@jbaruch@shipilev Depends on what you call "trust". I would say that people default to "trust by convinience": It's better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally" aka "nobody gets fired for buying IBM".
@shipilev And the best way to do so would be to blame some local tech cause, like the language or any other low level nuances. I. e. «all this technical stuff is very complex, shit happens, we remain committed to delivering the best in class security products».
@shipilev Look at the CS website, product datasheets etc. It's pure, rafinated BS, and those people with enormous purchase power have been buying it in industrial quantities for years. What they're looking for now is a type of postmortem which would cover their butts.
@shipilev That's all absolutely right but for the FUD trading industry professionals it sounds like an old man's ranting. I bet we won't see a good PM here, given all they've published so far, their external communications don't understand all this, they're playing a poker face game.
@bouyguestelecom gagne le premier prix au concours de foutage de gueule. Le spam dit 9.99 pour 130, tu cliques "allons-y !!" et hop, malgré les 2 points d'exclamation, en fait non, c'est 9.99 pour 90 ou 11.99 pour 130.
@corbtt@Jessassin Strange assumption in many ways. Google was not the 1st to invent websearch, Microsoft not the 1st to invent an OS etc etc. 1.5 years after chatGPT release, we have at least half a dozen of similar products. And no business model apart "buy more GPU now, we'll figure out later".
@door7302 Pas rocket science de corréler tout ça pour comprendre que vous êtes en train de prendre un verre et parler tous de la même chose. Surtout que false positif coute rien, ils ont qu'à monter cette pub à tous les gens dans le même quartier.
@door7302 Tu n'as pas fait le recherche ni avant ni pendant ni après mais tes potes avec qui tu discutais si. Avec certains tu es connecté sur FB, d'autres sont juste physiquement à côté, ce que FB voit aussi. Moyen que vous êtes aussi branché sur le même WiFi etc etc etc.
@Grady_Booch And it needs a hell lot less of energy to operate and takes several orders of magnitude less place than the artificial neuron networks which we can build today. Despite all the nanotech available to humanity, it's not even comparable. The gap is unbelievably huge.
@positivecreep I agree but LLM have been around for a little while. ChatGPT is a bold milestone for the popular understanding of “AI”, an illustration but not such a big deal as a tech breakthrough. The most important achievement of LLM so far is probably the protein folding, happened in 2020.
@positivecreep Now everybody is very enthusiastic about LLM because of chatgpt but from the business and technology break-through PoV the outcome as of today is modest. Not zero but far from the overheated expectations.
@positivecreep Yes with the only nuance of "when". 10-15 years ago, self-driving cars should have pushed human driven cars out of the business in a few years time.
@Grady_Booch Not sure about Ilya himself but, no doubt, this sort of crystal ball analysis, predictions and commentatorship on the future of AI and how it will impact humanity can be successfully replaced by an LLM right now with no impact on the product quality.
@Adrien_Girot Ouais, à l'époque des petites stations familiales face aux géants pétroliers ça avait peut être plus de sens (et encore, ça ne les a pas sauvé, comme on le voit). Là, quand ce n'est est que des grandes chaînes, ça ferait pas de mal s'ils tentent de « tuer » chacun les autres.
@IDFmobilites franchement les gars à un moment quand on prend l'argent, il faut que ça marche. Là le Navigo dématérialisé c'est la cata, à 84 balles par mois je ne sais jamais si je peux prendre mon RER parce que votre tambouille est cassée littéralement une fois sur deux.