@LionelMedia@RealCandaceO Absolutely. I have learnt so much by just listening to her curiosity mind, and her passionate for knowledge sharing and speaking truthfully even she knows it will hurt sometimes. Go Max and warm greetings to you @LionelMedia all the way from Papua New Guinea 🇵🇬🙏🌺😊
None of these people are truly religious. They are two things: liars, putting on a show and religious fanatics. But none of them are true believers. True believers do not bomb or rape children. Only fanatics worship false gods. Spare me the theater.
@brandiandbillie@RealCandaceO It was absolutely amazing! Immediately after, the following video started playing on YouTube and I became emotional all over again. 😭Someone created this and it perfectly summed up the why behind everything…
https://t.co/visxvWrpiK
@officialdogpack Awww thanks Goldie and Frenchie. I’m traveling at the moment and have been away from my Son ( Ocean - mix breed ) and I can’t wait to get home to him next month. So thank you for the reassurance. You guys are the best
@JohnMappin@RealCandaceO Thank you John for your wise words as always. Let us also keep Candace, her family, and the courageous independent individuals in our prayers. It’s a spiritual warfare happening. As believers of Lord Jesus, the victory has been won, we stand from a place of VICTORY. God bless
🚨EXPLOSED: ALEX JONES' Latest RANT On CANDACE OWENS Is A Masterclass In LIES, HALF-TRUTHS, AND DESPERATE SMEARS – Line-By-Line DEBUNK
@RealAlexJones just dropped another unhinged attack on Candace Owens – twisting her words, inventing claims she never made, and ignoring massive new bombshells that blow his "debunk" to pieces.
Alex, you screamed on your show: "You want a war"? You got one!
Let's go line by line through his lies (transcript key points) and set the record straight with facts from Candace, Mitch, and independent verification.
1⃣Alex: "Candace continues to make claims about Egyptian planes... hit teams in Fort Huachuca... 12 Colonels... killing Kirk... Erica Kirk's there... head of security there."
LIE. Candace has never claimed a "hit team" or that Charlie was killed at Fort Huachuca. Mitch said he saw civilians (possible mis-ID) at a Sept 9 early-morning meeting with military brass – not "12 colonels planning a murder." Candace has always said the meeting was significant, but the only unconfirmed part is exact civilian IDs. Everything else (Mitch on base, meeting happened, detention) is verified.
2⃣Alex: "I spent good money getting actual flight data... it's all lies."
HALF-TRUTH. The RCH702/SAM flight Candace highlighted (booked by Under Secretary Bradley Hansell's office) is real – landed at Fort Huachuca Sept 8 after Colorado Springs border visit. Holds up to 12 passengers. Alex ignores this and pretends it's "Egyptian planes" nonsense – Candace mentioned Egyptian planes in separate context (threats/searches), not as the "hit team plane."
3⃣Alex: "Mitch Snow... wanders into secure SCIF... armed guards... 12 colonels."
STRAW MAN. Mitch never claimed he "wandered into a SCIF." He said he saw civilians in the lobby area (Sept 8) and was detained near the meeting room (Sept 9) – consistent with on-base lodging access and MP confirmation.
4⃣Alex: "He's got five women with restraining orders... kids going public... time in prison... beating up women."
MISLEADING. Old allegations (no convictions on serious charges). New audio (dropped today) from Mitch's son confirms the ex (Candace Gracik) was the manipulator – son calls her "mean," says she "controls" Mitch. Mitch defends her on the call – classic abuse dynamic. Gary Melton's "exposé" guest (the son) backfired – verified the MP call on Sept 9.
5⃣Alex: "Candace says 'I thought maybe this Daily Wire guy was there'... vending machine, give him a name."
LIE. Candace shared a viewer tip/photo resemblance – openly said "could be nothing" and mis-ID possible. Never presented as fact.
6⃣Alex: "Her followers say 'we don't care if Mitch Snow wrong, we back Candace'."
TWIST. Supporters back the verified parts (base presence, meeting, detention) and demand alibis for the sighting window – not "blind loyalty."
7⃣Alex: Calls Candace "married to British lord... handler George Farmer... CIA/MI6."
ABSURD. George Farmer is a known conservative (Parler CEO, Brexit supporter). No evidence of "handler." Pure conspiracy smear with zero proof.
8⃣Alex ignores two massive stories today:
🔴Audio of Mitch, ex Candace Gracik, and son – son confirms mom's manipulation, verifies MP call Sept 9. Destroys Gracik's credibility (she attacked Mitch on Gary's show).
🔴Wolves and Finance exposé: $4.7M from TPUSA to "1Ten LLC" (UPS mailbox shell) tied to Tyler Bowyer (TPUSA COO) and Jake Hoffman. Bowyer went from debt/garnishment to $650K cash mansion down payment as the money flowed.
