@CRYPTOCEL00@GBC_Press I could continue to argue with you. However, you have been disrespectful. Allah said: "And when you come across those who mock Our revelations, do not sit with them unless they engage in a different topic." (6:68)
I cannot speak for others, but as for me, I do forgive you.
@15sheriff15@MasterMaliq This is a non sequitur. You’re begging the question by assuming the Bible’s theological framework is the standard by which Islam must be judged. Only someone who already accepts that premise would agree, so the argument is circular.
Again.
@0ifwedenytruth@Badhombre 1) Prove Islam says they are fair game to be raped.
2) Allah commands men to control desire before women to cover: “Tell believing men to lower their gaze and guard chastity. That is purer for them.” (24:30)
3) The virgins in heaven are consenting wives. What is wrong with sex?
@15sheriff15@MasterMaliq Allah said : "Muhammad is no more than a messenger; other messengers have gone before him. If he were to die or to be killed, would you regress into disbelief? Those who do so will not harm Allah whatsoever. And Allah will reward those who are grateful." (3:144)
@15sheriff15@MasterMaliq This is a non sequitur. You’re begging the question by assuming the Bible’s theological framework is the standard by which Islam must be judged. Only someone who already accepts that premise would agree, so the argument is circular.
@Gargix0x@AncientPak@AsianDigest@PukhtunPetriot3@_Indus_@MDUmairKh First, you have not presented an argument. Second, your message begs the question by assuming that Islam began with Muhammad ﷺ, which is the claim you need to prove. You cannot substantiate a claim by simply restating it as a premise.
@CRYPTOCEL00@GBC_Press Rape is a sin in Islam deserving death penalty. Rapists should be judged accordingly. Do not let them make you hate Islam.
Allah said: "Good and evil cannot be equal. Respond ˹to evil˺ with what is best, then the one you are in a feud with will be like a close friend." (41:34)
@IslamSeries First, what’s wrong here?
Second, you cherry-picked hadiths about specific rewards and ignored the far more common mentions of peace, gardens, rivers, palaces, seeing Allah, etc., making Islam seem focused only on that.
Still again, what’s wrong?
@Flipparmax345 Destroying idols/statues is generally considered obligatory when Muslims have authority and ability, especially if worshipped. So the Taliban destroying the Buddha statues was Islamically allowed/rewarded.
“Historical heritage” is not a valid excuse to preserve them.
@oummoulhasan@3arbi_neuille@N4w4fKholin "O believers! Do not let some ridicule others, they may be better than them, nor let women ridicule other women, they may be better than them. Do not defame one another, nor call each other by offensive nicknames." (49:11)
May Allah bless both of you, please take this advice.
@alphadelta66969 Generality is from the wording: “𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 the Messenger gives you, take; 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 he forbids, abstain.” Fay' doesn’t restrict a general text. “Only delivery” means he can’t force belief, not that he can’t explain/legislate by Allah’s authority (59:7; 4:65; 33:36).
@alphadelta66969 It proves the point. Allah says the fay' belongs/distributed by the Messenger, then immediately gives the rule: “whatever the Messenger gives you, take it…” The sabab is fay', but the wording is general. The general wording is not restricted to the cause unless there’s evidence.
@alphadelta66969 Loanwords don’t prove that the thing named originated in that language. Allah uses the Arabic word known to His audience for Isa’s ﷺ revelation. Your claim has too many assumptions for me to debate it, and I think I have said enough. Therefore, I will end this conversation here.