Berk

Stardust in temporary alignment. Sci-curious. Blocked by Ken Ham, WLC, Ark Encounter, Creation Museum, Frank Turek & ICRscience. Twice blocked by Sye Ten B.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

"When a system becomes more important than the people it's supposed to serve, it's time for the people to decide upon a different system."
-- Berk.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

Ever noticed how theists mistake atheism for being something that it's not?

[Anchored Soul @anchoredso37497]

Have you ever noticed how atheists have no explanations and no answers? Zero. Not a single meaningful one. Only objections.

They’re not skeptics—they’re sleepwalkers. But it doesn’t have to be that way.

Follow the white rabbit.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

@SlenderSkeptic Well, I wouldn't know.

But at least I found someone who wants to find out!

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

Anyone else get the feeling MrWestford wants jackhammered up the arse by some well-endowed hunk?

[MrWesford @Tsar_Martyr]

Gay people are not real.

The burden of proof is on those claiming gay people are real.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

@SlenderSkeptic Just one???!?!??!!???

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

"Thiiiiiis still doesn't count as proo-ooo-ooooo-ooff!!"

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

@bbcquestiontime @BBCiPlayer @BBCSounds @BBCNews No Count Binface?

#bbcbias

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

And who created that nature?

[Danny @Truth_matters20]

"Homosexuality is natural."

Correct.

It is natural for fallen humanity to sin.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

Why is it so difficult for these hateful bigots to understand that there's no such thing as sin?

[Kam @PatsKam]

Why is it so hard for people to understand that you can love the person, but hate the sin? Be loving, but also know that it isn’t right, but no need to be hateful.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

We can objectively determine the sun exists. We can detect light from it in lumens, and the neutrinos from it using dry cleaning fluid.

Tell me what apparatus you need to detect God, and the units of measure.

[Kam @PatsKam]

I believe in God the same way a blind man believed in the sun. Not because he can see it, but because he can feel it.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

Creationists claim God can create an eye much more complex than any video camera, but seemingly he couldn't create a video camera.

[Martin @MartinTweats]

There were no video recorders to film it.
There were no cameras to photograph it.
There was no microphones to capture the sound of it.

You disbelieve because God did not send all three devices descending on a cloud to capture the event.

Even if He did, you'd still disbelieve.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

Sure. Just prove your God exists and atheism is debunked.

But, since you haven't,

Atheism is alive and well.

[MrWesford @Tsar_Martyr]

Atheism is falsifiable

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

@Mat_Hunt Well, there is still time.

His pinned tweet betrays his ego.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

Blatant dishonesty.

Lies and misrepresentation.

Then a block, so you can't respond.

It's the Christian way.

[Martin @MartinTweats]

@oohglobbits5 So nobody is born not believing in God.

Children are brainwashed into not believing in God by lying atheists.

Ok got it.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

@Mat_Hunt Et Tu?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

The problem is nothing to do with science.

The problem is you can't prove your God exists.

That's the problem with things that don't exist - it's extremely difficult to prove that they do!

[Martin @MartinTweats]

Science cannot prove that God does or doesn't exist, as science can only prove the physical a posteriori.

But God is a metaphysical question proven a priori. To claim that science proves God either way is to make a category error, as science cannot prove metaphysics.

Science cannot even prove that logic, math and modal truth exist, yet science presupposes that they exist in order to prove science, i.e., science takes the existence of those things on faith alone.

Therefore, science is predicated on faith.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

Is he really this incapable?

[Martin @MartinTweats]

Why would religion X advocate for people to follow a religion other than religion X?

Surely religion X wants people to following religion X, not religion Y. If religion X advocates for people to follow religion Y, then religion X decreases.

This post makes no logical sense.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

Irony of ironies.

#fail

[Martin @MartinTweats]

They are not claiming that the idols are gods. The idols are simply images of gods, but not the gods themselves.

You committed the map-territory fallacy.

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

Science improves.

Christians just want to stay wrong.

[Creation Today @creationtoday]

A museum exhibit had to be covered up because new discoveries showed it was wrong.

Human theories change. God's Word does not.

Evolution is not a neutral conclusion. It is a worldview built on assumptions about the past.

👉 https://t.co/4QfW1PGmJX

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

Prove it.

[The Blessed Peasant @blessedpeasant_]

Scientific knowledge is standing on nothing without God

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

You block those who debunk you.

So why DO you bother?

[Martin @MartinTweats]

Me: [uses epistemic logic]
Atheist: "BrAiN rOt"

Why do I even bother?

[Berk @ooohglobbits]

@AleMartnezR1 Well no.

If information is found in generic material then it debunks your first and second premises.