*sternchen•punkt*sternchen

[Simon Elmer @SimonElmer2022]

Since 2016, the Mayor of London has been Sadiq Khan, a second-generation Pakistani immigrant and devout Muslim. The current Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, is also a Pakistani Muslim. The leader of the Scottish Labour Party, Anas Sarwar, is a Pakistani Muslim. There are currently 26 Muslim Members of Parliament, 4 Muslim members of the Scottish Parliament, including the former First Minister of Scotland, Humza Yousaf. 2 members of the Welsh Parliament are Muslim. The Mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, Lutfur Rahman, is a Muslim. The Mayor of the London Borough of Newham, Rokhsana Fiaz, is a Muslim. 2 London Assembly Members are Muslim. 18 peers in the House of Lords are Muslim. And in 2025, at least 8 ceremonial mayors, who do not wield executive power but whose role is to normalise the Islamisation of Britain, were Muslim.

The UK, however, is not only run by its politicians but also by its civil service and the army of administrators at every level of the state apparatus and civil society. Placing a Muslim in charge of Britain’s capital city for a decade is one very obvious way to implement the Islamisation of Britain. Placing a Muslim in the office of Home Secretary is another. Placing a Muslim at the head of Ofsted is another. But the infiltration of the UK state by Muslims goes far beyond the scores of Muslims who now sit at the head of our councils, in the mayoralties of our cities, in our legislature and in the House of Lords.

It’s largely unknown to the general public, but Muslims have created a network of political, civil, military, legal, police, media, educational, health, financial and charitable bodies working towards the Islamisation of the United Kingdom.

Within the UK’s Government and Civil Service there operate today the Home Office Islamic Network (HOIN), the FCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development) Muslim Staff Network, the Civil Service Islamic Society (CSIS), the Civil Service Muslim Network (CSMN) and the Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPACUK).

Within the UK military there operates the Armed Forces Muslim Association (AFMA).

Within the UK judiciary there operate the Association of Muslim Lawyers (AML), the Muslim Lawyers’ Hub and the Muslim Lawyers Action Group (MLAG).

Within the parallel Sharia judiciary there operate the Islamic Sharia Council (ISC), the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (MAT) and the Muslim Law (Sharia) Council.

Within the UK’s police forces there operate the National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP), the Association of Muslim Police (AMP) at the Metropolitan Police, the West Yorkshire Association of Muslim Police (AMP), the Scottish Police Muslim Association (SPMA) and the City of London Police Association of Muslim Police (AMP).

Within UK media there operate the BBC Muslim Network, the Channel 4 Muslim Network, the ITV Muslim Staff Network Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), Muslim Engagement and Development (MEND), the Islam Channel, British Muslim TV, Muslim Television Ahmadiyya International (MTA International), the Ummah Channel, Ahlebait TV and 5Pillars.

Within the UK’s education sector there operate the Muslim Teachers’ Association UK (MTAUK), the Association of Muslim Schools and Institutes (AMSI), the British Muslim Teachers’ Association and the Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS).

Within the UK’s health sector there operate the National Muslim Staff Network (NMSN) and the NHS Muslim Network.

Within the UK’s charities there operate the Islamic Relief UK, Muslim Hands UK, Muslim Aid, Ummah Welfare Trust (UWT), Muslim Global Relief, the National Zakat Foundation (NZF) and the Muslim Charity UK.

And within the parallel Sharia financial system there operate 5 fully Sharia-compliant banks (Al Rayan Bank, Gatehouse Bank, the Bank of London and the Middle East, United Bank Limited and the Ahil United Bank), as well as 25 conventional banks which offer Sharia finance alongside conventional finance.

Other nation-wide Islamic organisations operating in the UK include the Association of British Muslims (AoBM), the British Muslim Network (BMN), the Muslim Association of Britain (MAB), the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and the Islamophobia Response Unit.

In my book I look at how these various Muslim organisations and their financial backers in the Islamic world work together to lobby the UK Government and Members of Parliament to write and pass legislation that furthers the Islamisation of Britain.

The most recent example of the influence of such Muslim groups on UK legislation is the UK Government’s adoption of the definition of anti-Muslim hatred and Islamophobia written by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims. An organisation composed exclusively of Muslims, including 21 Muslim MPs and 5 Muslim Peers, this APPG is funded by the Aziz Foundation, a charity founded in 2015 by Asif Aziz, a Malawi-born Muslim property developer and billionaire whose company, Criterion Capital, has investments worth £6 billion in Britain, and who, since 2024, has been a tax exile in Abu Dhabi.

