@movinisthinking@LuigiCuturi Also note that any given value for beta might correspond to different steepnesses for different forms of the PF (e.g., a logistic with beta = 1 and a cumulative normal with beta = 1 are not equally steep). PS Our forum (https://t.co/UyGFBoPgu2) works better for us, I think...
@movinisthinking@LuigiCuturi Use the code below and play around with values until you get a PF that looks right
myStimulusRange = [-100:1:100];
logBetaValueToTry = -0.5;
plot(myStimulusRange,PAL_Logistic([0 10.^logBetaValueToTry 0 0],myStimulusRange));
@movinisthinking@LuigiCuturi We're not good at tweetering. Tried to create a thread. Not sure whether that worked. Anyway, your stimRange was also to wide. Something like stimRange = linspace(6,14,21) might be more appropriate.
Out now: Easy, bias‐free Bayesian hierarchical modeling of the psychometric function using the Palamedes Toolbox, Behavior Research Methods.
https://t.co/OG3Vutt8R7
Free access: https://t.co/Kr5ItxYzZm