Oxlade

Onchain/Retro player

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

@Predictefy 0-0

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

@lmts_football @cjhtech 0-2

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

I’m trading future events on BNB’s newest prediction market.

Get 10% off your trading fees when you join me on @Predictdotfun.

https://t.co/P4yY4qRmi2

[Limitless @trylimitless]

https://t.co/lTLZqYBSsP

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

@trylimitless @BNBCHAIN 8% to binance then?

[Paradex @paradex]

Almost time for the Badger Brawl,

Answer the call or miss it all.

Waitlist’s live, don’t wait too long,

24 hours — then it’s gone.

https://t.co/0jezGSibYf

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

Just unlocked the Early Quacker on @wallchain_xyz 🏆

How cool is that?

Feels great to have my contributions recognized.

How’s Wallchain Quacks been treating you so far?

Not on board yet? Drop a comment for an invite 👇🦆

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

#openseatouchgrass @opensea

[astros37 @astros3777]

@Gate_io has stolen my funds.

While the LA/USDT price was around $0.50 on other CEXes, Gate manipulated it and pumped it to $25. As a result, many traders were liquidated. I saw reports that around $18 million was extracted during the liquidation.

There has been no response from support. No refunds.

Gate, you have two options: restore your reputation — or become just another crypto scam.

Roll back all affected balances and let justice prevail.

Please help us @zachxbt @SECGov

$gate $gt #gate #gatescam #scam

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

Join Paradex with my referral link, trade like a real degen 😈 and enjoy a 5% discount on fees! 🤑 What are you waiting for? https://t.co/LtPiFyCL94

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

Yap early, yap only, yap often.

@_kaitoai is connecting AI, attention and capital with Yaps.

Just claimed my social card and I'm accumulating Yap points in real-time.

Claim yours 👉 https://t.co/KbZbEiSPzp

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

I just claimed my Flux on @satflow

The pro trading marketplace for Bitcoin Ordinals and Runes with zero fees and mempool snipe protection

https://t.co/rUfOdqNazi

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

2024 was a wild ride.

Wins, losses, chaos, and moments that made it all worth it—my wallet lived it all.

@IntractCampaign @Optimism turned those moments into something unforgettable.

See your own story come to life with IntractRewind2024 👉

https://t.co/1XRS7tEeAs

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

@PrimordialAA I absolutely agree that only farmers will spend thousands on fees. Real users 15-20$

[Spectrum.eth 🦇🔊 @Spectrum__eth]

TBH I have two wallets that are seriously tied with L0 one I used organically and has about 20$ in fees over close to a year… and I have one where I actually had the intent to farm around 150 tx with 364$ in fees..

I’ve asked normal users around me and many organics that are hoping for an airdrop are around the $20 mark in fees.

As a fact only farmers go for crazy high fees because generally they did crazy high tx.

I already saw ZK fuck up I’m just voicing to hope L0 doesn’t do same.

The issue with ZK was supply distributed was too concentrated and people who actually spent months/years on it were excluded hence poor sentiment.

I qualified for ZK so this isn’t fud just my opinions as an old car on the block.

I understand you are trying to make things work around your 8% intentions.. an increase of 2% to 10% and maybe rfp reduces by 1% could help make the numbers work.

What do you think bro?

[Oxlade @OxladeOnChain]

@PrimordialAA

[cypher pepe @cypher_frog]

The cocksucker and shit-eating project @LayerZero_Labs . Why? The fuckers talked about how they would carefully approach the issue of searching for sybils, as a result, they marked my main wallet, where there are more than 200 transactions in Ethereum, various SocialFi, ENS/🧵⤵️

[Axel Bitblaze 🪓 @Axel_bitblaze69]

3/

Dont believe me ?

▹ Go to any dune dashboard and filter it via any two parameters. I have done it via transactions and volume:

Here are the results,

All the listed wallets have the same type of stats.

[CC2 @CC2Ventures]

k its actually over

They call it immutable, censorship-resistant, and PERMISSIONLESS, meaning anyone can built on it

And then proceed to filter users for utilizing the #2 most-used dApp across the board, that rakes them a massive amount of $$$, with an actual good use case (Refuel)

Their CEO even QT'd an 'useless nft and bridge' contract, which is essentially the same thing - you just have to interact with the smart contract directly instead of a frontend dApp

https://t.co/6tI73TC9GR

(will find the exact quote tweet in a bit)

LayerZero endorses @gasdotzip which uses the EXACT SAME Refuel Contracts as @merkly_com, and even hopped on spaces with them, why is GasZip not mentioned?

It doesn't have 'vaporware NFT bridging', but has an equally similar vaporware tool, also known LZ Inscriptions (equally as useless): https://t.co/TVj0pA84Yr
https://t.co/LFztfgXm3Y - this one also looks oddly familiar

@OmniX_NFT also has 'useless ONFT' bridging, BUT adds pictures on the frontend (instead of hiding them) and has both LZ founders as seed investors, so naturally they don't get excluded

@holographxyz is ONFT bridging-only, but doesn't get filtered because it has a bunch of VCs behind them and adds some nice pictures on the front-end, despite their leaderboard incentivizing spamming ONT bridging

Not meaning to talk down on Omni X and Holograph, as I like both teams behind the projects and have been in contact with them, just laying out my points

Why add projects to your ecosystem page if you just proceed to filter them out in the end and not give a warning in advance that this will honeypot your userbase for using the second most grossing dApp?

Very interesting that the latter two weren't mentioned while serving the exact same purpose

Very permissionless, and not favoritism at all

Good enough to milk fees and adding it to your pages, but when push comes to shove, you filter it all LMAO

'Build anything on LayerZero, but if you build something we don't like and it gets used a lot (despite us tweeting about ONFTs and endorsing certain projects), we will simply honeypot you and auto-mark you as sybil for a specific interaction'

They classify sybil behavior as engaging with certain supported LZ interactions, and not by sybil attacking the project with a plethora of addresses, while also employing double standards for specific projects they invested in or have close ties to

Good luck filtering 50% of your user base and your biggest supporters