"Le règne des grandes entreprises, qu'on appelle communément néoliberalisme, conduit les états à se mettre sous la coupe des multinationales et à se muer en états privatisés et militarises qui s'approprient les biens communs, privatisent nos semences 1/2
Le même cybercriminel qui a piraté la DGFIP revendique une nouvelle cyberattaque... zero logement vacant.
Il affirme détenir des +143M de données...
Aucune confirmation à ce stade mais ça devient grotesque !
La base de données du fichier national des propriétaires immobiliers DataFoncier (2024) serait encore reliée aux impôts !
🇮🇱 An 8-member NBC News crew was reportedly attacked by Israeli settlers wielding clubs while reporting in the West Bank village of Jalud.
According to NBC journalist Nida Ibrahim, the team had just interviewed Palestinians who fled their home following repeated settler violence when they were assaulted.
The attack comes during another surge in West Bank settler violence, with the UN documenting attacks on Palestinians, homes, vehicles and farmland, as well as the displacement of entire communities.
Apparently reporting on the violence now comes with the risk of becoming part of the footage.
Writer: Oliver
🇩🇪 Gigantesque surmortalité cet été en Allemagne : 15 800 décès liés aux canicules successives.
C'est beaucoup plus que pour chacun des précédents étés (autour de 3 000 décès ces dernières années).
1/3
⚡🇫🇷INFO - Un Français touche en moyenne 1 400€ de #retraite après 40 ans de cotisation. Pour atteindre une pension équivalente, un sénateur doit cotiser seulement 2 ans et 2 mois. (Mediapart)
Le pirate qui a frappé la DGFiP cet été est revenu narguer l'administration cette nuit sur X.
Cette fois il affirme que le fichier des propriétaires immobiliers DataFoncier n'était même pas hébergé chez la DGFiP, mais exposé sur l'infrastructure d'un prestataire tiers, Zéro Logement Vacant. Il dit l'avoir simplement téléchargé.
Ce qui est confirmé officiellement à ce jour, c'est l'accès illégitime reconnu par la DGFiP mi-août, environ 678 000 particuliers et professionnels concernés. Le reste, y compris les deux millions de propriétaires du fichier cadastral, reste revendiqué par le pirate sans confirmation de l'administration.
Le vrai sujet n'est plus le volume. C'est qu'un fichier régalien puisse se retrouver accessible depuis l'infrastructure d'un prestataire externe, et qu'on l'apprenne par celui qui l'a pris.
Do you know in 2014, Ukraine needed a loan?
There were two offers on the table:
🔴The IMF dangled a $15 billion lifeline but, as always, it came with strings firmly attached.
-Scrap the ban on private land ownership.
-Slash pensions and subsidies,classic austerity.
🔴Russia also offered $15 billion, no strings attached, no IMF-style conditions, and no neoliberal gutting of the economy.
President Viktor Yanukovych picked the Russian deal.
So what happened?
Washington instigated a coup, ousted the President, and installed a new puppet regime.
The new Ukranian government bent the knee to the IMF, signed off an austerity program and opened the door to privatization.
Now, massive chunks of Ukrainian land,about a third, are in the hands of US giants like BlackRock.
🚨Piers Morgan Has Received Totally 100% Real and Accurate Lesson in Geopolitical History From Jeffrey Sachs
🚨Piers should be congratulated for allowing someone who has something knowledgeable to say to say it.
🚨ENJOY!!!
📑To my mind, this is overwhelmingly about the first issue, is about NATO, because that's been the issue on the table for 30 years.
Territory was not on the table until two years ago.
I think the non-negotiable parts of what Putin is saying,
I would guess really non-negotiable, so we have to think about them, is that NATO will not enlarge to Ukraine,
and I think Crimea is non-negotiable for, Russia's, core security, interests and perceptions and, history.
So I think what's really absolutely core to what President Putin is saying is he would like to stop the war.
🚨He doesn't wanna take over Ukraine.
He doesn't wanna take more of Ukraine.
But what I do think is at the core of this all along was Russia, throughout its history, has always believed in keeping some safety from the West, which has repeatedly invaded, Russia.
And after the end of the Soviet Union in 1991, the US and Germany had said to Gorbachev and to Yeltsin,
🚨"We won't expand NATO one inch eastward."
But then, like always with the United States, they, they lied, they cheated, and they started the expansion.
And then, the Russians, I was, observing this all along.
The first expansions, which were in Central Europe,
didn't come too close to Russia, and they said, "Ugh, we don't like that.
