‼️ Urgent Request ‼️
Different govts are using backlog as an excuse to increase reservation beyond 50%.
Therefore we need some help in understanding the legal directions on this issue.
Can people share legal provisions/court judgements regarding filling backlog vacancies?
सवर्णों का आंदोलन पहुँच रहा है दिल्ली! देश के अलग-अलग कोने से सवर्ण अधिकारों को ले कर हज़ारों लोग दिल्ली के लिए तैयार हो रहे हैं क्योंकि भाजपा को यही एक भाषा समझ में आती है। @RHAreforms इस आंदोलन को अपना वैचारिक समर्थन दे��ा है।
‼️𝗔𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗚𝗖𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗨𝗣, 𝗨𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗸𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱, 𝗣𝘂𝗻𝗷𝗮𝗯 & 𝗲𝘃���𝗿𝘆𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲‼️
𝗜𝗻 6 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀, 𝗕𝗝𝗣 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝗮𝗹𝗹-𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝗿 𝗼𝗻 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 50% 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗲𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁
BJP govts in 6 states are using the might of the State to anyhow breach the 50% reservation ceiling limt.
BJP has launched a frontal attack on GCs through it's state power.
If BJP wins even one of the above cases, they will use to justify over 70% reservation everywhere.
But General Category will have to win all the 6 cases to ensure that reservation is kept within 50% limt and GC children & youth are left with some minimum rights to livelihood.
Only a few General Category individuals & organizations are fighting it out in the courts against BJP's battery of lawyers.
Following are the important cases and the date of hearing:
72% 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗵𝘁𝗿𝗮 - Next hearing in Bombay High Court on 23.10.2026
91% 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗮 𝗶𝗻 4 𝗨𝗣 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗲𝘀 - Next hearing in Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court on 26.10.2026. In this case, despite the HC order on 16.09.2026 to implement only 50% quota, UP state govt has not issued any notification. They are still arguing in the courts for 91% quota.
64% 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝗥𝗮𝗷𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻: Next hearing in Jodhpur High Court on 28.10.2026
68% 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗴𝗮𝗿𝗵: Next hearing in Supreme Court on 04.12.2026
*73% 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗣:* The BJP govt of MP has filed a SLP challenging the MP High Court judgement that declared 73% quota as unconstitutional. The case is expected to be listed in the last week of October
75% 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝗕𝗶𝗵𝗮𝗿: The BJP-JDU govt has filed SLP challenging the patna High Court judgement that declared 75% quota as unconstitutional. The next date of hearing is not decided.
There is only one difference between Rahul Gandhi & BJP:
-Rahul Gandhi's view is that there is a constitutional limit of 50% in reservation & hence consitution need to be amended to cross 50%.
-While BJP is of the view that there is no 50% limit to reservation even today & hence reservation can reach 75% or more even today. This is the argument that BJP is making in all the cases in the High Courts & Supreme Court through it's top notch battery of lawyers.
Only request to GCs of UP, Uttarakhand, Punjab & everywhere is-
Don't go by the empty political speeches & be a bonded labour to BJP or any other party.
If you can't directly fight cases, please question BJP leaders, karyakartas, ministers when they come for your votes.
Please make your friends and relatives resign from party positions even though the position may be minor.
𝗪𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗴𝘁𝗵 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝗻 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗯𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲.
Remember how, amid chants of Allah-u-Akbar, the State had granted thousands of Muslims to bid a teary-eyed farewell to SA Basha, mastermind of the Coimbatore terror attack that killed 58? Well, today the State has granted parole to five of his accomplices.
You can't do anything.
For over a year now, anti-India racism on X has enjoyed freakish reach, engagement/payouts. Every Indian here has watched it happen. Racism against Indians literally incentivised, the X algorithm pours monetisation fuel on it.
Now a mass shooting plan by a white terrorist at a Hindu temple in Chicago has been foiled.
Hate spills from SM into real life, the people tweaking the algorithm will have blood on their hands.
जो आपको कहते हैं कि "अरे कुछ मत बोलो, कांग्रेस आयी तो आरक्षण बढ़ा देगी",
उनको ये खबर दिखाकर पूछें क��� 73% आरक्षण कौन बढ़ा रहा है?