🔴Polymarket sponsors (deep Trump ties) all dropped coordinated attacks on Candace same day.
This isn't "research." This is controlled opposition.
Alex won't touch the REAL financial scandal at TPUSA, the FACTS of Mitch's Story that EXONERATE him, or PROOF of the coordinated smear campaign through Polymarket – because it hits too close to the donors/power players he protects.
⚠️The big tell: Not what Alex covers... but what he refuses to cover.
Candace is asking questions Alex is paid to bury.
The truth doesn't fear investigation. Lies scream "shut it down."
Charlie Kirk deserves justice – not smears.
@RealCandaceO is the only one fighting for it.
Watch Alex's rant vs. the facts – the contrast is damning.
We're not in a cult. We're awake. 🔥
@ProjectConstitu@RealCandaceO@RealAlexJones@LauraLoomer Thank you 🙏The world is watching and we ALL want to know the truth why CK was killed. Candace is the only one trying her best to uncover it, when such individuals like Alex is simply misleading. Please stop it.
The Asylum Instinct: When Argument Collapses into Concern
By John Mappin
For IF Magazine
There are moments when a civilisation gives itself away.
Not with jackboots or tanks, but with language. With a sentence so revealing that one scarcely needs to read further to understand that something has gone profoundly wrong.
When Josh Hammer @josh_hammer calls for the involuntary commitment of Candace Owens @RealCandaceO , and wistfully gestures toward the reinstatement of the sectioning laws of the 1950s and 1960s, we are no longer in the realm of political disagreement. We are in the presence of something far darker.
This is not conservatism.
It is not order.
It is not reason.
It is authoritarian psychosis masquerading as concern.
This is why Alex Jones's @RealAlexJones outburst of personal psychosis questioning Candace's mind and mental health was so harmful to his own reputation earlier this week.
The world noted that he has started civilisation down this dark path.
The Moment the Mask Slips - The call to have a political opponent forcibly detained for her views is the ultimate confession of intellectual bankruptcy. It announces, loudly and without ambiguity, that the speaker has lost faith in persuasion, in evidence, in debate itself.
What replaces them is coercion - This is not a slip of the tongue. It is the unfiltered emergence of a mindset that believes power exists to silence, not to argue; to contain, not to convince. Historically, this mindset has only ever belonged to regimes that were frightened.
Sectioning as Political Fantasy - The romanticisation of mid-20th-century sectioning laws is particularly grotesque. Those laws were not monuments to sanity; they were instruments of convenience. They allowed families, institutions, and states to remove inconvenient individuals from public life with minimal scrutiny and near-total impunity.
Women were committed for being outspoken.
Whistleblowers were committed for being troublesome.
Dissidents were committed for being correct at the wrong time.
To invoke that era fondly is to confess ignorance at best and moral corruption at worst.
Psychiatry as the Last Weapon - Psychiatry, when weaponised, has a singular function: to end the argument by disqualifying the speaker. Once someone is declared “unwell,” their words cease to matter. Their evidence becomes delusion. Their courage becomes pathology.
This is why every authoritarian system eventually reaches for the psychiatrist.
The Soviet Union perfected it. Dissidents were diagnosed, not debated. “Sluggish schizophrenia” became the official label for people who refused to agree with the state. The asylum replaced the court. The diagnosis replaced the verdict.
What Hammer proposes is not a new idea. It is a recycled tyranny.
The True Psychosis - There is a delicious irony in all this. The person accused of mental instability is the one asking questions, seeking clarity, demanding accountability. The person proposing mass coercion, suspension of rights, and state-sanctioned confinement presents himself as the voice of reason.
But sanity does not demand cages.
The truly unbalanced impulse is the desire to remove another adult’s liberty because one dislikes her conclusions. That impulse — the urge to silence by force when challenged — is the real pathology on display.
A sane mind argues.
An unstable one reaches for restraints.
This Is How Slavery Thinks - The mechanisms are ancient. Slavery has never been sustained by chains alone. It requires a moral narrative in which the enslaved are said to be incapable of self-governance. Childlike. Irrational. Dangerous if left free.
Calling for involuntary commitment follows the same logic. It asserts that some people are unfit to participate in public life and must be managed by their betters.
This is not freedom speaking. It is ownership.
Bad Manners, Bad Minds - There was once a basic standard of conduct in public life. One could be severe, even ruthless, in argument without resorting to dehumanisation. Suggesting that a woman should be locked away for her views would have been recognised instantly for what it is: disgraceful.
The abandonment of that standard is not progress. It is regression. It is what happens when people lose confidence in their own intellect and compensate with threats.
Why This Matters More Than Ever - Candace Owens is not threatening the state. She is threatening complacency. She is asking questions others would prefer remain unasked. That is why the response has escalated from rebuttal to diagnosis, and now from diagnosis to detention.
