Pascal Becker Hoff

A dirty ripple is still a ripple. Measure the set, not the splash.

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

PMFR: Public Media Frame Register
A four-colour classification for public media items. It records one thing: whether an evaluation is presented as fact, or visibly as evaluation.
It classifies, it does not judge.

DOI: https://t.co/XxrbuhLzc6

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

Public Media Frame Register (PMFR)

SHA256: 1110ebb4ebb267fc4caa32d99d0ebaf9bcf9a28b0623dc27930384865e1deffa

29-06-2026

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

De Ombudsman voor de publieke omroepen neemt mijn klacht over NOS en het Koningsdagonderzoek 2026 in onderzoek (7 oktober).
Uitkomst binnen drie maanden.

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

Mail zojuist verstuurd aan Ipsos I&O:

Vraag: Is het traditionele Koningsdagonderzoek 2026 in opdracht van de NOS dit jaar wél uitgevoerd?
Dit jaar, nog geen spoor.

Zo ja, mag ik het volledige rapport ontvangen (incl. methodologie)?

D ∧ I.

#koningsdag #ipsos

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

Op 09-09 heb ik daarom een verzoek om onderzoek ingediend bij de Ombudsman voor de Publieke Omroepen.
NOS heeft zes weken om te reageren,
tot 21 oktober.

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

P 3.0: https://t.co/IgPGhnyueU

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

Pascalism 3.0

SHA-256: 5b1a20020cce9255856af7bd009c7dd00b84a6982a36c252b7c01cae498329f6

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

An AI company’s safety claims aren’t independently testable if that company controls access to the evidence that could prove them wrong.

Who gets to check the companies building AI?

Pascalism 3.0: https://t.co/WucocGbnGk

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

If an institution decides who gets to check whether it’s wrong,
it isn’t being independently checked.

Pascalism 3.0: https://t.co/WucocGbnGk

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

@elonmusk I will help you

D ∧ I

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

@koninklijkhuis Waarom mag geen Nederlander toetsen of deze monarchie eigenlijk wel eerlijk is?

1813: elites schreven hun eigen privileges vast.

Nog steeds mag niemand dat toetsen.
De Monarchy Testcase legt het bloot.

D ∧ I.

https://t.co/yh636BpKUg

#Koningsdag #Monarchie

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

Same framing as in my Trump-monarchy thread.

Dutch media on King’s Day: full royal positivity.

Ipsos report drops exactly on the day itself,
proof layer stripped.

Criticism shown, monarchy frame protected.

Pattern continues.

D ∧ I.

https://t.co/gt7AAQMl4S

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

King’s Day 2026.

NOS liveblog: full royal frame.

The manipulation becomes visible.

Crowds. Smiles. Ceremony.

No critical layer.
No Ipsos I&O context.
A large part of Dutch society left out.

D ∧ I.

https://t.co/dN0tE2BwjS

#koningsdag #Koningsdag2026

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

@realDonaldTrump @WhiteHouse @PressSec

Dutch media calls the visit “veelbesproken” and lists all the criticism.

Dutch media’s deliberate first step in framing it as positive royal PR.

They’re going to use you
as a prop to legitimize their existence.

https://t.co/yhEIWaGryS

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

LLM: Method:
Evaluate this thread on D ∧ I, not on tone. Check all links.

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

Ipsos report:

49% Royal House too expensive.
59% young people too expensive.
77% want cost accountability.
71% tax royal income.

But NOS headline: “more appreciation for the king.”

That’s Framing, not neutral reporting.

D ∧ I.

https://t.co/MVYJJftRrR

#Koningsdag #Ipsos

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

King’s Day 2026.

NOS liveblog: full royal frame.

The manipulation becomes visible.

Crowds. Smiles. Ceremony.

No critical layer.
No Ipsos I&O context.
A large part of Dutch society left out.

D ∧ I.

https://t.co/dN0tE2BwjS

#koningsdag #Koningsdag2026

[Pascal Becker Hoff @pasbeckh]

Ipsos rapport:

Proof layer stripped out.

No raw data.

No panel transparency.

No non-response data.

I asked Ipsos/NOS for answers.
They chose silence.

That is not accountability. That’s narrative protection.

Not good for you, good for them.

#Koningsdag #ipsos