Another indication of how these Muslim organisations operate closer to the corridors of power — indeed, with the offices stationed off them — is the Civil Service Muslim Network, which lists, among its stated aims, the following:

•Represent, support, connect and champion Muslim civil servants across government.
•Generate a better understanding of Islam within the Civil Service and challenge discrimination and misconceptions.
•Create a network of senior allies who recognise the lived experience of Muslim colleagues and help improve religious literacy and respect.

Doubtless I’m not the only British person who cannot understand why such a network should be required in the UK if Britain is still a secular society rather than one, as I believe, that is already operating under aspects of Sharia law modelled on its implementation in Pakistan; or why it should not only be tolerated but given a place in our civil service, except as a platform — one of many built in Britain and largely with the taxes of the British people — for the Islamisation of Britain.

As for Muslim organisations operating within our police forces and legal system, it is contrary to the principle of police being officers of UK law, the adjudication of courts over sentencing under that law, and of everyone in Britain, irrespective of their religion, being equal before the law. The two-tier policing of the British people, the decades-long cover-up of the Muslim rape-gang network operating in 149 constituencies that we know of across Britain, and the gross travesties of justice handed down by these courts to Muslim rapists, murderers and terrorists is further confirmation that the UK is, indeed, already operating under Sharia law.

Like the UK’s 85 known Sharia Courts, which oversee child marriages in contravention of UK law, these Muslim associations, Muslim societies, Muslim committees, Muslim councils, Muslim non-governmental organisations, Muslim APPGs and Muslim networks have created a civil service, legal system and police force that operates within, but independent from and contrary to, the laws of the UK, which they seek to change through political lobbying of our Parliament and Government. Again, this is consistent with Sections 4 and 14 of Pakistan’s Enforcement of Sharia Act, 1991, according to which ‘Laws [are] to be interpreted in the light of Sharia, and ‘The State shall take adequate measures for the Islamisation of the judicial system.’

Finally — although this list doesn’t approach exhausting the influence of Islam in British society — in addition to these organisations there exists within Britain a terrorist arm with links to the Muslim Brotherhood. This is a transnational Sunni Muslim organisation that was founded in Egypt in 1928 to promote Islam and Sharia Law.

Fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood known to be currently operating in Britain include the Cambridge Education and Training Center Ltd., IMA6INE Ltd., Wembley Tree Ltd., Waslaforall, Future Graduates Ltd., Yas for Investment and Real Estate, Holdco UK Properties Limited and Nafel Capital Partners, all of which have recently been proscribed by the United Arab Emirates as terrorist groups. Indeed, most of the organisations I’ve listed here are linked by varying degrees of separation to the Muslim Council of Britain and the Muslim Association of Britain, which themselves have links to the Muslim Brotherhood.

It is a measure of how far Britain’s Islamisation has advanced that this organisation operates freely in the UK while being banned as a terrorist organisation in many Muslim countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria, Jordan, Kenya, Bahrain, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and the United Arab Emirates, as well as in Russia.

Extraordinarily, in January 2026 the UAE announced that it was excluding UK universities from its approved list for state scholarships, citing the risk of Emirati citizens being radicalised by the Muslim Brotherhood operatng on British campuses. Universities where networks linked to the Muslim Brotherhood are reported to operate include the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) at the University of London, Queen Mary University of London, the University of Birmingham, the University of Manchester, the University of Leeds, the University of Bradford and the University of Newcastle. The same month, the US Department of State proscribed chapters of the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt, Lebanon and Palestine as designated terrorist organisations.

And there are consequences to harbouring and funding Islamic terrorists in the very country against which they launch their attacks. Six years ago, in 2020, there were 43,000 people on MI5’s terrorist watch list. After the mass migration of half a million Muslims to Britain and more than two-and-a-half years of weekly protests against the war in Gaza, the numbers can only have grown since then.

In 2024, Islamic terrorists accounted for 80% of UK police force’s counter-terror caseload. As of 31 March that year, 63% of prisoners in the UK arrested on terrorist-related charges were Islamic terrorists. Muslims have been responsible for 94% of all terrorism deaths, and 88% of terrorism-inflicted injuries, in Britain over the last 25 years. In the last 10 years, the percentages are even higher. One would never guess it from the relentless references to the threat from the mythical ‘far-Right’ by the UK Government and media, but MI5 today lists Islamic terrorism as ‘the most significant threat to the UK by volume’.

