@boreddeleuzian This is the same logic for people who don’t produce gametes. Them not having an output doesn’t mean they don’t have a sex. Their sex is based on the arrangement of their body, that results in that output. Not the output itself.
@jakozloski If women is the opposite of men, then they have a high threshold for casual and a low threshold for marriage. So saying they would marry doesn’t communicate that they are sexually interested in the partner.
@kevmcq7@lostghostsoul Maybe try this; I don’t see you as someone I could have a deep emotional connection with, you are someone I could have sex with for the rest of my life.
@banananercream They aren’t secret police. But aside from that, they are enforcing the law. If you have constitutional issue with it’s enforcement, bring suit against the law.
@God_Questioner You have to make the moral argument. I disagree, bc the mother has a duty of care for choosing to create the human.
Duty of care overrides the need for continuous consent to care.
@lostghostsoul Largely, yes. They would prefer to have a sexual relationship over the other things in a marriage, like paying bills, or providing emotional support.
@CoreyT1221@Daisycat32@ariadotwav@14th_Choice But, because I can put aside inconsistencies and work within the framework of a hypothetical that couldn’t be reality, I answered in the way I would, If the nonsensical situation presented itself.