Paritosh arya

[Sanjay Mehta @sanjay250262]

@PMOIndia
@cmohry
@BJP4India
@toi
@Greenopolis89
हम Greenopolis Gurugram sctr 89 के आबंटी अपने सपनों का घर पाने के लिए हर दरवाज़ा खटखटा चुके हैं पर भ्रष्ट Orris Builder हमारे घर दोबारा बेचकर हमें अपने अधिकार से वंचित कर रहा है।यह बुरा सपना कब खत्म होगा?
https://t.co/I7vrbBUs2A

[Prateek Arora @DrPrateekArora]

@gvijayr13 @narendramodi @PMOIndia @Greenopolis89 It's a big blot on the country's nyaya-vyavastha. Despite paying 90% of the money, we still have to prove that we actually paid the money.

[Vijay R @gvijayr13]

@narendramodi https://t.co/iMnbC3gZBT

@PMOIndia Modji ek bear #Greenopolis Sector 89 Gurugram ke 10,000 family members jo pichale 10 Saal se roz Orris aur 3C Builders ka bookamp jhel Rahe hai, Kirpa karke @Greenopolis89 ko Orris or 3C ke jhatko se bachao

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

Thousands of homebuyers. Ten years of fighting. Made to run from one court to another. Hearing after hearing. Dates after dates. Hopes locked in cold storage.
Until the justice seekers themselves are reduced to silence. Thanda forever.
@Greenopolis89 @gurgaon_live @HTGurgaon @IndianExpress
#OneandOnlyGWA #StuckBetweenMiLordAndFraud

[Sanjay Mehta @sanjay250262]

@narendramodi
@NayabSainiBJP
@BJP4India
द्वारका एक्सप्रेसवे का सपना साकार करने पर भाजपा सरकार को बधाई। हम ग्रीनोपोलिस प्रोजेक्ट के आबंटियों के अपने घर पाने के सपने को साकार करवाने हेतु क्या भाजपा भ्रष्ट Orris बिल्डर के खिलाफ कोई कार्यवाही करने में सक्षम है
https://t.co/wY4hrZbCDV

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

As it is clear, the homebuyers are not just up against rogue builders with morals of a mass murderer (50 homebuyers have died waiting for a home), but they are fighting an entire system.

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

10) Judgment Ignores Bank-Backed Tripartite Agreements with 3C Buyers: Thousands of #Greenopolis homebuyers have signed tripartite agreements with banks and 3C, mortgaging their under-construction flats to secure home loans. Hon'ble HC Justice Dharmesh Sharma’s unreasonable ruling allows Orris to hand over these same flats to Orris buyers in Phase 1, wiping out the legal existence of 3C buyers. These are buyers who have paid up to 90% over 10+ years, have active home loans, are now left homeless, and remedy-less. The judgement has mercilessly bulldozed over legally binding contracts between buyers and national banks, opening the door to colossal lawsuits and literally a banking crisis, as this judgement if allowed to stand, will be used as a precedent in all other cases where the builder has cheated the homebuyers out of his money and land.

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

9) ABA explicitly grants 3C authority to receive buyer payments: Clause 4.2 of the ABA clearly states that payments are to be made by the buyer to 3C under the agreed payment plan. How can Orris now claim 3C had no authority to collect, when it endorsed and co-executed the contract enabling those payments?

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

8) CERSAI record lists 3C for Home Loans: The official CERSAI database, used by all banks to record home loan mortgages, shows home loans for #Greenopolis registered under “Orris 3C Greenopolis.” As far as it's known, banks don’t register home loans under a 'contractor’s' name, unless the builder is legally authorised to sell. Does it not question the credibility of the national mortgage database?

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

7) HRERA Registration certificate formally recognises 3C as a co-promoter/developer: A state regulator doesn’t casually records entities as 'promoters' when they are merely 'contractors', does it? And does a 'contractor' ever gets named in a HRERA registration certificate? The judgement simply chose to overlook such basic yet crucial evidence before being delivered.

