🚨 NEW: Not even 24 HOURS after Keir Starmer says he'll be prime minister for the next 8 YEARS, Labour sources are saying that he will resign *THIS WEEK*.
BUCKLE UP! The vile traitor is about to be dragged out of No.10 in disgrace.
THIS IS GOING TO BE WONDERFUL! 🎉
🚨BREAKING: The King WILL NOT issue a Easter message this year, Buckingham Palace has confirmed 🇬🇧
The King of England and “defender of the faith” will not even say happy Easter on the most holiest of days in the Christian calendar.
Absolutely disgusting - #NotMyKing
Can we all Retweet and Share Please.
We all want to know what is happening with the Violent thugs who broke a female police officer’s nose at Manchester Airport.
@YvetteCooperMP@ukhomeoffice
Cadburys Easter eggs are being boycotted in all shops! People do not want palm oil they want the proper eggs we used to have! Get it off the shelves! Boycott Cadbury!
So, enter a football ground without a ticket is now a criminal offence.
Enter the UK with no documents and they put you up in hotel feed and clothe you!
PE Teacher Banned for Life – Just for Saying Migrants Should Respect Our Laws or Leave
A PE teacher in Darlington has been banned from ever teaching again – not for anything he did in the classroom, but for a few posts he made on his personal X account.
Sam Everett wrote things a lot of people quietly think:
"If you don’t respect our laws, culture and way of life you should leave, nobody is forcing you to stay."
And in another reply: "They can live in societies where their values are accepted, it isn’t here. Leave. You won’t be missed."
Someone reported him, the posts were dug up, and the whole thing went to a misconduct panel. The panel actually cleared him of racism or sexism. They said he showed genuine remorse, had a spotless record before this, deleted the posts, and posed no risk of doing it again. Their recommendation? Let him keep teaching.
Then the Department for Education stepped in and overruled them. Banned him indefinitely.
Their reasoning: the comments were "offensive", suggested intolerance, and one mention of using the navy to stop Channel crossings was enough to "undermine public confidence in the teaching profession".
So here we are in 2026: a teacher with no complaints in his entire career loses everything because he expressed a view – on his own time, on his own account – that millions of ordinary people share. Even the people who investigated him thought it was okay for him to carry on.
This isn't really about racism or misconduct anymore. It's about whether you're allowed to have an opinion that doesn't match the official line on immigration. Step outside that line and the system will make an example of you, no matter how clean your record is.
What kind of message does that send to every other teacher?
Keep quiet, or else.
Replacing Churchill With a Puffin: The Quiet Erasure of Britain
The Bank of England has made its decision. Churchill goes. Turner goes. Jane Austen goes. Alan Turing goes. In their place, wildlife. A stoat, perhaps. A puffin. A hedgehog. The consultation found it popular. The anti-counterfeiting argument was sound. And so, without a parliamentary debate, without a public vote, without anyone in authority pausing to ask what it means to remove the faces of the people who built and saved this country from its own currency, it was quietly done. This is how erasure works. With a consultation and a press release.
Churchill's face on the five pound note is not decoration. It's a daily reminder that Britain has a history worth being proud of. That the people who shaped and defended this nation deserve to be remembered. And that national identity is something real. Hand over a fiver for a coffee and catch a glimpse of the man who stood between Western civilisation and Nazi conquest. The man who refused to negotiate when every pressure was on him to do so. The man who defined British resolve at its finest hour. Replace him with a puffin and you have made a statement about what Britain now thinks of itself. You have made it to every man, woman and child in the country. Without a debate. Without a vote. Without asking anyone.
That is the pattern. It's always quiet. It's always administrative. It's always defended on its own terms, as common sense, as progress, as a neutral technical decision. Statues fall to angry mobs and the establishment calls it a moment of reckoning. Street names are changed by council committees and it's called sensitivity. The curriculum is rewritten by academics and it's called balance. And now the currency is stripped of the faces that connect a people to their past, and it's called anti-counterfeiting policy.
Individually each decision is defensible. Cumulatively they form a pattern that is not accidental. The institutions entrusted with stewarding British identity have been captured by people who regard that identity as a problem to be managed rather than an inheritance to be protected. The long march through the institutions that began in the universities and the civil service fifty years ago has reached the point where it makes decisions about whose face appears on your money, and nobody with the power to stop it seems minded to try.
The consequences are not abstract. A population severed from its history, its symbols and its heroes loses the connective tissue of national identity. It cannot defend what it no longer recognises. It cannot demand loyalty to values it has been taught to be ashamed of. Lebanon's Christians believed their country was too civilised, too plural, too decent to fall. They were right about the decency. They were wrong about what decency alone can protect. Britain is making the same error by different means. You do not need armed factions to hollow out a nation. You need a Bank of England consultation, a university diversity committee, and fifty years of patience.
Churchill understood what was at stake when identity and resolve were under pressure. He said so, repeatedly, in language that would today be considered inflammatory by the very institutions that once celebrated him. The irony of removing his face from the currency of a country he saved, in an era when the threats he warned against have taken new forms, is apparently lost on the people who made that decision.
A stoat will never evoke what Churchill evoked. That is not sentiment. That is the point. The replacement of meaning with the merely decorative is not a neutral act. It's a statement about what a nation values, made quietly, by people who were not elected to make it, and cannot be held to account for having done so.
If we cannot defend the face on a banknote, we will not defend what that face represented. And the people dismantling it, piece by piece, consultation by consultation, know that perfectly well.
Totally shocking by our Prime Minister that twice Siobahn White, mother of Rhiannon, 27, who was stabbed to death by an illegal migrant from Sudan, has written to Starmer for a meeting and neither time received even the courtesy of a reply.
Starmer wouldn’t have looked on Siobahn as somebody in need of answers and a public embracing of her grief but as a political danger as he has done nothing to stop these killers coming to our shores.
She told The Telegraph; “Starmer wants to go out there and apologise to Epstein’s victims but what about ourwomen and children?
“ What about my daughter? What about my grandson who had got to grow up without a mother?”
Great points that need answers. If Starmer can’t deliver them, and won’t even respond to a distraught mother, it’s time Labour MPs rose up and threw him out
Happy to be corrected by naval experts. But by my calculations the entire Royal Navy surface fleet of warships consists of:
Two aircraft carriers
Six Type 45 destroyers
Seven aging Type 23s
And of these 15 warships only three are currently active (soon to be four if HMS Dragon leaves port tomorrow.
In any sensible estimation of deployable capability we don’t really have a Navy, do we?