Manuel Arias

👾web developer.
just sharing what I learn everyday 🤯

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

@compusophy Beautiful

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

@dangreenheck Like 2 months ago for me 🙌🙌

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

I think is looking better, maybe ill change alpha so I can keep the model visible but I just were able to the the direction and reflection working...

#threejs #threejsjourney #glsl

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

im taking a break from uni and assessments, I wanted to continue with #threejsjourney and practice some #threejs, just finished this lesson.

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

then I just started reading about fresnel and how to implement it #glsl and try to simulate water, just first try...

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

I think some people will start hiring again....

[Hedgie @HedgieMarkets]

🦔Microsoft canceled its internal Claude Code licenses this week after token-based billing made the cost untenable, even for a company with effectively infinite cloud resources. Uber's CTO sent an internal memo warning the company burned through its entire 2026 AI budget in just four months. American AI software prices have jumped 20% to 37%, and GitHub (owned by Microsoft) is dropping flat-rate plans for usage-based billing across its products.

My Take
The AI subsidy era is ending in real time. The same company that put $13 billion into OpenAI and built the Azure infrastructure powering most of Anthropic's compute just looked at the bill from a competitor's coding tool and decided it was not worth paying. That is not a productivity failure on Anthropic's end. Token-based pricing is forcing every enterprise customer to confront the actual cost of running these models at scale, and the number turns out to be far higher than the flat-rate experiments suggested.

This ties directly to my Gemini Flash post yesterday. Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google all raised effective prices in the last six months. Enterprises that built workflows assuming AI costs would keep falling are now watching annual budgets evaporate in months. Two outcomes look likely from here. Either enterprises scale back AI usage to fit budgets, which slows the revenue ramp the labs need to justify their valuations ahead of IPOs, or the labs cut prices and absorb the losses, which makes the unit economics worse at exactly the wrong moment. Both paths land in the same place, the numbers stop working, and somebody has to take the writedown.

Hedgie🤗

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

@pigpoopballs90 @XorDev On a browser with js and Canvas

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

@threejs @wordgrammer Just use binary code and make your own game

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

@YoheiNishitsuji 🤯🤯

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

@threejs Not enough

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

@XorDev I dont even know what it means the first row but ill study more 🫩🫩🤓🤓

[Xor @XorDev]

Really good chart. Math ‹-› Code

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

How future developers will be good at something... anything... if AI is not letting people be bad at coding because it gives the feeling that with writing something on a chat we can "make" something work...

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

6 to 12 months developers will replace AI

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

LLM's prices should keep increasing so I can get junior job 😎

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

@threejs @holtsetio Whooo so you can make this without a model? 🤯🤯🤯 how?!!!!! Whoahhhhh I wanna knowwww

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

@XorDev

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

@bruno_simon I can keep waiting...

[Manuel Arias @onimae_dev]

Idk why now every time im reading someone's post as soon i see the words AI or vibecoding just mute or skip that... its just a reflex