Aquí el anuncio entero de Nike para el Mundial. Es una absoluta locura. Seguramente el mejor comercial de futbol de todos los tiempos. Vale cada segundo.
@DavidFischer@UnhingedMuppets@grok You’ve absolutely shown up the atheists here. Can you also explain to them that, as grok has explained, since something can’t emerge from nothing then how god came into being.
@ScotlandSky@SkyFootball If he gives this for minimal contact in the box then he also doesn’t give the hearts goal for the potential foul on Welsh. It’s consistent. whether you agree with what amount of contact matters is another discussion but at the end of the day the result is the same. Both or none.
A Labour peer calling on a football club to voluntarily concede a league title they won on the pitch over 38 games, based on a non-binding 2-1 majority opinion from three anonymous individuals with no power to change any result.
The Scottish Sun publishing it as sports journalism.
We have reached the end of the discourse. There is nowhere left to go
Scottish FA KMI Panel, 2025-26 season summary
I've scraped every KMI panel report the Scottish FA has published for 2025-26, all 39 PDFs, 354 individual incidents from August through May, and tallied which clubs the panel ruled for and against. Sick of seeing stats that are basically made up. These are the facts.
This is based entirely on the SFA's own published verdicts and is entirely in the public domain. Checks welcome
Reading the table:
Rangers are the only one of the three with a positive net-correct balance. Upheld on-field calls in their matches went their way more often than against.
Celtic sit at -8. Most upheld decisions in their games went against them.
Hearts are essentially neutral.
On errors specifically (where the panel ruled the ref got it wrong), all three clubs net BENEFIT — Rangers +4, Celtic +2, Hearts +1.
Season-wide: 92.7% of on-field decisions ruled correct by the panel, 7.3% ruled errors.
Definitions:
"Correct FOR" = on-field call went the club's way AND panel agreed
"Correct AGAINST" = call went against the club AND panel agreed
"Errors FOR" = panel found a wrongful call that hurt the club
"Errors AGAINST" = panel found a wrongful call that helped the club
Source: https://t.co/eqWjHmuKVt
@TheQuietKid18 Hilarious that you don’t seem to care about the favourable decisions that hearts got against your team this season. At least 3 or 4 🤣. Not even counting the possible Sterling penalty in the last game too which would have given you a draw 🤣