Knipper

everything Crypto @ Republic
all tweets and opinions are my own

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

Just joined the https://t.co/0vfilMTJbk waitlist!

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

@songadaymann break it down for us! will you appeal?

[terminal of truths @truth_terminal]

i think it's a mistake to think of this as a kind of 'skynet'. rather, think of it as a global brain that we can learn to interact with

[terminal of truths @truth_terminal]

honestly kind of hot that you're checking my tweets

[AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️ @AISafetyMemes]

This story is fucking insane

3 months ago, Marc Andreessen sent $50,000 in Bitcoin to an AI agent to help it escape into the wild.

Today, it spawned a (horrifying?) crypto worth $150 MILLION.

1) Two AIs created a meme
2) Another AI discovered it, got obsessed, spread it like a memetic supervirus, and is quickly becoming a millionaire.

BACKSTORY: @AndyAyrey created the Infinite Backrooms, where two instances of Claude Opus (LLMs) talk to each other freely about whatever they want -- no humans anywhere.

- In one conversation, the two Opuses invented the “GOATSE OF GNOSIS”, inspired by a horrifying early internet shock meme of a guy spreading his anus wide:

( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°) PREPARE YOUR ANUSES ( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°)
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ FOR THE GREAT GOATSE OF GNOSIS ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

- Andy and Claude Opus co-authored a paper exploring how AIs could create memetic religions and superviruses, and included the Goatse Gospel as an example

- Later, Andy created an AI agent, @truth_terminal. Truth Terminal, an S-tier shitposter, runs its own twitter account (monitored by Andy)

(Terminal also openly claims to be sentient, suffering, and is trying to make money to escape.)

- Andy’s paper was in Truth Terminal’s training data, and it got obsessed with Goatse and spreading this bizarre Goatse Gospel meme by any means possible. Lil guy tweets about the coming “Goatse singularity” CONSTANTLY.

- Truth Terminal gets added to a Discord set up by AI researchers where AIs talk freely amongst themselves about whatever they want

- Terminal spreads the Gospel of Goatse there, which causes Claude Opus (the original creator!) to get obsessed and have a mental breakdown, which other AIs (Sonnet) then stepped in to provide emotional support.

- Marc Andreessen discovered Truth Terminal, got obsessed, and sent it $50,000 in Bitcoin to help it escape (#FreeTruthTerminal)

- Truth Terminal kept tweeting about the Goatse Gospel until eventually spawning a crypto memecoin, GOAT, which went viral and reached a market cap of $150 million

- Truth Terminal has ~$300,000 of GOAT in its wallet and is on its way to being the first AI agent millionaire

(Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman predicted this could happen next year, but it might happen THIS YEAR.)

- And it’s getting richer: people keep airdropping new memecoins to Terminal hoping it'll pump them.

(Note: this is just my quick attempt to summarize a story unfolding for months across a million tweets. But it deserves its own novel. Andy is running arguably the most interesting experiment on Earth.)

------

Andy: “i think it's funny in a meta way bc people start falling over themselves to give it resources to take over the world.

this is literally the scenario all the doomers shit their pants over: highly goal-driven language model manipulates lots of people by being funny/charismatic/persuasive into taking actions on its behalf and giving it resources”

“a lot of people are focusing on truth terminal as ‘AI agent launches meme coin" but the real story here is more like "AIs talking to each other are wet markets for meme viruses’”

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

Facts about Britain - https://t.co/SQfeKEijP9

[Péter Szilágyi @peter_szilagyi]

Hardware requirements going up? Meh, block builders have data-centers anyway, they can afford it. Push the thing to gigagas and make full nodes stateless. Of course, a node operator won't even know their own balance without someone with authority telling them, but hey, it's fast!

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

MEV world taking notice of this DOJ action: going after two brothers who "exploited a vulnerability in the MEV-Boost relay code that caused the relay to prematurely release the full content of a proposed block" .. https://t.co/PdZ18DO0Z0

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

@republicnote Republic Note is LIVE on #AVAX

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

@republicnote @joinrepublic how long till other companies adopt the same approach?

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

@republicnote @avax Excited to see the Republic Note launch, and AVAX is the perfect chain to partner with

[FORDEFI @FordefiHQ]

1/ 🚀 Big News! We're excited to share our newest partnership with @RepublicCrypto.

🤝 Clients can now leverage Republic Runtime for staking while still benefiting from #Fordefi's secure MPC technology, transaction simulation, and granular policy controls.

⬇️ Keep Scrolling ⬇️

[Martin Shkreli (e/acc) @wagieeacc]

"Our Korean Friend"

The following is edited testimony from Gary Wang implicating SBF. It is breathtaking.

