“Why do our Ghanaian men keep pursuing Ugandan and Kenyan women instead of us?”
— A woman in the UAE asked a Ugandan lady why Ghanaian men there seem to prefer Ugandan and Kenyan women over Ghanaian women, and she was shocked by the response she received
Scanty If you can’t tell us what really happened behind this on-set apology, then don’t apologize at all else or we will sack you...... See how Ginger is blushing 😂
"Best decision Chelsea have made since Abramovich, a guarantee of success"
Sky Germany's Uli Kohler says Xabi Alonso is an "incredible manager" after he was appointed Chelsea manager today 🔵
This is so cute🥺
Her husband made her a song and played it for her while they were driving
Wait to see her reaction when she found out the song was made for her 🥺❤️
To love and to be loved right❤️
“God bless the police officers who arrested him. He is a wicked man and should be sentenced to 50 years in prison.”
— A Ghanaian man said as he recounted his experience and expressed how elated he was about the arrest of Bright Appiah Danquah, the police officer arrested for allegedly committing multiple robberies targeting Mobile Money vendors
Throwback to one of the most iconic moments in Ghana’s democratic history, when Tsatsu Tsikata rose to his feet during the 2012 Presidential Election Petition and subjected Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia to a cross-examination that many still describe as a masterclass in courtroom advocacy, precision, and intellectual stamina.
That was not noise. That was law.
That was not propaganda. That was preparation meeting experience.
Every question carried weight. Every pause carried pressure. Every contradiction exposed itself. But it also may be where Dr Bawumia showed the world the composure, courage and firm calmness in him.
In that courtroom, Ghana witnessed the difference between political talking points and forensic legal scrutiny. Tsatsu Tsikata did not merely ask questions; he dissected claims, challenged assumptions, and reminded the nation that advocacy is both an art and a discipline.
History will always remember those moments, not just because of the politics involved, but because of the brilliance, composure, and courtroom command on display.
My husband di£d… then his elder brother asked me to have a child for him. When I refused, my mother-in-law told me to either agree or leave the family.
“Four months after I stopped wearing my mourning clothes, my husband’s elder brother called and said he wanted to speak with me. I agreed, but made it clear I wouldn’t return to the village. He said he would come to see me instead, and I accepted.
When he arrived, I wasn’t prepared for what he was about to say. He told me he wanted me to have a child for him. I was shocked and immediately asked why. He explained that he and his wife had been unable to have a child for 17 years, and that he wanted me to bear one for him.
I asked again, “Why me?”
His answer was simple—because he wanted it to be me.
I refused. I told him clearly that I couldn’t do such a thing. No matter how much he pleaded, I stood my ground. I explained that I could not have children for two brothers in the same family. It didn’t feel right to me, and I wasn’t going to agree to it. He became angry and left my house.
That same evening, my mother-in-law called and said she wanted a family meeting. I agreed and went to the village. When I arrived, she didn’t waste time. She asked me directly, almost harshly, “Why did you refuse to have a child for my son?”
I was taken aback. I responded, “Why would I have a child for two brothers in the same family?”
She replied that it was simply because she said so.
When I told her again that I wouldn’t do it, she gave me an ultimatum: either I agree, or I leave the family.
At that moment, I didn’t hesitate. I felt disrespected and pressured into something I could never accept. So I made my decision.
I said, “Fine, I will leave the family.”
Now I’m asking—if you think what I did was wrong, please tell me.
And if you were in my shoes, what would you do…?
Actress Fante Borga who’s suffering from fibroid was in tears throughout my visit to her because she needs money for urgent surgery. You can donate something to support her on 024 402 9638
The Supreme Court of Ghana has settled an interesting question which sometimes comes up in divorce cases. When for instance a wife sues for divorce and names “the other woman" whom she alleges to be having an affair with her husband in her petition, must that woman be joined to the case as a party? (works the other way round as well)
The court answered: not always. Sometimes yes. This is the decision in the case of Vida Yeboah v Dr Stephen Yeboah & Mercy Agyeiwaa decided on 29th April 2026.
In April 2019, Vida Yeboah filed for divorce against her husband, Dr Stephen Yeboah, at the High Court, Agona Swedru. The fact in support of her claim that the marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation was adultery, and she named one Mercy Agyeiwaa as the woman the husband was seeing. According to the petition, the husband had even moved Mercy from Kasoa into a new flat about twenty feet from the matrimonial home in Gomoa Oguaakrom.
When Mercy got wind of the petition, she did not stay quiet. She applied to be joined as a party. Her position was interesting. That she was no side chick. She said she was already the husband's customary wife from 15th July 2012, two whole years before Vida and Stephen's 2014 ordinance wedding. She tendered photographs of the customary ceremony and named witnesses. She also said she had contributed her own money to the very properties Vida was asking the court to share equally.
The High Court allowed her to join. The Court of Appeal threw her out, saying her presence would only "murky the waters". The Supreme Court has now restored her place and sent the matter back to the High Court for trial.
The Supreme Court however cautioned that this judgment is no general invitation for every named "party" to walk into a divorce.
In its own words, persons "commonly referred to in Ghana as 'side chicks' or 'side guys'" generally have no place as parties in a divorce. If the only thing such a person can offer is to admit having had something with someone else's spouse, the most they can ever be is a witness. It noted that Section 12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1971 uses "may", not "shall" and that joinder is at the discretion of the court, not automatic.
What set Mercy apart is that she did not show up with just a denial. She brought two legal issues: a competing customary marriage which, if proved, would invalidate the very marriage Vida wanted dissolved; and a property claim in the assets Vida was asking the court to share equally.
This the court reasoned made her presence necessary for the trial court to settle the matters in dispute.