As anyone who has lived in Britain since 9/11 knows, this hasn’t happened overnight, and we have repeatedly ignored every warning to the contrary, as we continue to do today. In 2006, when the UK was led by the New Labour Government of Tony Blair and net migration to Britain had increased to over a quarter a million a year, the think-tank, Policy Exchange, published a report titled ‘When Progressives Treat With Reactionaries’, in which it argued that the British Foreign Office had already, in effect, become a front for The Muslim Brotherhood. Twenty years later, they have been proven right. Today, the UK is run by Muslims.

Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you want to know just how far down the path to becoming an Islamic State Britain is, and what we, the British people, can do to stop it, please consider purchasing a copy of my book. The link is below.
https://t.co/kpQBeancvN

[PhilosophiCat @Philosophi_Cat]

@RupertLowe10 Due to the high number of sex offenders and government enablers, instead of bringing back the boring death penalty, might I suggest a return to gladiatorial games?

[Simon Elmer @SimonElmer2022]

For decades now, any observation that the native populations of Britain and Europe are being demographically replaced in our homelands has been dismissed, denied and denounced as a far-Right, White-supremacist conspiracy theory. But as the evidence of the UN programme of replacement migration has now become undeniable, its architects have begun to argue that it is necessary to redress the collapsing birth rates among the White population in Britain and across Europe.

There is, however, nothing natural or inevitable about population decline among White-majority nations. Rather, the decline in our birth-rates is a product of economic forces and ideologies whose harms could be reversed by economic incentives and different ideologies encouraging higher birth rates, rewarding other kinds of behaviours and promoting different values to the ones that have brought us to where we are now.

In 1964, the average number of children per woman in the United Kingdom was 2.762; in 2024 it was 1.41 per woman in England and Wales and 1.25 in Scotland, the lowest rate on record for all three countries. That’s a loss of over 1.3 children for every woman in just 60 years. In 2024, over 3.179 million families out of 19.688 million in Britain (16%) had a single parent, and 83.3% of them had single mothers. 45.7% of single-parent families had an adult child living with them. These figures testify to the breakdown of the nuclear family within which families of two and more children are raised.

Worse still, an astonishing third of males (33.7%) in Britain aged between 20 and 34 were still living with their parents, compared with less than a quarter (22.1%) of females. At the age of 22, these figures rise to an even more astonishing 64.5% of males and 46.9% of females. These are ages at which, several years into a job or after an educational degree, young people would previously have been entering into relationships and starting families, and a measure of the emasculation of British men in Britain today. Indeed, the 2021 Census — since when fertility rates have only dropped further — showed that 37.9% of the population of England and Wales, 18.4 million people, had never been married or in a civil partnership, the highest percentage ever; and 9.1% of adults, 4.4 million people, were divorced.

There is also the influence on fertility rates of the increasing number of non-reproductive relationships and sexualities. According to the 2021 Census, 201,000 people, 0.42% of the population, were in same-sex marriages or civil partnerships. 748,000 people in England and Wales (1.5%) identified as lesbian or gay; 624,000 as bisexual (1.3%); a further 165,000 as some ‘other’ sexual orientation; and 262,000 (0.5%) suffering from gender dysphoria believed they were another sex.

In 2012, across Britain, 1.5% of the population identified as lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB). This rose in just five years to 2.1% in 2017, when double that, 4% of people aged 16-24, identified as LGB. By 2023, this had risen again to 3.8% of the population (4.2 % of men, 3.4% of women), more than double what it was a decade before, 77.2% of whom had never married or formed a civil partnership.

Remarkably, 10.4% of people aged 16-24 identified as lesbian, gay or bisexual in 2023. For women in that age bracket, as distinct from across the age spectrum, this had already risen to 10.6% in 2022, double what it was in 2017 (4.8%), compared to 7.9% of men. In contrast, for those aged over 65, only 0.7% identified as lesbian, gay or bisexual.

In the orthodoxies of woke by which reality is reconfigured in accordance with its principles, this doubling of the LGB population in just ten years is testimony to an increasingly liberal and ‘diverse’ society in which people are more confident about ‘coming out’ as their true selves. As we are constantly told in advertisements for both commodities and politics, the ultimate goal of the individual is to ‘be the real you’. That, however, is not how either sexuality or ideology develop. The UK advertising industry didn’t spend £46.7 billion in 2025 to sell commodities or politics so we can become our true selves, but to become what companies and political parties want us to be: consumers of and voters for their products, especially when that product is us.

The statistics on the number of people in Britain identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, and, in particular, the huge disparity between such identifications in the old and the young — the latter of which are both more targeted by consumer advertising and more susceptible to its effects — point, unmistakably, to the role of ideology in encouraging and rewarding sexual identities that are not directed toward sexual reproduction.

