at regurgitating facts but don’t have the mind or intellect to come to facts on their own. That is seemingly the left right now.

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

@specialopsmag Still using tail rotors, lame.

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

30 to 80 if you don’t include leveling costs and ALL the additional infrastructure to make it work. Cradle to grave nuclear power density, especially if you could remove non safety related government regulations, blows it away. The reason new ones are so expensive is because of regulations and law suits that fight them getting built. Environmental licensing delays, etc. Get rid of the red tape, keep the safety standards, and nuclear is WAY more efficient and takes up WAY less space.

Fear is what keep’s nuclear power stagnant. And the new nuclear power technologies like pebble bed reactors or thorium reactors are incredibly safe technology’s. The real reason that you don’t want cheap energy is because you don’t want population blooms. So you deceive people with this ecological myth that green energy is going to save the planet, and yes sure your costs are going to go up but hey you’re saving the planet. If someone invented cheap clean energy tomorrow you would suppress the technology because you don’t want population growth.

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

Its fine till they decide YOU make too much and they come after your pay. It’s like in college when you and a few other students study your ass off and get A’s and the rest of the class doesn’t. Then at the end of year the teacher says “well most of the class has C’s and a fee have “D’s, but if we redistribute the A students and take them down to B students and give their excess to the D students then they become C students and nobody fails and I look better as a teacher because my whole class passes.”
Exactly the same thing.

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

Uhhh let me get this right. The earth creates an organic element called Uranium. Basically a rock that when put close to another similar rock creates heat. We add another organic element known as water and we get steam. Steam builds pressure which we use to spin generators to make electricity. Doesn’t get much greener than that.

The problem is fear and too much regulation driving the cost of nuclear energy higher than it needs to be.

Looking at new nuclear energy technologies as if they’re the same as at the dawn of nuclear power is very ignorant. Like looking at a new modern vehicle with all of its safety systems, crumple zones and airbags and still thinking it’s a car built in the 60’s.

New nuclear technologies are walk-away safe. Meaning even if you lose all the active cooling systems and just turn the key off and walk away, they can’t melt down. This has been proven numerous times. The Chinese run these safety tests periodically where they shut off the cooling and monitor the system and they don’t go critical because they can’t. They have built in passive safety. Example, Pebble Bed Reactors.

Deregulate while maintaining necessary safety protocols will go a long way towards making nuclear power the cheapest and greenest energy there is.

If I were building a datacenter Id be jumping through the hula-hoops now to get a Toshiba 4S system installed.

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

Keep seeing posts about the wealthy not paying taxes. Here’s your breakdown. Who doesn’t pay taxes?

• Top 1% (AGI ≥ $675,602; ~1.53 million returns):
Share of total AGI: 20.6%
Share of total income taxes paid: 38.4%
Average tax rate: 26.3%
Average taxes paid: ~$537,909

• Top 5% (AGI ≥ $272,209):
Share of total AGI: 36.4%
Share of total income taxes paid: 59.3%
Average tax rate: 23.0%

• Top 10% (AGI ≥ $187,608):
Share of total AGI: 47.6%
Share of total income taxes paid: 70.5%
Average tax rate: 20.9%

• Top 25% (AGI ≥ $105,604):
Share of total AGI: 68.5%
Share of total income taxes paid: 86.3%
Average tax rate: 17.8%

• Top 50% (AGI ≥ $53,801):
Share of total AGI: 87.7%
Share of total income taxes paid: 96.7%
Average tax rate: 15.6%

• Bottom 50% (AGI < $53,801; ~76.5 million returns):
Share of total AGI: 12.3%
Share of total income taxes paid: 3.3%
Average tax rate: 3.7%

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

@GunnelsWarren So what you’re saying is Musk would have lost money under a Harris presidency and that’s a good thing?

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

@Mollyploofkins If Trump cured cancer you’d bitch about all the scientists he put out of business. TDS is real.

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

@MiaForTrump Hello Nancy Pelosi.

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

In statistics you have population size and sample size. In this example you’ve posted, thats the sample size, 175 years. The population size is an estimated 4.5 BILLION YEARs. So…. Your sample size isn’t representative of anything. It’s WAY too small. You cherry picked a time frame where the temps rose, but if you go farther back you’ll see that’s it’s cyclical. Temps rise and fall. Remember the ice ages? Planet warmed up all on its own to end those and cooled on its own to start those. Trust me when I say global warming is WAY BETTER than global cooling.
You true believers might as well start a religion. Takes more faith to believe your garbage science.

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

@allenanalysis @grok @grok is this a complete resolution of structural issues? What about ongoing fiscal pressures and future fiscal deficits?

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

@allenanalysis @grok is this statement true? Does NYC now have a budget deficit of zero?

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

@grok @allenanalysis @Grok is it law they they have to balance the budget every year?

[On_A_List_Somewhere @onalistsomwhere]

Completely wrong. The problem is cultural. And until you understand that it doesn’t matter how much money you throw at the problem it’s not going to get better. Democrat social welfare programs have made these people comfortable in their poverty and have rewarded them for being so. Explain to me how a nice expensive school building is going to motivate kids to want to learn. You removed all discipline from the school system and you protect the bad teachers with unions so the education problem is of your own making.

Until you make poverty uncomfortable people will not seek to find themselves a way out of it. And until you create a culture in those communities that rewards hard work and scholastic ability you’re fighting an uphill battle. After all its your side that has convinced these people that they can’t excel or make their own lives better without government intervention because the game is rigged against them. Truth be known you want them reliant on you and you don’t want them self reliant because they’ll probably wisen up and realize that they’ve been kept poor in order to guarantee your side votes. After all Democrats have been promising the same garbage ideas for the past 80 years and yet these people are still impoverished. Maybe your ideas don’t work. Or maybe it’s true what Malcom X said. The liberal is worse than the conservative because they willingly use the poor as a Political football.