और 2020 से ही कोर्ट के बार-बार मना करने पर भी कौन आरक्षण बढ़ाने की कोशिश किये जा रहा है?
इसके बाद भी जो इसका समर्थन करें, वो पार्टी के मजदूर हैं! उनको ना हिंदुत्व से, ना देश से मतलब है! उनका मकसद सिर्फ और सिर्फ पार्टी बचाना है ताकि उनका कैरियर बचा रहे और वो बेरोजगार ना हो जाएं!
और ऐसे लोगों की बातों में आने की ज़रूरत नहीं!
तो हिंदुत्व का चूरण साइड में रखें और फ़िलहाल अपने और देश के भविष्य का सोचें, जिसे वोट के चक्कर में ये पार्टी बर्बाद करने में लगी है!
धन्यवाद🙏
#BJPAgainstGC
We don’t hype Dinkar enough. Read these four stanzas to witness absolute genius! Every word remains undeniably true across time, generations and species.
क्षमा, दया, तप, त्याग, मनोबल, सबका लिया सहारा,
पर नर-व्याघ्र सुयोधन तुमसे, कहो, कहाँ, कब हारा?
(You tried forgiveness, patience, and sacrifice, but did Duryodhana ever back down because of your restraint?)
क्षमाशील हो रिपु-समक्ष, तुम हुये विनत जितना ही,
दुष्ट कौरवों ने तुमको, कायर समझा उतना ही।
(The more humble you were before your enemies, the more they dismissed you as a coward.)
अत्याचार सहन करने का, कुफल यही होता है,
पौरुष का आतंक मनुज, कोमल होकर खोता है।
(When a person becomes excessively soft and passive, they lose the healthy fear or respect that their strength and valor ought to command in others.)
क्षमा शोभती उस भुजंग को, जिसके पास गरल हो,
उसका क्या जो दंतहीन, विषरहित, विनीत, सरल हो।
(Forgiveness is a noble attribute only for a venomous snake that commands fear. What value or dignity is there in the "forgiveness" of a snake that has no teeth, carries no venom, and is inherently harmless and meek?)
एक ही दिल है मोदी जी! पत्नी केस करे मोदी एक्ट का, पति गवाही दे दे, दलाल बात करे और प्रति केस ₹2.5 लाख की कमाई!
ओ हो हो हो, ओ हो हो हो, ओ हो हो, हो हो
इक्स तेरा तड़पाबे…
One family filed 21 cases under the SC/ST Act, 14 against a single family, forcing them to face 42 court hearings every month.
Villagers told us that the ‘oppressed’ family received ₹46 lakh in compensation. People now fear speaking about it openly.
But off camera, everyone tells the same story about a ‘business model’ built around SC/ST cases.
How a law meant to prevent atrocities became a tool for profit. Watch @Keshavmalan93’s special investigation to find out.
⚠️ IF THAT FLYDUBAI PLANE HAD CRASHED…
1️⃣ The Indian pilot would have been blamed instantly.
2️⃣ Racists would have flooded social media with “Indian pilots” narratives before investigators even reached the wreckage.
3️⃣ Pakistani troll accounts would have amplified it, turning a tragedy into another India-bashing opportunity.
4️⃣ AI171 and the Phuket incidents would have been dragged in as evidence of a “pattern of behaviour” of Indian pilots.
5️⃣ Every unrelated Indian aviation incident would suddenly have become part of a narrative about supposedly “unsafe Indian pilots”.
6️⃣ Meanwhile, Oman’s lack of any meaningful history of aviation terrorism would have been used to bolster the India pilot angle.
7️⃣ If Indian pilot Capt Smit hadn’t survived & fought back to save the plane, the world would have got an entirely different story.
Captain Smit Machchhar is a HERO.
In the face of the gravest danger and despite being seriously injured, he showed immense courage and an unwavering resolve to protect the lives of others.
His valour helped save hundreds of lives and avert a great tragedy.
India is proud of Captain Machchhar.
Praying for his speedy recovery, renewed strength and good health.
The pilot who was stabbed on FlyDubai flight 1073 has been identified as Captain Smit Machchhar, an Indian national based in Dubai, reports @ariel_oseran.
We are praying for Captain Machchhar’s recovery🙏
This man is a hero.
