@YankeeGunner Call me crazy but I’d prefer a challenge system. You get 2 challenges, if you are wrong you lose a sub. Then the play is looked at with a fresh lens, and non of this clear and obvious error stuff. Maybe offsides are always reviewed given their in theory “more objective” nature
@scottjwillis How is Crystal Palace away an easier game for us than Man City’s CP at home (89 vs 95 rating)? Same question but flipped for Chelsea? Is that just a typo?
@scottjwillis I’d love to see the table you’ve done in past years with the average difficulty rating + expected points for Arsenal and Man City’s remaining fixtures
@scottjwillis The model has such high likelihood that the top 3 finish in Champions league spots. Does that feel realistic? I guess this doesn’t take into account injuries which would be the most likely driver of any of those teams finishing outside of those spots?
@YankeeGunner Osimhen feels like a very similar profile to me (up for debate which of them is more refined). Do you think that different option would benefit the team or too disruptive to our style?
@Carra23 I think it is a bit of both. My eye test suggests that we are tactically choosing to slow the play and make fewer agressive passes forward so that we can have more control and reduce risk. Arteta has definitely made changes to skew more towards risk free play
@Dhudlin007@YankeeGunner @FA_PGMOL Don’t there need to be 2 players keeping a player onside. Gordon was on the goal side of Raya. He was a good yard offside, plain to see
@YankeeGunner The brutal thing is that closing this loophole only protects Chelsea because now no one else can do it and half of Chelsea’s contracts will continue to operate under it
@_clc7@oh_that_crab Based on the stat! I’m saying Meslier is good but performed really poorly based on the metric, which is making me not trust the metric