Python notebooks are great for exploration.
Styled web apps are great for sharing results.
With Mercury, you can have both.
Custom Mercury styles are available on GitHub:
https://t.co/PA6HkDFFtD
Tabular Foundation Models are hot these days, but they can't beat Decision Trees in terms of explainability and interpretation. Checkmate ♟️
I'm working on a new release for our package for interactive tree visualization in Python 🐍 🌳
https://t.co/oabaYdRqLq
Tabular Foundation Models are hot these days, but they can't beat Decision Trees in terms of explainability and interpretation. Checkmate ♟️
I'm working on a new release for our package for interactive tree visualization in Python 🐍 🌳
https://t.co/oabaYdRqLq
The proof came from a general-purpose reasoning model, not a system built specifically to solve math problems or this problem in particular, and represents an important milestone for the math and AI communities.
https://t.co/a0DKbCAWZI
just quick napkin math on how long this took (unless i missed where they said):
the published CoT summary is 111,145 tokens long. it's really hard to say how much they summarized, assume 3x-20x reduction in tokens?
and i'm assuming this is gpt-5.6 pro, so taking Artifical Analysis' benchmark of 51ms tok/sec at 100k input for gpt 5.5. underestimate prob hard to say
this seems a bit low so going to multiply all of this by 2x
then this probably took anywhere between 5 hours to 32 hours. so like $120 - $1000 in gpt 5.5 pro tokens
whole point is not that long for a result of this magnitude!