@Mhm828@Mylovanov Really poor agumentation @Mhm828 . Putin has no fear of NATO aggression. Any claims are simply information operations. Reason #1 this is true: NATO's need for "consultation" to do anything. Russia does not feel NATO is a threat - Putin says that to justify his agression.
@CollinRugg@WesternLensman The amount of ignorance and lack of logic in what you are suggesting suggests to me that you arent ignorant, just an unscrupulous shill who will trumpet anything that will get you and your worldview attention.
@USIP Agree. Leaving smaller, disadvantaged nations to the whims of immoral realists is just a recipe for chaos and war. People in search of a better future need the bands of alliances. Unfortunately this means all must sacrifice for the threatened, but it is for the best for all.
@nicholadrummond Highly doubt they "destroyed all the radars..." Doing so would be highly escalatory as it must be read by Iran as the opening move to a much more aggressive action. Israel is not so foolish as to do that, even if they could.
@BrianKerg Another angle: airpower provides the means to impose loss and make a statement without entanglement. Perhaps we need to shift from short term decisiveness to long term limited objectives.
@SebastianBae Just that the ancient Egyptians were pretty avid gamers but most of their rules have been lost to time, so we dont really know quite how to play them.
I guess the lesson is to print your rulebook on material that wont disintegrate