Have you used the Journal Checker Tool (JCT)?
📋 Share your experience via our quick survey and help us improve how the JCT supports your #OpenAccess publishing decisions.
🌍 Available in English & French
⏰ Closes 21st March
https://t.co/gv67PaGa21
#JournalCheckerTool#Plan_S
As we celebrate the #OAWeek, let's hear from @PLOS on the "How Equitable Is It?" framework and how it will support their efforts to increase equitable participation in Open Science.
More by Roheena Anand here: ✍️https://t.co/am1PJonfcc
#OpenAccess#Equity#HowEquitableIsIt
.@cOAlitionS_OA announces the release of a study on the impact of #Plan_S, 5 years post-launch:
✍️https://t.co/nDlbljaiTj
Conducted by @scidecode, the study highlights how Plan S has opened new paths to full, immediate #OpenAccess. Read more: ➡️https://t.co/Hfli63Y5sy
#ScholComm
Have you tried the "How Equitable Is It?" tool yet? 🤔
You can assess #equity in #ScholComm models, incl. #OpenAccess, pricing transparency, and more.
🖥️ Try the beta version https://t.co/8jZN1QuMir & share your thoughts by 28 Oct https://t.co/wlWhBkeETn
We'd love your input!
Take part in this UNESCO global survey to help shape a global collaborative framework for Diamond Open Access, which in Latin America we call non-commercial open access, it does not charge for reading or publishing in open access. Estimated time: 30´
https://t.co/n7aXmIWH5O
@lorraineestelle from Information Power highlights the importance of creating differentiated pricing models based on country level data. Full document here: https://t.co/Cl9PvkgWps #OASPA2024
Introducing "How Equitable Is It?": a tool to assess #equity in #ScholComm models on key criteria, incl. #OpenAccess, pricing transparency, #OpenResearch.
Developed by the beyond article-based charges working group, chaired by @cOAlitionS_OA@Jisc@PLOS
➡https://t.co/vnJgigAtET
I've seen this piece promoted several times this week, and it's always great to see the academic voice speaking up strongly about the costs and wrong-headedness involved in academic publishing [1/12]
https://t.co/NbsImmhvJm
Join the online #PALOMERA project event 'Developing Institutional Policies for Open Access Books' on 24 September at 15:00 CEST. Sign up here: https://t.co/l5VMtOwiNs #OAbooks
@jeroenson Preprint: https://t.co/yh0fPfzhtQ
Worth a look at some of Patricia's other work: https://t.co/KtqB6gqAnC The comparative study on "quality" within different indexers is interesting.
A big thanks to >11,600 respondents for generously sharing their insights and to @rschconsulting & @cwtsleiden for their outstanding work. See the complete report, and all data sets, at:
➡️https://t.co/RmlEbxE9vp and ➡️https://t.co/L1HacmKLI7 #ResponsiblePublishing
Today, @ESF_news, our host organisation is celebrating its 50th anniversary! 🎉
ESF has been an invaluable partner for cOAlition S, helping make science more accessible and inclusive. Here's to five decades of catalysing research and many more to come! https://t.co/UElBODVbLQ
🌍Understanding the state of Diamond OA publishing across the European Research Area is a key goal in the @DiamasProject.
➡️Read our latest report, the newly-published "National overviews on sustaining institutional publishing in Europe": https://t.co/8fZmxHIF6W
📢 The #DiamondOA Standard (DOAS) is a new resource designed by the @DiamasProject, combining guidelines with a self-assessment tool to promote quality in Diamond #OpenAccess publishing.
Learn more or watch a video demonstration🎥here: https://t.co/kTXLrQzyIA
I have an exhibition on in the Studium at Strasbourg University. It was built and installed by @editions2024. The complete exhibition is on for another week with most of it staying up longer. There are fake books, real books, prints, drawings, comics, signs, jetpacks, robots...
📚 Did you know that #PALOMERA’s Knowledge Base includes >600 #OAbooks related policy documents?
Now, imagine this as a canvas, and your feedback as the paint! 🎨Will you help us color the future of #OpenAccess books?
✍️ Take this survey by 15 June: https://t.co/ZFm68PoSKs