This escalation tells us everything we need to know.
When those who claim to defend liberty begin openly fantasising about psychiatric incarceration, the problem is no longer fringe. It has entered the bloodstream.
The Line That Ends Civilisation - There is a final line that must never be crossed in a free society: the use of medicine as a substitute for law, and diagnosis as a substitute for debate.
Once crossed, everything becomes permissible. Any dissenter can be declared unstable. Any truth can be reclassified as illness. Any tyrant can call himself a healer.
History does not forgive those who walk willingly into that darkness.
The call to involuntarily commit Candace Owens is not merely wrong. It is insane. It reveals a mind so unmoored from liberal civilisation that it would resurrect the asylum rather than risk losing an argument.
That is not strength.
That is fear, naked and panicked.
And it should alarm anyone who still believes that freedom is something to be argued for — not something to be locked away.
@Nero@TuckerCarlson
Truth has its own power.
Stand in its way at your own risk.
Well done @RealCandaceO
Many more people of good will that witnessed a person of good will get publicly and ritually executed in front of their eyes will be coming forward and will be helping you.
🎯🔥🎯
Dear Alex,
@RealAlexJones
If one were a gentleman with basic manners and understood the history of the suppression of freedom of speech and the mechanisms of slavery, one simply would not act in the way that you and others seem to be acting.
You are far from alone in such actions.
There is a particular moment when a free voice stops being argued with and starts being diagnosed.
It is an unmistakable tell.
The facts are no longer confronted, the reasoning is no longer challenged, and debate gives way to insinuation.
"Something must be wrong with her", they say.
"He is unstable."
"She needs help."
The Old Trick, Reheated: Psychiatry as a Political Weapon
When you suggests that Candace Owens @RealCandaceO has mental-health issues, we are not witnessing a medical opinion. We are watching an ancient political reflex try to reassert itself.
It is the reflex of capture.
This is not disagreement. It is attempted character liquidation.
And worse than that, it is not the behaviour of a gentleman.
From Argument to Asylum - Historically, psychiatry has been the velvet glove over the iron fist of power. When states encounter voices that will not bend, psychiatry is mobilised to do what censorship alone cannot: to delegitimise the speaker, rather than the speech.
The Soviet Union perfected this technique.
Dissidents were not refuted, they were diagnosed with “sluggish schizophrenia,” a convenient condition whose principal symptom appeared to be disagreement with the state.
The asylum replaced the courtroom. The white coat replaced the black robe. One could be locked away not for being wrong, but for being dangerously correct.
This was not an anomaly. It was method.
Elsewhere, political non-conformity was routinely reframed as psychological deviance. Psychiatry became a bureaucratic solvent, dissolving inconvenient truths into supposed disorders. The pattern is consistent and deeply instructive: when truth threatens power, diagnosis is cheaper than rebuttal.
Western democracies flatter themselves that such crudities belong to history. They do not. They have merely been rebranded.
The modern rebranding - Today, the asylum has been replaced by the smear, the section order by the insinuation, the padded cell by the social-media whisper. The language is softer, the intentions unchanged. “Concern for wellbeing” now does the work once done by iron bars.
To suggest that Candace Owens has mental-health problems is not concern. It is an attempted rhetorical kill-shot. It signals to the audience that her arguments need not be examined.
One may dismiss the ideas by discrediting the mind that holds them.
This is the language of institutions, not of honourable debate.
It is a trick usually reserved for committees, compliance departments, and state-adjacent NGOs. When it appears in supposedly anti-establishment circles, something has gone badly awry.
Capture Is Revealed by Conduct - Capture rarely announces itself.
It reveals itself in tone.
In habits. In the sudden adoption of the very methods one once claimed to oppose.
There was a time when questioning a woman’s sanity in public argument was recognised as coarse and unbecoming.
One might call her mistaken, reckless, even dangerous, but to imply mental instability was understood to be a breach of basic standards of conduct.
A gentleman does not behave this way.
Gentlemanly conduct is not about class or affectation. It is about restraint, proportion, and the refusal to reach for dishonourable weapons when losing an argument.
To accuse an opponent of mental illness is to concede that reason has failed.
It is not courageous. It is mentally lazy.
Psychiatry and Power: A Brief Reminder
Psychiatry’s entanglement with power is not accidental. From its earliest institutional forms, it acquired the authority to define what is “normal,” “acceptable,” and “safe.” That authority has always been tempting to those who govern.
Once such a framework exists, it becomes irresistible. Criminality can be reframed as illness. Dissent as imbalance. Conviction as pathology. The dissenter is no longer wrong, he is unwell.
This manoeuvre is seductive precisely because it bypasses debate. One cannot argue with a diagnosis. One can only submit to it.