Unfortunately, the Office for National Statistics doesn’t break these figures down by race, but I would guess that, given the homophobia among Black and Asian and particularly Muslim communities in Britain, these figures are likely to be considerably higher among the White population. The percentage of young people, and particularly young women, who, at an age when they would previously be having children, that are instead identifying as lesbian, gay or bisexual, points to a further and rapid decline in the birth rate of the White British population in the future.

There are many reasons for the ‘queering’ of the British population, not least of which is the ease with which an electorate that defines itself not by its politics or actions but by its sexual identity — just like that electorate which defines itself by its race or religion — is manipulated. But this, undeniably, is an ideology promoted in furtherance of a depopulation agenda, and therefore to justify the policy of replacement immigration.

But the promotion of unreproductive sexualities is not the only ideology reducing the birth rates of the White British population. A concerted effort has also been made to terrify potential parents into not having children, or having fewer children, because of the threat of climate change that has been elevated by environmental fundamentalists into a religious apocalypse.

The White British population are, literally, killing their future in order to reduce their carbon footprint and in doing so supposedly ‘saving the planet’. And, indeed, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that a demographic that believes so fervently in its own destruction is a doomed demographic. But, meanwhile, the demographic that is replacing them, particularly from Muslim countries, is having three and even four children per woman.

To recall the figures for a population whose birth rate has dropped to 1.41 children per woman in 2024, 31.8% of all births in England and Wales in 2023 were to non-Britain-born mothers, and 37.3% were born to parents of which either one or both were born outside Britain. In London, a staggering 67.4% of births were to parents of which either one or both were born outside of Britain. And in line with immigration numbers, India remained the most common country of birth for non-Britain-born mothers and fathers, with Pakistan remaining second. Once again, these are the figures of the policy of replacement immigration, not of integration.

But it is also further evidence of an ideology — adhered to with the fervency of religious dogma — targeted at reducing birth rates among the White British population of Britain, and in particular at the young, middle-class women who make up by far the majority of climate activists, while having no impact on immigrants and the children of immigrants from countries with very different religious and cultural beliefs. The future of the British people is being destroyed, just as the activists claim, but it’s not by global warming.

Roger Hallam, for example, the founder of Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil, is the head of a cult promulgating apocalyptic beliefs not shared by the vast majority of the British public; but with funding from globalists intent on impoverishing Britain, his cult has broken UK law with impunity for years, in the commission of which it has terrorised and groomed vulnerable British children into joining its ranks.

Indeed, in many ways this is the middle-class equivalent to the working-class children groomed by Muslim rape gangs over the last five decades. In the guise of courses in ‘nonviolence training’, Hallam and his cult have indoctrinated British children into their apocalyptic beliefs, to which the latter then devote their lives and often ruin their futures with criminal records. The product of their death cult is a generation of hysterical children too afraid of dying to live — for a future they have been told doesn’t exist. At a presentation at the World Web Forum held in Zurich in February 2020, Hallam told his audience of impressionable young followers:

‘What I want you to do is to enter that despair, that self-contempt, that confusion, that feeling of being lost. I want you to look into hell. . . . Only when you look into the eyes of hell are you going to be able to deal with that hell. That’s the guiding philosophy behind Extinction Rebellion.’

In July 2024, Hallam was sentenced to 5 years in prison for conspiracy to cause a public nuisance for coordinating direct action protests on the M25 over four days in November 2022. This was subsequently reduced by the Court of Appeal to 4 years, and in August 2025, Hallam, unlike the protesters against the Islamic terrorist attack in Southport and the rapes by immigrants in Epping and across Britain, was released from prison early.

But Just Stop Oil’s worst crime isn’t their repeated violation of the Highways Act 1980, or even promoting the globalist coup of UK sovereignty in the guise of the UN’s Agenda 2030: it’s their grooming of British children. Because of the freedom of religious belief under Article 9 of the Human Rights Act 1998, there’s no legislation regulating religious cults in Britain, except when it leads to sexual abuse; but we can start by identifying fundamentalist organisations like Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil as such.

It takes a lot to make young people renounce their own future. A middle-class sense of entitlement is the foundation, with their children’s certainty of being right and contempt for other opinions; but this is the product of indoctrination. Is it any surprise that the young, middle-class White girls indoctrinated into such apocalyptic beliefs and self-loathing are not having children; or that the young, middle-class White boys who have taken refuge from the unrelenting attacks on masculinity by dressing in skirts and declaring themselves to be women aren’t fathering them?

