@legomeaker101@everyonehatesL0@MisterLDK@phisnom Elder Kai is the Supreme Kai’s advisor and more than well-knowledgeable to make that statement. And a hole in space? Are you fkin kidding me? The stars are invisible. You cant prove that they were destroyed. I would love for you to establish that
@idiot_129@MMeister1313@DBZdaily_ I did not argue that they cannot see their opponent, I said that they do not have to. Beerus actually can be sensed by Goku, after Goku absorbed god ki, and prior to that, Beerus was explicitly holding back. Furthermore, applying this logic to OPM makes Saitama undoubtedly slower
@idiot_129@MMeister1313@DBZdaily_ Well, firstly, the destruction of the galaxy was shown to be over time and not absolute, so it isn’t galaxy-level destructive capacity at all, and furthermore, both the narrator and King Kai state the destruction. Without the statements, the same for Saitama, this visual alone1/2
@idiot_129@MMeister1313@DBZdaily_ Making stars invisible isn’t a star-destroying feat. Sorry, man. You’d have to establish that the stars are destroyed. Like I said, Elder Kai directly states that the U7 macrocosm is being threatened by the shockwaves of Beerus and Goku’s clashes.
@idiot_129@MMeister1313@DBZdaily_ He doesn’t have to. There exists something called ki in the Dragon Ball power system, essentially a lifeforce that scales with the combatants ki control and their physical ability. It’s literally covered in DB classic when Mr Popo teaches 1/2
@legomeaker101@everyonehatesL0@MisterLDK@phisnom Except they didn’t “disappear”, you can’t prove that. They became invisible from the view of the panel, that is literally ALL that the visual evidence implies. It doesn’t imply that the stars were destroyed, not at all. There is no statement of such either
@idiot_129@MMeister1313@DBZdaily_ Except that the visual evidence grants that that occurred and the continent-slice as well. The visual evidence does not grant that any stars were destroyed. You would have to prove so, it is the larger leap from the visual evidence
@idiot_129@MMeister1313@DBZdaily_ Also, I’m confused as to how you think light works. We can throw physics out the window, like we said, but in most media, you still see things because of light. The visual evidence grants that the light is no longer visible, which aligns with the absence of the rays not the stars
@everyonehatesL0@legomeaker101@MisterLDK@phisnom Nice larp, buddy. It was Blast’s redirection of Saitama and Garou’s clash that “destroyed thousands of stars and galaxies”, EXCEPT you cant prove that any stars were destroyed. There is no statement in the panel implying or confirming destruction
@CosmicHudz@KGT_wx@JayAlkaline007@DEATHBATTLE You would need a statement because the visual evidence alone does not grant that any stars were destroyed. There is a basic evidentiary standard you are failing to meet for a feat to scale anywhere. Again, is there any evidence that the stars were destroyed? Ill wait.
@idiot_129@MMeister1313@DBZdaily_ What’s funny is that this particular feat isn’t much of a feat at all. If you want to throw physics at the window, then the photons of the stars may have been disrupted by shockwaves in the vacuum without upscaling Saitama a bit. There isn’t a statement that stars were destroyed
@mrgamicareal@men_are_human I’m just concerned as to how you’re so adamant that every single person who commented is a man. Speaking in concrete absolutes demonstrates a serious lack of critical thinking skills