@andrewdoyle_com I am not arguing against anything.
I am starting from your point, which I agree with, and adding my point, because social media is a place where it's possible to share views and combine them.
I have been following and appreciating you for a while.
@andrewdoyle_com Yes. Loop completed. When our beliefs are not conscious, we call our beliefs 'reality'. Therefore, the word 'reality' can mean two things... And that's my point.
@andrewdoyle_com No, reality in itself can't be perverted. Only our understanding can be. The problem is that there is always a mediation between reality and our perception of it: the senses, and the mind. I am 100 % against wokism, only remembering basics. https://t.co/NaSS1BlQzM
@Idontgive2u Moi ça serait plutôt quelques semaines, voire deux ou trois mois. Je me lave bien, avec du savon, et je bien sécher la serviette après, et je n'ai jamais vu de taches dessus. Parfois j'ai envie d'une autre couleur alors je change.
@andrewdoyle_com I think it is, because the excess of today mirrors the lack of yesterday. If Watzlavick titled his book How real is real, it's precisely to point at a confusion between reality and opinion (both being called reality). Then the pendulum goes too far the other way.
@killer_marmot@andrewdoyle_com I agree, but when we talk about reality, we are often talking about what we call reality - precisely because we call it that....
@Knobbyman186880 Hey joyful pig, you've stopped trolling me? Did you realise you were just behaving like a judgemental ignorant? Even if I was one of those ideologically contaminated, your ways would have been wrong.
@Knobbyman186880 Your trolling ways are a bit daft. Intelligence is importance. In 1976 Watzlavick philosopher and psychologist-from the school of Palo Alto - wrote 'How real is real' - At the time, humans needed to take a bit of distance. The pendulum always go too far, and back too far as well
@Knobbyman186880 What makes you think I didn't take a side? I got the pleasure to be harrassed by woke online warriors. They made me loose a good deal of followers - and clients in the process. And the studied the issue - in particular I love Material Girl by Kathleen Stock.
@Knobbyman186880 Other than that, about men and women, I told you biology is valid. As for social constructivism, I would need to study a bit to know what it means exactly.
@Knobbyman186880@andrewdoyle_com Biology is valid.
Everyone lives in their own subjective world. To the extreme, that's schizophrenia. When average, it's called subjectivity. Everyone is quick to confuse their own subjectivity with an objective reality, esp. when individuals agree (intersubjectivity).
@andrewdoyle_com That's not what she is saying, however I remember a book written by Paul Watzlavick in 1976: 'How real is real' Fabulously interesting. Nothing to do with gender or sex, or post modernism. Once upon a time, we needed to question our ideas about reality..https://t.co/NxQzqnyfb6
@theasefountain@andrewdoyle_com These are just basic are rather obvious facts. There is much more to people's worldview's than that. For instance - My neighbour is a bastard. All politicians are corrupt. Life is sad. Every problem has a solution. Immigrants are the problem. Etc. Much more interesting.