Captain Smit Machchhar, the Indian captain of flydubai Flight 1073, fought back after being stabbed in the cockpit.
Despite being severely injured, he managed to unlock the cockpit door - allowing Israeli passengers and the Emirati crew to intervene and save all the passengers.
Together, their extraordinary courage saved 174 lives.
Indian. Israeli. Emirati.
Different nationalities. One extraordinary act of courage. 🇮🇳🇮🇱🇦🇪
We wish Captain Machchhar a full and speedy recovery.
My salute to the Indian pilot Captain Smit Machchhar for his extraordinary bravery.
Despite being stabbed and seriously injured, he fought back, resisted, opened the cockpit door, and enabled passengers and crew to overpower the attacker — preventing a catastrophic mid-air disaster.
He saved the lives of 174 people, including Israeli citizens and other nationals.
I wish Captain Machchhar a speedy and full recovery.
He is a true hero.
IIT बॉम्बे के छात्र की जान जातिवाद की वजह से नहीं गयी,
लेकिन देवा द्विवेदी की गई है!!
22 साल के देवा द्विवेदी ने SC/ST एक्ट लगाए जाने और उससे हुए मानसिक दबाव में आत्महत्या कर ली!
तो अब देवा को न्याय कौन देगा?
SC/ST एक्ट हटाओ या अब सवर्ण atrocity एक्ट भी दो!
बहुत हुआ!
साहिल वकोड़े IIT बॉम्बे के छात्र थे। परीक्षा चल रही थी। पूरा प्रश्नपत्र AI एप्प को अपलोड कर के उत्तर कॉपी में लिख रहे थे। प्रोफेसर ने पकड़ लिया। बाहर ले गए, डाँटा और कहा कि संस्थान के नियम स्पष्ट हैं आप चोरी करते पकड़े गए तो सस्पेंड किए जा सकते हो।
साहिल ने बाद में आत्महत्या कर ली। माँ-बाप ने पोस्टमार्टम के बाद भी शव नहीं लिया क्योंकि उन्हें न्याय चाहिए। न्याय पाने के लिए उन्होंने मोदी एक्ट की धाराएँ लगवा दीं प्रोफेसर पर।
एक लड़का आरक्षण से IIT पहुँचा। कम नंबर न आए, इसलिए चोरी कर रहा था। वह टॉपर बनना चाह रहा था। पर एक मनुवादी शिक���षक ने उसे कॉलेज के कानून बताए, सस्पेंड किया भी नहीं। उसने आत्महत्या कर ली।
क्या एक दलित को फोन ले जाने अनुमति नहीं होनी चाहिए? क्या ऐतिहासिक प्रताड़ना के कारण उसको ओपन मोबाइल परीक्षा देने की अनुमति नहीं होनी चाहिए?
आज एक ब्राइट स्टूडेंट, जो जे�� इंजन बना सकता था AI से पूछ कर, हमारे बीच इसलिए नहीं रहा क्योंकि उससे पहले ही चरण में रोक लिया गया। मोदी एक्ट इसीलिए बना ही है।
प्रोफेसर को फाँसी होनी चाहिए।
Dear @Javedakhtarjadu. I'm afraid your response is as boring and overloaded as your similes and metaphors. When countered with facts, you shift the goalpost, bring in the RSS, berate the right wing, take refuge in context, cushion the bigotry, and claim Kafirs were Colonialists not Hindus.
I know countering you again is like watering a cactus and praying for leechis, but in the hope that all that knee massaging with Doctor Ortho would have sprouted some neurons, here goes:
You asked for a source because you said the quote was “quite unlike” Azad’s “lifelong sociopolitical stances.” I gave you the source: Calcutta, 27 October 1914, published in Khutbat-e-Azad. The words are his. That should have ended the enquiry. It did not. So let us walk through your new script, line by line.
1. “The khutbats were about Khilafat and British colonialism.”
Yes. That is what I wrote. Maulana Azad was telling Indian Muslims that a Turk’s battlefield thorn must be felt in a Hindustani Muslim’s heart; that Millat-e-Islam is one body; that friendship and enmity are for the religion of Allah. Then he quoted Quran 48:29 and added his own gloss: be extremely hard against disbelievers, extremely kind among yourselves, and do not pass over this as if you had not heard it. You asked for the when and where. You received both. “It was about Khilafat” is not a rebuttal. It is the context in which he said it.
