@USAmbPH MADAM YOUR RULES-BASED ORDER DOES NOT APPLY IN THIS REGION. Here is another crash course for you pertaining to our Mutual Defense Treaty that does not apply in the South China Seas, but only in case of an armed attack. Listen to your predecessors. https://t.co/piJh68N4aN
@USAmbPH In the SCS, the law enforcer is China. The Chinese coast guard applied Non-Lethal Weapons. If you check with your Pentagon, NLWs are accepted norm in civilian law enforcement. The Philippine ships were not in a lawful mission because they were not engaged in innocent passage.
@jaytaryela COLREGS ALLOWS PORTSIDE VESSEL TO ACCELERATE N PASS A SLOW STARBOARD VESSEL just as CCG 21612 did safely maintaining a straight-line passage and establishing a safer forward distance from BRP Cabra. Saan ka ba natuto ng Colregs, JayT, from Fisher Valley College in Taguig?
@jaytaryela MR TARRIELA, WHERE SPECIFICALLY IN UNCLOS AND THE ARBITRAL AWARD DOES IT SAY YOU CAN PATROL THE HIGH SEAS, OUTSIDE OF OUR 12 NAUTICAL MILE - TERRITORIAL SEA? You guys are wasting a lot of fuel charged to the Filipino taxpayers?
Just read your Manila Times article on Ed Ano. Ay naku, cannot help but agree as we were all in one professional family in the NTF-ELCAC under Digong. All I can say is he should already resign while he is still ahead. https://t.co/qLQvwPQMnL
@sliceofdpie6557@globaltimesnews Idiot? Carpio maliciously truncated the Treaty of Washington to fool us it had generic import. The text was specific: "...lying outside the lines described in Article III of that Treaty and particularly to the islands of Cagayan [Mapun], Sulu and Sibutu and their dependencies."
@FACTmebaby@globaltimesnews Go back to the original text, bozo. Carpio deliberately truncated the quotation to hide the inclusions the Treaty of Washington "particularly" referred to. It was not intended to be generic which Carpio wants us to believe. A glaring proof of his intellectual dishonesty!
@FACTmebaby@globaltimesnews Really? Carpio deliberately omitted the rest of the quotation. The Treaty of Washington "particularly" or for that matter specifically referred to islets that were left out in Paris. A glaring case of intellectual dishonesty. That's not good but goofy governance!
@Larry_Acper@jaytaryela Tarriela carelessly quoted Carpio's overthinking. They were improvising their own lexicon on what "particularly" means. Simple case of Intellectual dishonesty. The Treaty of Washington specifically enumerated the islands in southern Philippines that you mentioned, nothing else.
@Larry_Acper@jaytaryela Tarriela cites Carpio's overthinking. These two do not understand English and improvises on the meaning of "particularly". The Treaty of Washington added a few islets that were left out in Paris, and specifically enumerated islands in southernmost PH that you mentioned.
@rapplerdotcom Atin ito? Show me the title besides the treaty lomits we inherited from the US. Nada. UNCLOS did not give us any further sovereignty because that is beyond it jurisdiction. EEZ are just economic rights to harness what's under water. No titles are involved. Atin Ito is horse pucky