ophello

Humanity must not tolerate the activity of NHI who operate on our home planet without our awareness or consent.

[ophello @ophello]

"It's just classified tech, nothing to see here."
"It's just a distraction from the Epstein files."
"They're lying in order to get more money."
"Nothing can travel faster than light."
"Pilots sometimes get confused."
"Must be a smudge on the lens."
"The witnesses are all grifters."
"It's just a parallax illusion."
"There's no evidence."
"Definitely a balloon."
"It's Chinese drones."
"It's Russian drones."
"Maybe a balloon."
"It's just a psyop."
"It's all drones."
"I'm confused."
"It's just birds."
"I'm afraid."
"Help me."

[ophello @ophello]

@bigg_matthew @TheUfoJoe Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

[ophello @ophello]

@papituita They reveal themselves regularly to the human beings they abduct and abuse. The reason they aren’t open about it is because they don’t want humanity to panic, and because it would not suit their agenda.

They aren’t waiting for us to be “ready.” They’re exploiting us.

[ophello @ophello]

@nuitsamedi Tough luck, buddy. The amount of evidence is overwhelming that we’re being visited. https://t.co/CrnbSXB3AJ

[ophello @ophello]

@Cruzeir27640415 Uh…no.

[ophello @ophello]

@Iluvalar1 @howie_hua Wrong. 0.49999… is literally equal to 0.5. That’s its value. It isn’t approaching 0.5. It is equal to 0.5.

[ophello @ophello]

@Dark_Goldenrod @howie_hua You just made it complicated and you got the wrong answer.

Infinitely repeated digits equal the value they approach. 0.4999…repeating forever is literally equal to 0.5.

[ophello @ophello]

@UnforcedAG @howie_hua Wrong. If the 9s repeat forever, it literally is 0.5.

[ophello @ophello]

@howie_hua Repeating 9s means the value is literally 0.5. Which means you’d round to 1.

Any other answer is wrong.

[ophello @ophello]

@gangatoday1 @nextnews @RedPandaKoala Honest question: why are we summoning that guy into the conversation? What insights does he have that are helpful?

[ophello @ophello]

@Ancient_EQ Nope. We have more than speculation to work with: we have sightings and encounters from abduction victims.

[ophello @ophello]

Name one effect of “the phenomenon” that aliens with advanced technology from other star systems can’t explain.

[ophello @ophello]

Why would I have to prove something that is mathematically and statistically guaranteed, which is what the vast majority of the scientific community already accepts?

If anyone here needs therapy, it’s you for living in a fictional reality where the Earth is the center of the universe. I also suggest visiting a local library, or even just going outside for a change.

[ophello @ophello]

@Ryan_Heltemes @ai_sentience Nothing says Darwinian cannon fodder better than scientific illiteracy.

[ophello @ophello]

@Ryan_Heltemes @ai_sentience dur hur vakseens ar bad

[ophello @ophello]

@pickover No god is required. This is a basic consequence of geometry. It’s like asking how god decided that 1 + 1 = 2

[ophello @ophello]

@ai_sentience No.

[ophello @ophello]

@JayAriavt https://t.co/kSnXf1W7sy

[Shivers @thinkingshivers]

I don’t get it. I filled my FleshCube with the freshest blood money could buy, yet mosquitos still target me instead of the cube. What am I doing wrong?

[ophello @ophello]

@ThePrimaryMind Naw I’m good. How about you come up with a better argument instead?

[ophello @ophello]

Following a dead-end theory requires no effort. There is no such thing as “supernatural.” Everything is natural, including spiritual realms and non-corporeal beings.

What’s also natural is biological life traveling around the local galaxy looking for biological resources on a planet filled with naive humanoids who are superstitious, inexperienced, and extremely easy to fool.

Don’t mistake aliens for angels. They know what you’re likely to trust, and they can easily pretend to be what you want them to be.

[ophello @ophello]

@thuringen67 And what if they can project holograms and alter our brain chemistry? If so, all bets are off. Everything you’re describing could be explained with sensory manipulation.

We have no idea what they are technologically capable of. It is generally a mistake to underestimate.

[ophello @ophello]

@Bluepen841636 @RonyVernet I’m not debating with you! I’m debating with Vallee and the prevailing sentiments. These are good questions you’re asking.