a lot of discourse boils down to the fact that misogyny is not seem as a legitimate form of oppression by majority of people. none of the statements said by feminists in the past few days would be controversial if they were said about race or class or religion
This is naive. Radical feminists already dismissed these superficial gestures in the 80s. Men who cry also commit acts of violence against women. Combating male violence requires consequences, female political and judicial power, and men policing eachothers rape culture behavior.
like a ban on publicly available video generation models because the social cost is too high, giving every person ownership of their likeness, the distribution of freely available detectors of ai-generated text to ensure transparency in academia
once a new piece of tech has been created, there's no going back to uncreate it or "pull the plug" as many of you say. all the effort you guys put into pre-chatgpt nostalgia and baudrillard thinkpieces should be put into demanding legislative restrictions on its use
There are cultures where it is socially acceptable for men to openly weep and kiss/hug each other. They are some of the cultures with the least rights for women in the world.
You are deeply deluded about the nature of why men mistreat women.
After a certain age you are no longer the product of your environment or how you were raised. It becomes a personal choice to live the way you do and at a certain point blaming your past becomes a distraction at ur future. Growth is your decision.
@RayFromNYCity pakistanis didn't force the migration, congress leaders agreed to mountbatten's partition plan too, and muslims migrated in large numbers as well. and the majority of pakistan's current population is indigenous to the land, so how are they occupying it?
@OneTrueMavx2 no state should be running on remmitances only, what will happen if harsh anti immigration policies are implemented and overseas pakistanis are deported back? what about developing our own industries to meet local demand and ramp up exports?
nothing gives brainless like projecting western social issues on our socity knowing damn well we're overpopulated with a gigantic dependent population (kids). the solution is to tell those dependents to actually build something for the economy instead of marrying at 18+
@pastaaqueen No marriage = less fertility rate
Less fertility rate = less human capital that can be generated
Pak doesn't have that leverage of first world countries like USA where gap can be filled with immigrants most of economy is based on foreign remittence
I think ppl get offended when you aren't ashamed of things that they were taught to be ashamed of. They resent you for not caring what everybody thinks.
@glittersnot i've felt this for a long time too. whenver i come across a bright and hardworking young person who is rightwing, i can't help but wonder if it was the left's "you're not one of us if you try to climb out of oppression instead of wallowing in it" attitude that drove them away
every brown daughter's canon event is realising she can never compete with her brother for her parents' affection and forgiveness no matter what, and the sooner she learns this the more heartbreak she'll save herself from
and churning out even more dependents. our fertility rate is not even close to slipping too low after one generation of decentering shaadi as a life goal