Nam Sibyllam quidem Cumis ego ipse oculis meis vidi in ampulla pendere, et cum illi pueri dicerent: 'Σίβυλλα τί θέλεις;' respondebat illa: 'άποθανεîν θέλω.'
@JerusalemDemsas While I enjoy both writers, do they worry that their centering of the NIMBY left is warped by their online presence? It seems to me that most on-the-ground NIMBYs are typically of no particular ideological shade, just narrowly self-interested. Might this focus hurt K/T's message?
@histmatt@gayspacegulag I was genuinely excited for the post, given the context, only for the actual description in the /tv/ post to be a dumb person trying to describe how smart people think.
@Todd_Toddleston@ettingermentum Yeah, you could help Russia take over their neighbor and achieve their imperialist ambitions. But I think that would be pretty bad and immoral.
@Todd_Toddleston@ettingermentum I don't think my opinion is distasteful at all: I think everyone agrees that there are things worth going to war for, and thus that there are things for which it is worth supporting someone else's fight.
@Todd_Toddleston@ettingermentum Which is the same as granting the other side military victory via warfare. We didn't get here by Russia randomly waking up with 20% of Ukraine on their side of the front lines.
@thewhowhatwhy If you've paid attention to Mark Ames for more than a year or two, you'd know that's exactly what he's saying. Google him, if you don't believe me.
He's (probably) not even paid by the Kremlin, he just repeats the Kremlin's POV for the love of the game.
@ettingermentum (...) those geopolitical goals in the hopes of temporarily stemming the far-right's surge. He's not trying to say "wow, the far-right weaponizes the cost of living," he's saying "wow, better stop trying to hinder Russian imperialism so that the far-right wins fewer elections."
@ettingermentum Come on, man, this is Ames. Aside from the sex tourism/assault/generally being among the skeeviest men alive, he has clear ulterior motives. He knows Russia backs the far-right to further their geopolitical goals: he's hoping the West abandons any attempts at hindering (...)
@souljagoytellem Part of me really dislikes that my 2019-era view of how different groups of people would vote turned out to be right, just like... five years later. Revising the revision of my priors.
@LikeAPhoenician@Proxy_Tank@ettingermentum I don't know if that's true, though. Bernie would have been a much better President and likely could have prevented Trump winning in 2024, but I'm honestly not sure if he would have won in 2020, looking at how close that election was.
@Reil76@PrinciperSkiple@BertandtheDucks@EverydaySens a) That person is the leader of the country.
b) So yes, it does.
c) Also, nearly 50% of the country voted for the guy. He won a plurality of the vote. He *does* represent people.
@BertandtheDucks@EverydaySens Dude, your country is actively trying to fuck over Canada's economy and well-being. Why do you think that comes without consequence?
@LopHopper@NotKatWeegee Emo *is* the 2010s. That's like saying you like prog rock and getting mad when someone says they like Pink Floyd. Like sure, there's new stuff, but the genre is of a certain time and place.