Dvar

[Dvar @pashuteyid]

אם ה' לא ישמור עיר, שווא שקד שומר.

[Dvar @pashuteyid]

@YossiGestetner Even worse with Gett

[Dvar @pashuteyid]

@BeckyNYC212 @VerminusM והגית בו יומם וילה - יהושע פרק א

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

I tuned into Joe Rogan yesterday and heard Bernie Sanders' economics, Barack Obama's foreign policy, and Ro Khanna's conspiracy theories.

And then I realized JD Vance was talking.

I want a candidate in 2028 who doesn't mirror the Democrats -- and who can win.

Mr. VP, this is not the way.
https://t.co/VcoYxzy89K

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

With immeasurable thanks to God, we’re proud to announce the addition of baby number 5 to the Shapiro family this morning!

[Lindsey Graham @LindseyGrahamSC]

Statement from the Office of U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina).

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

See, here's the thing: I don't really care about personal drama.

I've said repeatedly that Charlie and I weren't best friends. Maybe you were best friends with Charlie. Maybe not. I don’t know, nor do I care.

For ten months, you’ve been slandering Charlie's wife, his friends, and all of the people he worked with. You're working to acquit his murderer.

You're spreading conspiratorial poison for cash.

That’s something anyone of decency should condemn.

The fact that so many are unwilling to do so is demonstrative of widespread cowardice, stupidity, wickedness...or all three.
https://t.co/MBBTs8kJEJ

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

Candace Owens is an IQ test. If you watch Candace and come away thinking that you are smarter, better informed, or more moral...you are retarded. If you echo or excuse her evil and vicious stupidity...you are worse than retarded.

Don't be retarded.

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

Candace Owens' isn't interested in "uncovering the truth" about Charlie's murder. She's generating smoke so that people will believe there's a fire -- about Erika, TPUSA, etc. This is evil. And it's working. She's poisoning brains at scale. Resist the conspiratorial arsenic.

https://t.co/IrslimpjAf

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

Here's the amazing thing about written agreements: they are comprised of words we can all read and then form opinions about! It's really neat! So release the MOU text. Now. Don't keep it secret and then complain that people aren't trusting your version of events.

[Turning Point USA @TPUSA]

Hey @RealCandaceO, the video is real (as you apparently have known for 7 months)! Charlie wasn’t kidding. Your obsession is unhinged!

Hope that takes care of your show prep for the next couple of days. Welcome back to the greatest country on the planet.

P.S. That’s 3 questions, comrade. Onward 🇺🇸

[Dvar @pashuteyid]

@sentdefender Same in Jlm. Loud explosions overhead

[Israel Defense Forces @IDF]

The Israeli Air Force struck military targets belonging to the Iranian terror regime in western and central Iran a short while ago.

[Dvar @pashuteyid]

@YWNReporter But somehow LBA is the issue...

[Jeff Bezos @JeffBezos]

Thank you. The important part is zeroing out taxes on the bottom half. Best way to put money in someone’s pocket is to not take it out in the first place. Bottom half is only 3% of total tax revenue. But it’s very meaningful to that person. Zero it out.

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

All the haters can kiss my ass

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

Lies. Billionaires get rich by innovating and risk-taking, offering new and better goods and services at prices people are willing to pay. Government makes cash through confiscation. AOC's conspiratorial, envious view of the world leads to impoverishment and tyranny.

[Luke Rosiak @lukerosiak]

You've heard about this story. Now you get to see it.

I traveled to Columbus, Ohio, and witnessed the most egregious government waste I've seen in my 20 years as an investigative reporter.

This has been going on for years, and you've been paying for it.

Take a look⬇️

[Jeremy Boreing @JeremyDBoreing]

The video is Prime Candace. Every manipulative rhetorical technique in the books.

She makes roughly 236 claims in roughly 30 minutes in what is probably one of the most concise examples of a Gish gallop I have ever seen. A Gish gallop is firing off so many claims in rapid succession your opponent can’t possibly address them all. Even if every claim is wrong, the preponderance of false claims produces the impression of a devastating case.

Coupled with Brandolini’s Law, which posits that the amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it.

The whole process is meant to make the accused look crazy for even trying.

Candace uses rhetorical sleight of hand to accuse me of accusing her husband of lying on his immigration documents.

I might respond that I’ve never made any such claim.

But Candace has already suggested I’m working with Laura Loomer to launder the accusation against her.

I might respond that I haven’t spoken privately to Laura Loomer in years.

But Candace has already moved on to say that I’m coordinating with Ben Shapiro to launder ideas to Laura Loomer.

So I might respond that I haven’t spoken to Ben Shapiro in over a year, other than a single text exchange when Charlie died.

But Candace has already moved on to calling me a creep.

Each of my responses, by the way, will be immediately attacked in its own right. Candace’s audience will insist her accusation is true, even though she has offered no proof, and will likewise demand I provide proof of my counter claim. Asymmetric skepticism and burden shifting.

I will not be able to prove that I didn’t make a claim, because one cannot prove a negative. Sure, they won’t be able to show any proof that I did make such a claim, but no burden of proof applies to them.

Show us your texts! You must have deleted the texts! You had a stupid haircut as a child!

The over 200 accusations scale with your answers. Answering one doesn't drop the total to 235 – it scales it up exponentially, because your answer becomes the source of a new onslaught of charges from Candace and her legion.

Pretty soon, not only is the sheer number of accusations condemning, but the sheer number of accusers becomes proof that Candace is winning! Vox populi, vox Dei!

Trying to defend yourself against such madness is madness. It’s like trying to nail Jello to a wall.

You might think there is one claim I simply have to address: That a Daily Wire employee was arrested for sex crimes involving a minor.

But while that accusation is terrible, it has nothing to do with me. As the document Candace posted makes clear, this person was arrested in May of 2025. I left the company in March of 2025. Whatever actions the company did or didn’t take when it learned of the situation, I was not a part of it.

To be honest, I’m not actually sure what Candace is accusing me of, other than her deeply twisted statement that “people who support Israel will also protect the Epstein class of pedophiles.”

Protect how?

What exactly am I being accused of? I would ask Candace to state her allegations clearly and specifically. Otherwise, I choose door number three.

By the way, if you employ enough people, you will inevitably employ some terrible ones. Hell, I once employed Candace Owens! Employees are people. If you have enough of them, you have all of the different kinds of people there are. Some will even be criminals, and you will have to fire them, which is what I’m guessing the Daily Wire did in this case.

Other than that, I have nothing to say to Candace. She invited me to come on her show to talk about George, but I have nothing to say about George at all. She invited me to talk about this person she says committed this terrible crime, but an hour of “Have you stopped beating your wife,” guilt-by-association slander isn’t my idea of a good time.

And I may not be the smartest person in media, but I’m just sophisticated enough to know you can’t have a good-faith conversation with someone who uses rhetoric in such dishonest ways. Candace doesn’t want to talk; she wants to overwhelm me with so many allegations and insinuations, so much projection and presupposition and false consensus signaling that her audience builds a negative narrative about me – whatever negative narrative sticks!

I see no reason to engage in that kind of spectacle.

Also, my audience is rightly concerned for my safety if I go to Candace’s studio.

[Dvar @pashuteyid]

@lawyer_memes If he's only ordering a spicy tuna roll when he has a $45 allowance, he doesn't understand fully how to bill every available penny.

Fire him.