1- HTF PD Array
2- Entry model using previous macro (Breaker)
3- Entering on a macro (850am)
@deepsaturno taught the mechanics behind ICTs Pd Arrays. Low risk high reward when you get these right
Giveaway time 🥳 I have 2 @TradingLucid flex accounts giveaway
1 x 50k flex
1 x 25k flex
To enter, like & repost this. Winners will be chosen after the market close today (Thursday).
Good luck!
The U.S. housing market isn’t slowing down, it’s frozen. Homes are massively overpriced, and when prices finally fall, millions of homeowners could lose their equity and banks will be stuck with bad mortgages. This is exactly what happens when decades of easy money inflate asset bubbles across the entire economy.
#PeterSchiff #HousingMarket #EconomicCrisis
I’ve talked about this before, but I want to say it clearly and publicly.
I don’t use prop firm codes. I don’t have affiliate links. I don’t plan to. And this isn’t something I feel the need to debate anymore, it’s a moral decision for me.
The reason is simple: affiliate structures often reward the creator when the trader fails.
Most traders don’t pass on the first attempt. They reset. They buy another evaluation. They try again. When a creator is attached to a code, every reset can turn into commission. That means the business model can benefit from repeated failure from another individual. Even if that’s not the intention, that’s how the structure works.
As a streamer or creator grows, this becomes fuel.
More people use the code → more affiliate revenue.
More revenue → more accounts purchased.
More accounts → more chances to post payouts or show “success.”
More visible success → more attention and growth.
More growth → more people using the code.
It becomes an endless loop.
And honestly, here’s where people need to be careful: sometimes affiliate payouts are portrayed as if they’re trading payouts. There isn’t always clear separation.
If someone is earning from commissions and using that money to fund more accounts, it can amplify the image of success. From the outside, it looks like pure trading performance. Behind the scenes, there may be additional revenue streams feeding that cycle.
I’m not saying every person with a code has bad intentions. I have friends who use affiliate codes and genuinely want to help people. But the structure itself is something you should understand before you participate in it.
If you’re trying to make ends meet, support your family, or build something long-term, this matters.
Trading is not a get-rich-quick path. It’s supposed to be a decades-long skill. It requires budgeting, patience, and sustainability. Constantly cycling through evaluations without a clear financial plan is not sustainable. It’s emotional. And emotion is expensive.
You are not just “joining a community” when you use a code. You are entering a system where your fees generate revenue for someone else, whether you pass or fail. And in many cases, the system works best when people keep restarting.
In trading, and especially in the prop firm space, the statistical reality is that most people fail. The failure rate is extremely high. Whether it’s 80%, 90%, or more, the probability leans heavily toward traders losing, resetting, or quitting.
Make sense now?
My stance is simple:
I don’t want to be incentivized by your resets.
I don’t want to earn from your frustration.
I don’t want my growth tied to how many times you swipe your card using some code.
If this message makes people uncomfortable, that’s okay. It’s not about attacking individuals. It’s about understanding the structure of the space we’re operating in.
Slow down. Create a budget. Define what you actually want from trading, extra income, financial stability, long-term freedom, and build toward that patiently.
The long game requires patience.