onchainsnitch

🕵️‍♂️ Tracking Solana’s sussiest wallets & KOLs 🚨 Chain don’t lie. 👾 Cybersecurity engineer turned On-chain analyst

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

I queried those wallets on dune for the last 30 days. It appears that the side wallets front ran the main wallet around 10/15% of the times. Most of the times they were actually buying after the main wallet. The tokens overlap is 99% on one wallet and 93% on the other. Found 5/10 other wallets through another query, which appear to have around 60% overlap. I haven’t looked into them though, and can’t confirm they’re actually euris side wallets

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@0xBossman Yeah every comment section it’s always the same people 💀

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@zachxbt @loshmi It would have been a little different in my opinion because through euristics you could still find those wallet clusters without “insider data” as everything is on chain

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@nursexxl @Polymarket @PolymarketTrade It’s not about the chain, it’s about the environment

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@x0yabun Definitely didn’t keep up with the hype

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

You’re telling me @WheresBroox’s only “crime” was pulling KOL secondary wallets from Axiom?

Sure, no company should allow it, but those KOLs have been reusing the exact same wallets for years.

The data he grabbed was literally one Dune query away.

How is this suddenly a “groundbreaking attack”? 😂

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

Honestly by how it was presented it seemed like much more of a big deal. I literally excluded it being axiom as it would have been the only vector for “insider trading” (although it’s not), apart from Frontrunning which would have been caught way earlier. My bad for not doing on chain analysis before entering 💀 it was literally right before our eyes days before

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@loshmi He hasn’t moved the tokens yet. I will update if he does something.

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@bubblemaps @WheresBroox What tool do you use to create the graph of the transactions flow? @bubblemaps

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@NontanaTon82490 I was thinking moonshot, bitget, mexc or upbit

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

Are you sure that those crazy bets on Polymarket regarding Axiom on ZachXBT investigation aren’t using multiple side wallets to open contrary position to lure people into believing they’re insiders? Doesn’t cut it for me. I don’t see how axiom could possibly be the correct guess

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@devininsider Actual insiders aren’t so easy to spot. They’d use multiple wallets. I just regret entering when it was still 85 cents

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@solgoodman Moonshot or some CEX

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@radbro Been smoking lucky strike eclipse for a while. Most people that I suggested them to stuck to them

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@0xRiver8 It’s probably going to be some minor CEX. I can’t see a terminal involved into “insider trading”. What can they do apart from front running, which would have been caught a LONG time ago? They can see the multi wallets network, but is it even immoral to copy actual insiders?

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@CarOnPolymarket @0xtarzan1999 @zachxbt Binance and Coinbase don’t make much sense as Zach said it could be underwhelming. Maybe MEXC (doubt it could be considered underwhelming), upbit or moonshot

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@devininsider Wish I could enter right now. Really makes no sense. If you had been front running for a year we would have caught up way before

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@gcrtrd @devininsider When to list a coin for example, which alters price, especially with major CEXes

[onchainsnitch @onchainsnitch]

@gcrtrd @devininsider Correct, but it’d mean that they are profiting off of other people’s insider plays technically, even if they were to abuse those connections, they aren’t technically manipulating anything and they are not insiders themselves. With a CEX it’s different, because they decide