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

6) ABA clause 8.2(c): Trademark rights jointly held by Orris & 3C: The ABA explicitly states - "The copy right/trademark/property mark and all intellectual property (including the word 'GREENOPOLIS') shall remain vested with both Orris and 3C.” - This clause shows 3C was treated as a co-owner of the brand and Orris’s own signature ratifies this. Can anyone in his right mind grant permanent IP rights to a 'contractor'?

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

5) ABA clause 6.3: Common area Ownership & Transfer vested in 3C - this clause in the ABA clearly states - “All such common areas and facilities shall remain the property of 3C…” and “…until transferred to the resident association in accordance with applicable laws", and "...shall remain the property of 3C..." - How can a 'contractor' hold legal rights of common areas?

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

4) Development Agreement: 3C explicitly granted rights to sell units: “...all rights, interest and entitlements with respect to the implementation, designing, development and construction of the Project, the right to sell 3C Units and the right, authority and license...” - When Orris now claims 3C had “no right to sell or collect,” they’re denying what they themselves authorised in writing. How can one sign away rights in one document and disown them in another?

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

3) Development Agreement: 'Co-Branding' clause- 3C and Orris promoted as joint developers: "Co-branding shall mean ORRIS and 3C with their respective logos to suggest joint development... on all communications including advertisements, brochures, hoardings...” - So, when a homebuyer saw these ads, hoardings or brochures co-branded with 3C and Orris, they were relying on legally sanctioned representations and then made their decision to buy an apartment in the #Greenopolis project in its entirety.

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

2) Development Agreement: 3C part of landholding/legally designated party: In the notarised Development Agreement, 3C is named as the 'Confirming Party' and is collectively referred to with Orris and the landowners as “the Parties.” Clause A states: “The Owners are, jointly and severally, the legal and beneficial owners...of 47.218 acres in Sector 89, Gurgaon..." - This agreement is signed by Orris and 3C and proves 3C as a rights-holding party to the project and not a 'contractor' as declared.

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

1) ABA co-signed by Orris & 3C: Legal acknowledgement of joint role: The Apartment Buyer Agreement isn’t just signed by the buyer and 3C. It has the signatures of Orris, 3C and the landowners, all on the same document. Only a party with legal standing to transact can appear here. This signature page alone rubbishes the contractor argument.

[Soumitra Karnik @SoumitraKarnik]

A LIST OF GLARING EVIDENCE WHICH HON'BLE HC JUDGE DHARMESH SHARMA’S SINGLE-BENCH ORDER BLATANTLY OVERLOOKED IN THE GREENOPOLIS CASE: In the shocking March 2025 judgement, the court stripped almost a thousand homebuyers of their rights by declaring 3C a mere 'contractor' in the #Greenopolis project, ignoring mountains of legal, regulatory & financial evidence🧵
@Greenopolis89

[Sanjay Thapar @Taps1965]

14 years since booking, 5 years since filing a case, 90% payment made and still flat not delivered. Should the judicial system be addressed as honorable or "dishonorable" @narendramodi @ChiefJus @Orris chor hai aur @3c lapata hai. @Greenopolis89

[Paritosh arya @paritosh_arya]

@LiveLawIndia @Greenopolis89 @narendramodi @NayabSainiBJP ji would have briefed you about the condition of @greenoplis Sector 89 #Gurugram 1800 #homeBuyers , 10,000 affected family members because of #builders like #orris and #lotus3c .Homebuyers are waiting for their homes from past 10 years

[Paritosh arya @paritosh_arya]

@LiveLawIndia @Greenopolis89 @narendramodi @NayabSainiBJP ji would have briefed you about the condition of @greenoplis Sector 89 #Gurugram 1800 #homeBuyers , 10,000 affected family members because of #builders like #orris and #lotus3c .Homebuyers are waiting for their homes from past 10 years