I don’t understand how the right supports this. Crashing out and yelling while Zelenskyy remains calm makes you look fucking weak. I thought Trump and JD Vance were supposed to understand strength. They look like bitch losers
Watching the ghoulish ceremony staged by Hamasbara for the Bibas children; and thinking about all the Gazan children also incinerated by Israeli bombs - can't help but think that Netanyahu and Hamas might deserve each other, but Israelis and Palestinians deserve neither.
the problem is that we don't "randomly cut everything by 10-35%." when it comes to austerity, the first things on the chopping block are always education, healthcare, and aid to the poor. why don't we first try "randomly" chopping corporate welfare and "see what happens?"
@JackPosobiec You yourself said on camera that you wanted to replace democracy with "this" [ostensibly brute force] while holding up a fist and openly admitting that your stated goal for January 6th was to overthrow democracy.
@LauraLoomer this could seem like a "gotcha" if not for the fact that oversight of the FAA and a person's indiscretions in their personal life (as well as whatever consequences they experience in their personal life) are not remotely related. At best you're just playing word association
I know why it is this way, but it frustrates me that political discourse is dominated by shit like “should bad tweets get you fired” and not things like “how to dramatically scale up electricity production to achieve civilizational economic shifts”
@sjs856 IE a chemist and a historian both do research, but for the chemist it's going to consist of observing reactions to understand them on a mathematical and physical level, while a historian cross-references several documents to verify a piece of info. different and non-transferrable
@sjs856 I think the problem is people make up their own definition of research based on "well that sounds right I guess" without any training on how to set and define methodologies, control for variables, and understand that what holds weight as "research" is often specific to each field
@sjs856 then as people run along with their own poorly-realised version of research, things like confirmation bias (and simply not knowing what you're doing) lead people to conclusions they hold very strongly to, even if said conclusions hold zero weight under scrutiny.
@rothschildmd It's such a low-stakes correction to make, too. Like why would you roll with something objectively incorrect when it's a simple matter of clarifying 1) when something happened and 2) who had the job at that point in time.