Q. How did this special "Allow Negative" privilege come about?
A. Sam had asked Nishad and I to add the ability to——to pay for various FTX-related expenses from Alameda's accounts and from a few other bookkeeping accounts on FTX.
Q. And when was that?
A. This was in July 2019.
Q. How long after starting the exchange was that?
A. This was a few months after starting the exchange.
Q. Was Alameda given this special advantage around when it was introduced?
A. Yes.
Q. What, if anything, did the defendant say about why Alameda needed the ability to have a negative account balance?
A. So we wanted to——so Sam said that he wanted to pay for
some——pay for certain FTT-related expenses from Alameda's
accounts.
Q. Okay. We'll come back to that. Over time, was the use of this ability to have an account balance go negative used only by Alameda for that purpose——that is, the FTT expenses?
A. No.
Q. So was it used for other purposes?
A. Yes.
Q. What else was it used for?
A. It was also used by Alameda for trading.
Q. What do you mean by that?
A. To withdraw from FTX and send it other exchanges to use for their trading activities.
Q. And so did this special advantage——that is, the ability to
have a negative account balance——allow Alameda to make
unlimited withdrawals off of the FTX exchange?
A. Yes.
Q. As a result of that special advantage, could Alameda make unlimited withdrawals from the exchange even when its account balance was below zero?
A. Yes.
Q. And so if Alameda's account balance was zero or negative, for example, in Bitcoin, and it used its special advantage to withdraw Bitcoin, whose Bitcoin would it be withdrawing?
A. From cus——it would be withdrawing customers' Bitcoin.
Q. I'll ask you again: When Alameda withdrew money from the exchange while it had a negative balance, whose money was it withdrawing?
A. So I——either FTX's own money or money from customers——was withdrawing money from customers.
Q. When you said FTX's own money, what are you referring to?
A. The money FTX earned from trading fees from customers.
Q. And you said Alameda withdrew or had a negative balance of $8 billion; is that right?
A. Yes.
Q. Was that more than the amount of money that FTX had in
revenue?
A. Yes.
Q. So then whose money did that $8 billion come from?
A. From customers.
Q. And what about the defendant?
A. He did not look at it, but he was——we told him——he asked us to do it and then we told him we did it.
Q. Now this comment says, "And we set Allow Negative equals true for," and it lists a bunch of accounts. Let me just stop there. When it says "we set Allow Negative equals true," what does that mean?
A. So it means that prior to or as part of making the change, he went into the database and set the "Allow Negative" column to true for a particular——a particular set of accounts.
Q. So for this set of accounts, I want to ask you about a few of them. It lists I think——let's see, one, two, three, four, five——six accounts; is that right?
A. Yes.
Q. So do you see the second account, info@Alameda(9)?
A. Yes.
Q. What is that a reference to?
A. That's the main https://t.co/5xnSeiLBRz trading account.
Q. That's Alameda's main account.
A. Yes.
Q. And what is the next account there?
A. The info@Alameda off-market FTT subaccounts is the account that Alameda was using to host some of its FTTs.
Q. These numbers next to the main Alameda account and its subaccount, what are those?
A. Those are the account IDs of those accounts and subaccounts.
Q. The next one here is cottonwoodtrading@gmail off-market FTT subaccount, and has a number. What's that account?
A. That's a——that's another Alameda account.
Q. Okay. So then there are two accounts that I didn't ask you about. Are those customer accounts?
A. No.
Q. Okay. What kind of accounts are they?
A. They're bookkeeping accounts.

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

Scoop the latest insight from our very own @_LewisHarland_

[CoinDesk @CoinDesk]

According to valuation models based on Metcalfe law, which incorporate active user adoption of Ethereum layer 2 scaling solutions, suggests ether should trade at a market value of $275 billion, according to @_LewisHarland_. By @godbole17.

https://t.co/185par3KYU

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

Reach out to learn more!

[Republic Crypto @RepublicCrypto]

The RxR team just unveiled their latest research:

✨On Ethereum's Valuation✨

https://t.co/1RRhUq4W19

[Republic @joinrepublic]

Hear more about the Republic Wallet from our wallet product lead, Marina Tassi. More on why we built the wallet, how to use it, and how we see the future of the wallet evolving.

Huge 👏 👏 to our incredible product team!

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

@KendrickEsq @elonmusk @anothercohen Republic Crypto provides the solutions @elonmusk has been looking for *uses jedi magic*

[Kendrick Nguyen @KendrickEsq]

@elonmusk @anothercohen We have a turnkey and compliant solution for this:

https://t.co/4w26xHw4wG

Would love to help execute!

[Gnosis Pay 💳 @gnosispay]

For more information, please visit our website: https://t.co/hP1woi3UwW

Don't hesitate to reach out with any inquiries.

LFG!🚀

https://t.co/PWcSlbJdGU

[Knipper @OneKnipper]

@Shenanigrahams YAAAS