You cheated. You told us no."
But okay, that's Hungary, Poland, and Czech Republic.
That was 1999 under Clinton.
But then it just kept coming and kept coming and kept coming, and they said with rising decibels, and, rising fervor, "Stop coming closer."
And their ultimate red line has been consistent.
It is Ukraine and Georgia.
Why?
🚨 Well, it, it goes back, Piers, to, the British Empire
to, 1853 to 1856, actually to Lord Palmerston.
He had an idea.
🚨Surround Russia in the Black Sea.
🚨Render Russia's fleet in the Black Sea in Sevastopol, which was there in 1853 just like it's, there in 2024.
Render it essentially inoperable.
Control the Dardanelles.
This is a long story.
And, then Russia is a second or third-rate power.
And President Putin is responding to what has been
a British, imperial attempt for, 175 years and a US attempt since 1991, basically to surround Russia with NATO.
And what Putin has been saying is,
"Don't do that. Stop. Leave, Ukraine as a kind of buffer zone."
And Ukraine was perfectly happy with that, and public opinion was perfectly happy with that, and they didn't wanna join NATO.
And in 2009, they elected Viktor Yanukovych, who promised them neutrality, which was the promise that
Ukraine itself had made in declaring its independence,
that they would be permanently a neutral country.
Cause they're in between West and East.
They're in between Europe and Western Europe or European Union and Russia.
So they wanted just, "Okay, we'll be, we'll be neutral."
But then the United States did team up to overthrow Yanukovych in February 2014, and that's when this war started.
That's when Russia, stopped saying, "Well, we'll lease a base in Crimea.
Rather, we'll take back Crimea.
We don't want it to fall into NATO hands," just like, the Tsar did not want, Sevastopol to fall into Palmerston's hands.
So this is basically a long, long story.
I think the rest is negotiable.
I basically think either the US and Europe don't understand what they're doing, which is not impossible,
or they're still on what has been a 30-year neocon agenda, which I know about in detail, which is get NATO all the way to surround Russia, because that was the plan of Zbigniew Brzezinski and Dick Cheney and others going right back to the 1990s.
They still wanna do it, and they think they can still accomplish this.
Okay.
That's where I find your, I wouldn't say trust, I don't think that's the right word, but you seem very reliant on accepting Putin's worldview rather than perhaps the stark reality of the barbarism with which he's executed this war.
🚨Yeah, maybe because I know too much about the United States.
Because the first war in Europe after world War two was the US bombing of Belgrade for 78 days to change borders of a european state.
🚨The idea was to break Serbia, to create Kosovo as an enclave, and then to install Bondsteel, which is the largest NATO base in the Balkans, in the southwest Balkans.
So the US started this under Clinton, that we will
break the borders, we will illegally bomb another country.
We didn't have any UN authority.
This was a, quote, NATO mission to do that.
Then I know the United States went to war repeatedly,
illegally, in what it did in Afghanistan and then what
it did in Iraq and then what it did in Syria, which was the Obama administration, especially Obama and Hillary
Clinton, tasking the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad.
And then what it did with NATO illegally bombing Libya to topple Muammar Gaddafi and then what it did in Kiev in February 2014.
I happened to see some of that with my own eyes.
The US overthrew Yanukovych together with right wing ukrainian military forces.
We overthrew a president.
And what's interesting, by the way, is we overthrew
Yanukovych the day after the European Union representatives had reached an agreement with Yanukovych to have early elections, a government of national unity and a stand down of both sides that was agreed.
The next thing that happens is the opposition, quote unquote, says, we don't agree.
They stormed the government buildings and they deposed Yanukovych.
And within hours, the United States says, yes, we support the new government.
It didn't say, oh, we had an agreement that's unconstitutional what you did.
So we overthrew a government contrary to a
promise that the European Union had made.
And by the way, Russia, the United States,
and the EU were parties to that agreement.
And the United States an
hour afterwards backed the coup.
Okay, so everyone's got a little bit to answer for.
In 2015, the Russians did not say, we want the Donbas back.
They said, peace should come through negotiations.
And negotiations between the ethnic Russians in the
east of Ukraine and this new regime in Kiev led to the Minsk II agreement.
The Minsk II agreement was voted by the UN Security Council unanimously.
It was signed by the government of Ukraine.
It was guaranteed explicitly by Germany and France.
And you know what?
And it's been explained to me in person.
It was laughed at inside the us government.
This is after the UN Security Council unanimously accepted it.