2. “To claim he was quoting this about the Hindus of India will not be true. The Kafir here was the colonialist.”
I did not say the 1914 speech was a municipal circular against the Hindus of Howrah. I quoted what Azad quoted: a Quranic verse about kuffar, and his commentary on unbelief, Tawhid, and hardness toward disbelievers. If Azad had meant “kafir = only the British officer,” he knew Urdu enough to say Angrez. He did not. He used the Book’s word, then told his flock not to skip it.
And if “kafir” in Azad’s mouth was a temporary colonial nickname, kindly explain the 1920 Hijrat fatwa, published in Ahl-e-Hadith of Amritsar, in which he said Indian Muslims had no choice but to migrate, and that those who stayed and kept connection with “the enemy of Islam” would themselves be counted as the enemy of Islam. That is not a lecture on income-tax collectors. That is a theology of the land.
3. “When Ataturk took over, Azad called it a closed chapter and condoned the secular government.”
Men change. Texts do not. If later Azad made peace with the death of the Caliphate, good for the later Azad. It does not unsay 1914, nor the Khilafat years, nor Masala-e-Khilafat, nor the call that any government hostile to Turkey was hostile to Islam, not the belief in the Quranic verse damning the Kafirs. You began by saying the paragraph was unlike his lifelong stances. Lifelong includes the years he spent as a pan-Islamist firebrand. Evolution is not an eraser. It is a timeline.
4. “Read his Calcutta High Court statement. An honour no member of the Mahasabha or RSS was ever given.”
Sedition charges from the Raj are not a unique family heirloom. Tilak got them. Aurobindo got them. Savarkar was given two life terms and sent to Cellular Jail, where the honour included the oil mill, the lash, and years in a cell the size of a cupboard.
And of course, knowing your pitiful knowledge of Indian History, I guess you would not know legendary RSS names like Devipad Chaudhary, Jagatpati Kumar, Anna Saheb Deshpande, Ramakant Keshav, Vasantrao Oak, Narayan Singh, Chandrakant Bhardwaj, Dada Naik Chimur, Baburao Begade, Lala Hansraj, Balaji Raipurkar who participated in our freedom struggle and were jailed or shot.
5. “Azad was in British jails for nine years. Name one from your right wing who can match that.”
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar: roughly a decade in Kala Pani, further years in mainland jails, then thirteen years of internment in Ratnagiri. Sentence on paper: fifty years. Conditions: not Ahmednagar Fort with time to write Ghubar-e-Khatir.
By the way, you might know that your great-great-grandfather Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi was also incarcerated at Kala Pani. What you might not know, or would want to hide, is that he wrote a grovelling mercy petition to the British, pleading to be released.
6. “In 1946 Jinnah refused to shake Azad’s hand. He hated Azad for his patriotism.”
How does this turn “be severe against the kafirs, merciful among themselves” into a sonnet about communal harmony? A man can spend 1946 refusing Partition and still have spent 1914 telling Indian Muslims that their first body is the ummah. Fairness is holding both pages open. What you are doing is hiding the 1914 page and waving the 1946 one like a flag.
7. “Your reference to Rahul Gandhi was unnecessary, I expect decency and class.”
And I expected you to have some sense of humour. The PS was a reminder that this is the second time I have had to fetch your hero’s paperwork. Last time it was Nehru’s India: books banned, editors sacked, films blocked, Majrooh jailed for a couplet.
You lecture me on class after moving from “this cannot be Azad” to “it is Azad but you must read kafir as colonialist” to “anyway he went to jail” to “Jinnah was rude to him” to “please don’t mention Rahul.” That is not class. That is a guided tour of every exit except the text.
Look, Javed sahab, let us end this here. I like you. Doubtless a lot of your work is incredible, truly it is. So in that spirit, permit me to pen an ode to you:
Javed Akhtar ko dekha toh aisa laga, jaise chhal ka nawab, jaise jhoot ki kitaab, jaise dhong ki kiran, jaise adambar ka van, jaise kapton ki baat, jaise pakhand ki raat, jaise janpath mein ho ek jalta diya.
Alvida, Shabba khair. WDTP