bakit “biglaan” yung mga kaso???
ano bang gusto nyo — bagalan? dahan-dahan?
edi sori na. bilang kawatan/mamamatay-tao, when po ba ✨preferred✨ date nyong makulong?!?!
“Tigilan na ninyo ang mga paninira at mga kasinungalingan ninyong mga trolls na mga bayaran ng mga kurakot na pulitikong nasa likod ninyo.”
DID HE STUTTER????
PAGSISIGAWAN MO PA YAN SHA SILA, SEN KIKOOOOOOO
Simple lang ito.
Yung kay Leila panahon ng Covid at siya ay nakakulong dahil nag surrender siya sa mga autoridad at nirespeto ang arresting officers. Law abiding.
Si Bato. Walang Covid ngayon, nagtatago at tinakasan ang mga autoridad. Law breaker.
Hindi dapat kinokonsinti ang law breaker.
Huwag magpaloko sa mga nagkukumpara ng langka sa durian.
Tigilan na ninyo ang mga paninira at mga kasinungalingan ninyong mga trolls na mga bayaran ng mga kurakot na pulitikong nasa likod ninyo.
Hindi nyo na kaya lokohin ang taumbayan.
I’d have paid good money to witness tito sotto school rodante marcoleta on the hierarchy of senate motions. That “akala ko ba magaling ka sa rules” ended his conceited, pretentious ass.
I was, as they say, wig-snatched.
Anim na buwan na hindi nagtrabaho habang sumisweldo. Tapos ngayon naman gustong mag-fulltime na work from home?
Hiyang-hiya naman ang mga minimum wage earners sa Pilipinas sa’yo, Sen!
Taumbayan ang nagpapa-sweldo sainyo. Kahit konting kahihiyan man lang sana.
A CHEAP SHOT
Sen. Marcoleta’s attack on Sen. Risa Hontiveros that she did not know the rules because she is not a lawyer is a cheap shot, an argument from arrogance and credentialism at its worst.
One need not be a lawyer to recognize a legal issue. One need not be a doctor to recognize when a person has fever. And one need not be an engineer to recognize a bridge collapsing.
Sen. Risa Hontiveros may not be a lawyer but dismissing her argument on that basis is an attack on her credentials, not a defense of substance.
In public debate, the question is not who speaks. The question is whether what is being said is true.
If Senator Marcoleta disagreed with Senator Hontiveros, then he should answer her arguments, not her profession.
In the end, the irony was impossible to miss. Sen. Marcoleta was defeated by Sen. Sotto, a non-lawyer but knew the rules better.
That is the problem with credentialism. It confuses titles for wisdom and professions for truth.
JOINT STATEMENT ON THE SENATE MINORITY WALKOUT
We strongly condemn what appears to be an attempt to rush a major change in the Senate Rules, especially when several members of the minority still wanted to speak and raise serious questions on the floor.
Bakit kailangang madaliin? Bakit kailangang pigilan ang mga gustong magsalita? Bakit kailangang i-divide ang house kung marami pang senador ang nagtatanong tungkol sa proseso?
Minamadali ba ang rule change na ito dahil gusto nilang maka boto si Senator Bato? At ngayong may mga ulat na may mga majority senators na maaaring arestuhin?
We walked out because what happened on the floor looked less like orderly deliberation. The proposed rule change affects how senators may attend sessions, participate in proceedings and exercise their mandate through remote means, and such a measure should be opened to healthy public debate instead of being rushed by the tyranny of the majority.
We have always welcomed healthy discussions on the floor, but this should mean allowing all members to be heard, not forcing the chamber to move at the speed preferred by the majority.
At the time the motion was taken up, there was no duly constituted Committee on Rules and there was not even an elected Majority Leader who could properly guide a rules amendment through the regular process.
How could there have been any action or discussion before the Committee on Rules when no Committee on Rules has been organized to date?
With due respect, the answer that no Senate rule had been violated does not settle the matter, because the rules cannot be treated as a matter of convenience when the very process for amending them is under serious question.
The timing raises a question that the public deserves to hear debated openly. Kaya pinili naming tumayo at iwan ang majority sa plenary. Kaya kami nagdesisyon to question the quorum and call for adjournment.
If the proposal is truly defensible, then let it pass through the proper route.
We owe it to the people who voted for us to do our mandate. This is why we want more time to discuss this further.
Newly uploaded resolution in current cases involving public interest:
G.R. No. 278747 (Rodrigo Roa Duterte and Senator Ronald Dela Rosa v. Hon. Lucas Bersamin, et al.)
Resolution - https://t.co/6PaIA0Uhmm
Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen - Separate Concurring Opinion -
https://t.co/A9La74JoNz
Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa - Concurring Opinion - https://t.co/at5uQ8Wquk
Associate Justice Ramon Paul L. Hernando - Dissenting Opinion - (full copy to be uploaded as soon as available) https://t.co/3ElBXEnavl
Associate Justice Amy C. Lazaro-Javier - Dissenting Opinion - https://t.co/aqPQvGwtLL
Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting - Dissenting Opinion - https://t.co/y8mVb7hI1g
Associate Justice Rodil V. Zalameda - Separate Concurring Opinion -
https://t.co/MB56m5BpFe
Associate Justice Ricardo R. Rosario - Dissenting Opinion - https://t.co/y9FuaL320r
Associate Justice Antonio T. Kho, Jr. - Dissenting Opinion - https://t.co/hzIb62VaOp
Associate Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh - Concurring Opinion - https://t.co/OyolV8RSrS
Copies of recent decisions and resolutions are regularly uploaded on the Supreme Court website. SCAN the QR Code for the latest uploads.
'LORD HEAL OUR LAND AS WE HUMBLE OURSELVES AND PRAYED'
'Yan ang dalangin ni Bishop Oriel Ballano sa ibinahagi niyang video kasama sina Senate President Alan Peter Cayetano, Sen. Jinggoy Estrada, at Sen. Mark Villar.
SENATE SCENE: Raw footage of Senate beat reporters running, recording and asking questions should send a strong message to audiences. Responsible journalism trumps hyperpartisan vlogging/content creation. Delivering the news is hard work. Truth-telling should be valued.
Imagine their group once called you a political prostitute and yet you prostituted yourself (again) for them? You are hopeless and have no legacy - including from your previous profession - to speak of.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is exactly why political dynasties should not be allowed, especially in a chamber of only 24 members, and numbers game ang labanan.
IMPEACHED! 255 VOTES IN FAVOR. The Senate now must fulfill its constitutional duty to convene forthwith as an impeachment court once the Articles of Impeachment are transmitted.