Why This Matters Now - Candace Owens represents something profoundly irritating to the managerial class: a coherent, articulate voice that refuses to be managed. She speaks plainly. She does not ask permission.
She does not accept the approved vocabulary.
Such people have always attracted psychiatric suspicion from those who cannot defeat them intellectually.
When figures who claim to oppose authoritarianism begin deploying the same diagnostic language as the authorities, we should take notice. Capture does not always involve money. Sometimes it involves the erosion of standards, the abandonment of good conduct, and the quiet decision that expedience matters more than principle.
The line that must not be crossed - There is a line in civilised discourse. On one side lies disagreement, however fierce. On the other lies dehumanisation. Psychiatry used as insult sits firmly on the wrong side of that line.
To cross it is to admit defeat.
It is also to reveal one’s manners.
A gentleman reaches for facts, logic, wit, or silence. He does not reach for the asylum. He understands that sanity is demonstrated, not proclaimed, and never weaponised.
Final Word - The suggestion that Candace Owens suffers from mental-health issues tells us nothing about her and a great deal about the climate in which such remarks are now made. It is the old authoritarian reflex, lightly polished, deployed by those who ought to know better.
History is unforgiving to those who mistake diagnosis for debate.
And public discourse is poorer for it.
I hope this helps you Alex.
There is so much good work left for you to do. It is a shame to sully your name in this way.
Warmest Regards and a Very Happy Christmas to you and may you receive, all the blessings of the season.
John and Irina Mappin.
@ImMappin
P.S. For those reading this letter who would appreciate simplicity in this matter. Candace is simply seeking clarity over who killed her friend Charlie Kirk, what happened that day and why.
She has some valid questions.
If you can help her get them answered please do so.
You can watch her entire investigation on her U tube Channel.
If you can help her debunk any of the information that is coming to light, please do so.
She would appreciate it.
Just do so politely and with grace, with honesty and with accuracy and we are sure that any disruption that naturally occurs when someone is publicly executed and such a crime is investigated for the truth of what happened, will be kept to a minimum.
N.B. Dont lie.
N.N.B. Don't cover up the lies of others.
I hope this communication is received in the spirit with which it was written.
There are one or two others that might do well to understand this so perhaps you might share it with them too.
Thank You.
@AndrewKolvet Late CK was spiritually led, spoke truth with humor and grace. He always ensured people didn’t feel left out. I watched AMFEST, it was nothing like that.
For the record there is absolutely nothing wrong with Candace Owen’s mental heath.
She simply wants to get to the bottom of who killed Charlie Kirk.
If you can help her with that Alex Jones.
Please do.
If not skip the psychiatric evaluation.
Psychiatry and its methods is what has got us here.
More psychiatry will not help.
If you listened to Tucker’s TPUSA speech, you heard a man:
* Accurately citing and appealing to Scripture
* Unashamedly proclaming Jesus as Lord
* Confessing his own sin and shortcomings
* Begging the Scripture stop being twisted for foreign policy objectives
* Promote peace and oppose unnecessary war
* Frame America’s primary problem as spiritual rather than political
* Affirm the image of God in every man and condemn race-based hostility
He might have said things you don’t like. Heck, endorsing the NLT raised my blood pressure 20 points. He might have even shared opinions you oppose.
But if you listened, and heard those things above, and persist in accusing him of “working for the devil” or continue calling for his cancellation, you’re behaving as an enemy of God.
Yup. I said it. You’re attacking Christ’s servant. You’re working for the wrong team. You’re calling good, evil and evil, good. You’re taking an active part in the fruitless deeds darkness. You’re trying to hide light under a bushel, and extinguish a Christian witness.
Jesus warned his disciples about people like you, in His case the unbelieving Rabbinical Jews who “will put you out of the synagogues. Indeed, the hour is coming when whoever kills you will think he is offering service to God.” (John 16:2)
Think not that you do this on God’s behalf. You’re doing this on the behalf of Satan. “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you.”
And like the Jews who stoned the prophets and then built sepulchers to them, Christians have been praying for God to raise up men in the political realm to proclaim Christ crucified, articulate the gospel, and shine light in the darkness.
And there he is, right there on stage of TPUSA and you immediately denounce him, and demand everyone else denounce him, all because he has a historic Christian view of Israel and wants the American government to put America first.
Instead, you applaud a Barabbas on stage who’s calling for more bloodshed and shout crucify at the Christian calling for peace. God has given us blessings and you reject them. You prefer to curse those who bless Christ and bless those who curse Christ.
So if you want proof of Judaizing in the church, there it is. Because heroizing the unbelieving Jew while rejecting the Christ-confessor with vehement contempt is straight up the most 1st Century Palestinian mob mentality I’ve ever witnessed.