@engrICO2015 People must stop complaining, and start una -living the Fulani radical Islamic jihadist terrorists. The killing is one way. All the indigenous nationalities must start doing the needful.
The US should do something about the repeated jihadi massacres in Plateau and Biafra states in Nigeria. The bloodshed is untenable.
@POTUS@SecRubio@SecWar@IFCoalition
https://t.co/A2SkeLD1oN
This is the same petition calling on Pres. Trump to help guarantee three things, which should be basic human right:
1) Free and fair election in 2027.
2) New constitution of, by and for the people.
3) A binding referendum for self determination for all the nations that make up the contraption called Nigeria.
A COURT THAT REFUSES TO SHOW THE LAW HAS ABANDONED THE CONSTITUTION
“Show me the law” was not a plea. It was the Constitution, spoken in open court.
By Onyedikachi Ifedi, Esq.
The commentators who mocked Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s demand—“My Lord, show me the law”—thought they were ridiculing a pro se defendant. In truth, they were cheering Justice Omotosho's public execution of the Nigerian Constitution.
Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was right. Justice J.K. Omotosho owed him that answer as a basic constitutional prerequisite. Instead, the trial court chose defiance, shielding a dead law from the light of the statute book to secure a pre-engineered conviction.
1. A Constitutional SACRILEGE (Sections 36(6)(a) & 36(12) CFRN)
Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution is not an option; it is an absolute, non-derogable prohibition. It explicitly mandates that no person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless that offence and penalty stand in a written law in force at the time of conviction.
Ask the only question that shatters the entire trial: Which written law was in force on 20 November 2025?
It was not the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013 (TPAA). The National Assembly executed and buried that statute in May 2022. The only written law in force on conviction day was the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022 (TPPA).
Justice Omotosho did not convict under the living law of the land. He convicted on a legal corpse.
The Constitution does not care what law was on the books when the state began its hunt; it demands to know what law exists on the day the judge pronounces “guilty.” By sentencing a man under a dead statute, the court committed an unpardonable constitutional violation.
Simultaneously, the court trampled Section 36(6)(a) CFRN. After forcing an unrepresented defendant to navigate his own defence, the court systematically refused to inform him, in detail, of the case he was meeting under any extant statute. The charge sheet named one non-existent law and six other legal fiction; the judge protected the lie.
2. WEAPONISED IGNORANCE: Trashing the Evidence Act
Under Section 122 of the Evidence Act 2011, judicial notice of the laws of Nigeria is a mandatory statutory duty. The court MUST know the law. The judge does not need a party to bring the Official Gazette—he is sworn to embody it.
When an unrepresented defendant stood alone and explicitly demanded that the court take judicial notice of the 2022 repeal, Justice Omotosho performed a masterpiece of judicial gymnastics. In his judgment, he claimed to "assume without conceding" that the 2013 Act was repealed.
A judge does not "assume" the repeal of a penal statute; he acknowledges it or he violates his oath as a judge. To "assume" repeal while continuing to convict under the repealed text is pure intellectual dishonesty—keeping a dead statute alive just long enough to pass a life sentence.
Worse still was the hypocrisy. The trial court had no trouble taking judicial notice of an ex parte administrative order to brand IPOB a proscribed group. The court gladly opened its eyes to notice what helped the State, but struck itself blind when asked to notice that the prosecution's charge sheet was a legal nullity.
The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on this point is uncompromising:
Orugbo v. Una: The court is bound to know the law ex officio.
Ogbomor v. The State & Nwankwoala v. FRN: Try a man under a repealed, non-existent law and the entire trial is an absolute nullity, no matter how many months or years were wasted conducting it or the amount of evidence.
A.G. Lagos v. Dosunmu: A repealed statute is dead. You cannot erect a lawful conviction upon a legal void.
@FederalHigh@njcNig@NigerianBarz@NigBarAssoc@IBAnews@NGRPresident@NGRSenate@StateDept@FCDOGovUK
@sowore Sowore, my brother, you got it wrong here. I didn’t see you protest against the massacre of Israeli people on October 7th. It’s just like Fulani jihadist on killing spree in Nigeria, and if there’s a chance to decimate them some fools will protest. Terrorism must end for peace.
"Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s legal battle is the ultimate test case for Nigeria. How the courts handle it will either destroy the credibility of the judiciary or define its true independence."
@jcokechukwu This dirty woman must be stripped of the innocent children.The Arabo-pedophilia Islamic bastards, lured her with money to do this to her vulnerable children, while preserving their own. She doesn’t deserve the children. Anulika and her sympathizers must be put away. Abomination.
Why is demanding accountability considered an act of rebellion in Nigeria? Citizens have the right to demand justice, accountability, and good governance. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is a freedom fighter, not a terrorist. Free MNK!
#FreemaziNnamdikanunow
Critique of Press Coverage and Institutional Accountability
The statement further criticized the press for focusing heavily on the denial of an allocutus, describing it as a distraction from what he terms a fundamental jurisdictional flaw that goes to the heart of the trial's constitutionality.
Chidera also raised concerns regarding systemic bias, pointing out the key figures involved across the trial bench, prosecution, ministry, and security operations, calling on the press to hold public officers accountable regardless of institutional or political ties.
"The Court of Appeal will ultimately decide this case, but the press has a primary duty to speak truth to power and report the full legal context accurately," the statement concluded
@njcNig@NigBarAssoc@FederalHigh@NigerianBarz@officialABAT@DailyPostNGR@LeadershipNGA@GuardianNigeria@StateDept@FCDOGovUK
@BashirAhmaad Terrorists everywhere. Useless dead Buhari Trojan horse. Unpatriotic and undesirable elements. This is a sad story of Nigeria , and a failed miserable state. Separation of Nigeria Is a task that must be fulfilled.
@im_Kolins Bu he brainwashed some in the south to deny their Igbo Identity, and claim that accepting will make Igbos in other areas gain more access to oil. In all their education they succumbed to accepting South- south,a geographical manipulation. Worst thing to anyone is identity crisis.
Arrest senator Shehu Buba now or immediately separate Nigeria into sharia north, Christian middlebelt,Christian/Muslim west,and Judeo Christian east. International community must not ignore this because both foreign nationals and locals have been affected bythis govt complicity
@DEngliishalhaji@edinatoz It’s Fulani radical Islamic jihadist terrorists. It’s one religion , Islam, doing this because they want to Islamize Nigeria. The Muslims that were casualties are considered non Muslims enough. Some. Also, the shia and Sunni Muslim dichotomy results in casualties. We must divide
@AloyEjimakor This is justified before God and Man. There is no compromise to this stand. MNK is the answer to all open and hidden questions. No Igbo political leader currently has that answer. Do not be deceived by them.