So if you’re wondering how and why Muslim fundamentalists from Islamic States that execute homosexuals and categorise women as legal chattel can share platforms provided by London’s Muslim Mayor in Trafalgar Square with environmental fundamentalists from the Green Party and a harem of rent boys who will take over every Western country this July in their annual month-long celebration of non-productive sexualities and child abuse, this is where these seemingly opposed and incompatible ideologies find a common purpose: the genocide of the White race.

[*sternchen•punkt*sternchen @panfratius]

@VulpesPerson

[Morgoth @MorgothsReview]

It used to be that you'd get a little breathing space between immigrant atrocity stories, but these days they shunt into one another and create bottlenecks in the newscycle.

[*sternchen•punkt*sternchen @panfratius]

@collibrie1 @Hofnarr_Der

[the woodlander @thewoodlander1]

Whilst we were distracted, the groundwork for our AI control grid has slowly been growing. The map below shows Data Centers in Britain. Each one of these data centres use up to 5 million gallons of water per day and enough energy to supply 50,000 homes.

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨NEWS: TikTok has BANNED the hashtag ‘WhiteLivesMatter’

The ‘BlackLivesMatter’ hashtag remains in place

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

You can cut one of these robots in half, and both halves keep moving. The severed leg rolls away on its own and can rejoin the group later.

I looked into the guy behind this. Sam Kriegman at Northwestern. In 2020, he built xenobots, tiny living robots made from frog cells, less than a millimeter wide. They could barely scoot around a dish. In 2023, his AI designed a walking robot from scratch in 26 seconds on a regular laptop. Now he’s merged both ideas into one thing, and the paper just dropped in PNAS (one of the top science journals in the world).

Each piece is about two feet long. Two sticks connected by a ball that has a small computer, a battery, and a motor packed inside. One piece by itself can roll around and jump. But snap 2 to 5 of them together, and the AI takes over. It runs a sped-up version of evolution, breeding and killing off virtual body designs until it finds shapes that move well. Some slither like seals. Others hop like kangaroos.

These robots were trained on flat ground inside a simulation, then dropped onto real sand, mud, gravel, tree roots, and uneven bricks. Worked immediately. No tweaks needed.

Scientists have been building snap-together bots since the early 2000s, mostly tested indoors with body shapes picked by humans. Kriegman’s claim in the paper is specific: every legged robot that ever walked outdoors had a body designed by a person. These are the first where the AI picked the body shape, and it actually worked outside.

One detail buried in the data: a single module alone can roll across concrete but can’t handle grass. Only when modules snap together does the group cross every terrain type. That gap between one module and five is where all the capability lives.

[Paul Christian @PauleAluhut]

Für alle Menschen, die die Impfung abgelehnt haben, schaut euch dieses Video ganz genau an und entscheidet selbst❗️

[*sternchen•punkt*sternchen @panfratius]

@grabenbaer Klassische Bärenschuhe!

[*sternchen•punkt*sternchen @panfratius]

@grabenbaer Ich könnte Dir so einen Bär herstellen aus amberfarbigen Glas…. 🤔😎😆

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

When butter was demonised, Unilever sold margarine.

When tallow was demonised, Procter and Gamble sold Crisco.

When eggs were demonised, Kellogg's sold cereal.

When red meat was demonised, Cargill sold soy.

When raw milk was demonised, Nestle sold infant formula.

When leather was demonised, BASF sold PVC.

When wool was demonised, ExxonMobil sold polyester feedstock.

When animal fat was demonised, the seed-oil industry grew from a niche product to the most consumed food ingredient on earth.

Every demonisation of an animal product made a specific group of shareholders very rich.

Every one of those products had been eaten by humans for thousands of years without incident.

The science changed the moment a substitute existed to sell.

Follow the money. The advice will start to make a lot more sense.

[*sternchen•punkt*sternchen @panfratius]

@MartinSellner_ Ich vermute in Wahrheit bist Du eine Katze… 🙃

[*sternchen•punkt*sternchen @panfratius]

@ric_wonders The whale also has brothers and sisters.. 😎

[*sternchen•punkt*sternchen @panfratius]

@MetaP00P https://t.co/T7I6DHQ3YN

[*sternchen•punkt*sternchen @panfratius]

@MetaP00P

[*sternchen•punkt*sternchen @panfratius]

@MetaP00P .

[Blake S. Taylor Investigations 🚫 @YoungGun8140]

Danny Goler shows an experiment where 100’s of people see the same “code” within DMT space using a laser.

[*sternchen•punkt*sternchen @panfratius]

@MetaP00P https://t.co/pU2dWsGMkJ