Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive

Very legal and very cool. My contributions to the legal twitterature are almost exclusively GIF-related. When in doubt, assume sarcasm. she/her

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@mccullighl @ClaytonsJustice @LethalLauren904 Good point -- I'm pretty sure Jan did testify to that in one of the bankruptcy dumpster fire filings/hearings.

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@ClaytonsJustice I'm sure this has been questioned billions of times already, but how is she Ronn's primary caregiver when Jan also lives with him, in the same bedroom in fact? (& yes, I know the point of this is to keep laying the groundwork for her not being able to be incarcerated bc of Ronn)

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@DouglasWei43233 @MightBeUrDaddy8 One might even go so far as to say that it's not just permissible--it's the whole point of juries to develop opinions and reach conclusions after hearing all the evidence...

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@DavidSGingras Hope you and Aurora are doing well. (Side note: I almost named my now 11-year-old daughter Aurora -- love that name)

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@missak1979 @LawyerYouKnow Such a stupid decision.

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@LawyerYouKnow

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@EvansLabathe @JulieCourtTV When exactly did he supposedly go retrieve the lunch? I didn't hear it in his step-by-step inch-by-inch accounting of everything.

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@RGThibs @cathyrusson https://t.co/XxWpo9yMXA

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@dothardy @cathyrusson Looks like he works at IRS (which is where Banfield worked)... https://t.co/xwDzU1OoOk

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@dothardy @cathyrusson Looks like he works at IRS (which is where Banfield worked)... https://t.co/xwDzU1OoOk

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@slaveto3bassets @cathyrusson Looks like he works at IRS... https://t.co/xwDzU1OoOk

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@LawyerYouKnow "Murder in the first degree
"There are two different degrees of murder: murder in the first degree and murder in the second degree. If you find the defendant guilty of murder, you shall decide the degree of murder. . . ." [see pic for the rest]

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@LawyerYouKnow Just FYI, you should check out the MA pattern jury instructions for M1. If the jury can't come to a unanimous decision on M1, they are then supposed to consider M2. So a lesser is essentially baked into the instruction. https://t.co/uesdqzezcv

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@HouseOfChatter @ClaytonsJustice It says that the judge signed it on 11/3, so, not too late. It was formally filed by the clerk on 11/4 (the hearing was 11/5).

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

.@LawyerYouKnow This needs to be your next emergency live: FL 2d DCA grants JHACH a new trial because trial court interpreted and applied Section 39 immunity too narrowly and it pervaded the entire trial.
Opinion here:
https://t.co/DKsQEyor4s

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@ClaytonsJustice @DNealz @DavidSGingras @YouTube what up Key Cult Leader

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@DupayNoel @LawyerYouKnow The original defendant(s) (ie, the bars &/or Karen Read) are the only ones able to remove a case to fed court under the fed removal statute. Even if 3d-party Defs are added, SCOTUS says they don't count for removal. (But I don't think they'll be able to add those parties anyway.)

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@LawyerYouKnow So, while Karen Read might end up suing in D Mass or MSP et al might remove a future case brought by KR to federal court, I don’t believe that this *current* case can go there, even if they are successful adding the 3d-party claims (which I don’t think meet the MRCP 14 criteria).

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@LawyerYouKnow You can’t remove a case to federal court if the original complaint couldn’t be filed in federal court, per s. 1441 (removal statute). And SCOTUS recently-ish said only original Ds can remove a case, not to include third-party Ds or counter-defendants.
https://t.co/nauwXNeO53

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@michelleL_13 @LawyerYouKnow You didn't ask me, obvs, but as an atty (in MA), I think it's bonkers to to try to bring those claims as 3d-party claims in this case. They'd need to say that the 3d parties are *derivatively or secondarily liable*. Involving the same facts is literally not the standard at all.

[Oxford Comma, Split Infinitive @oxfordcommander]

@stacymqc77 @FreeKarenRead3 Yes they did. I respect it.