The parallel extends to Daniel Dennett’s “multiple drafts” model of consciousness, which proposes that the brain processes many interpretations simultaneously, with no single authoritative version.
You cannot consciously observe those voltage vectors. Because you can't observe them, you can't overthink them. You just watch your hand grasp the cup.
Think about your own biology: When you reach for a cup of coffee, your conscious mind (Language) just thinks "Grab coffee." Your motor cortex (Math) fires thousands of complex electrical voltage vectors to your muscles.
Are tech companies too scared to let AI embrace the chaos? Drop your thoughts below—are we ready for an AI that actually dreams rather than just hallucinate? 👇
Part 2 (The Quantum Solution) is coming next. Make sure to follow so you don't miss it! ⚛️🌌
#AGI
Tech companies are obsessed with putting us in predictable little boxes. But from the Three-Body Problem to your brain while you sleep, evolution favors the unpredictable. If we want to fix AI, we have to let it off the leash.
Why does today’s AI still feel kind of… dumb? 🤖🧠 It’s about time we stopped pretending ChatGPT is anywhere near human. 🛑
Here is the massive flaw stopping us from reaching AGI: AI is built on order, but human intelligence thrives on CHAOS. 🌪️
Life is probably the most complex and diverse phenomenon in the universe, manifesting an extraordinary variety of forms, functions and behaviours over an enormous range of scales.
You are a localised perspective within a much larger field of interacting awareness. Brain is not a generator but a part of the interface, like a VR headset worn by consciousness to navigate our particular slice of reality.
If human understanding would be fully equivalent to an algorithm then humans would be bound by the same limitations as formal systems are ( Godel’s incompleteness theorem) while actually they are not.