The Ukrainian said, we don't want to give autonomy to the region.
Oh, but that's part of the treaty.
The US told them, don't worry about it.
Angela Merkel explained in Die Zeit in a notorious interview after the 2022 escalation.
She said, oh, you know, we knew that Minsk two was just a holding pattern to give Ukraine time to build its strength.
No, Minsk too was a UN security council unanimously
adopted treaty that was supposed to end the war.
So when it comes to who's trustworthy, who to believe
and so forth, I guess my problem, Piers, is I know the United States government, I know it very well.
I don't trust them for a moment.
I want these two sides actually to sit down in front
of the whole world and say, these are the terms.
Then the world can judge, because we could get
on paper clearly for both sides of the world, we're not going to overthrow governments anymore.
The United States needs to say, we accept this agreement.
The United States needs to say, Russia needs to say,
we're not stepping 1ft farther than whatever the boundary is actually reached and NATO's not going to enlarge.
🛢️Les Etats-Unis et le Venezuela ont annoncé vendredi un accord pétrolier "historique", qui verra Washington prendre le contrôle majoritaire de plus de 65 milliards de barils des réserves de Caracas.
➡️ https://t.co/BcqurA1AYO
Bonjour @PatrickMartin_1 , vous procédez à un renversement de la réalité.
Depuis quarante ans, c’est le @medef qui a réalisé un véritable « hold-up intellectuel et politique ».
Au détriment des finances publiques, de notre protection sociale et des plus démunis.
Qu’on en juge. 🧵
C’est donc cela la TVA dite « sociale » : redistribuer les revenus au profit des cadres supérieurs et des actionnaires, au détriment des plus démunis et des inactifs.
Politique parfaitement inégalitaire, camouflée comme souvent sous une rhétorique trompeuse et une mise en œuvre pernicieuse.
Car cette politique revient précisément à faire baisser les prestations sociales (pensions de retraite, assurance chômage, RSA, etc.) sans le dire, tout en redistribuant les économies ainsi réalisées aux ménages les plus favorisés, sans le dire.
Dans ce cas de figure, au lieu de consacrer une partie de leur salaire au financement de la Sécurité sociale, les travailleurs paieraient une cotisation à des compagnies d’assurance privées : complémentaire santé, épargne retraite, etc.
C’est le modèle américain que je connais bien, ayant vécu 10 ans aux Etats-Unis et produit différents travaux sur ces sujets.
Et le moins que l’on puisse dire c’est que ce modèle n’est pas probant, surtout en matière de santé : coûts prohibitifs, financement inique, inégalités majeures.
28 millions d'Américains n'ont pas accès à l’assurance santé.
Ces baisses de cotisations sociales ont atteint des montants tels qu’elles ne trouvent plus guère de soutien parmi les économistes, même les mieux disposés.
Antoine Bozio et Etienne Wasmer – deux économistes qu’on ne peut pas accuser de gauchisme – concluaient ainsi, dans un rapport commandé par le gouvernement en 2023, que ces exonérations avaient été beaucoup trop loin.
https://t.co/JcI0j1U9MK
💸🇺🇸🇻🇪FLASH INFO - Les Etats-Unis et le Venezuela ont annoncé vendredi un accord pétrolier "historique", qui verra Washington prendre le contrôle majoritaire de plus de 65 milliards de barils des réserves de Caracas.
Souvenez-vous : Maduro répétait que le Venezuela était le seul propriétaire de son pétrole et de ses ressources.
Aujourd’hui, Maduro est détenu dans une prison fédérale américaine, tandis que Washington négocie directement l’avenir des ressources pétrolières du Venezuela.
Si les États-Unis voulaient réellement le bien du peuple vénézuélien, ils respecteraient pleinement la souveraineté du Venezuela et laisseraient les Vénézuéliens décider eux-mêmes de l’avenir de leurs ressources.
🚨 Saisine ARCOM
RadioJ
Motif : Apologie des crimes de guerre, de génocide
Sifaoui dit que la seule solution serait de bombarder Gaza comme les alliés ont bombardé Dresde (terreur de feu) à la fin de WWII.
Aucune contradiction sur plateau.
Infos saisine sur le visuel.
Cette image était diffusée a 7/7. Sur TF1. Il y a 40 ans. Guy Bedos était l’invité. Il demanda a anne Sinclair comment on pourrait oublier ce qu’on avait vu. Cette barbarie. Perso j’ai jamais oublié. Aujourd’hui c juste la même chose puissance mille.
#FREEPALESTİNE