A child scolds a poor coconut vendor, who sells door to door trying to make ends meet in scorching Indian summers, to “take back his plastic,” while adults celebrate it as “standing up to a grown-up.”
Then the mother of the said child appears on camera, fully decked out in 20+ makeup products for that perfect dewy glow… Guess what those products are sold in? You guessed it right — plastic packaging!
This is what insulated privilege looks like.
The conspiracy framing is a strawman that distracts from the actual structural argument. Intent and outcome are different things, and the outcome data, charted here, is uncomfortable enough to warrant serious engagement.
Look at the India panel. The grass-era bars, all green, all at Silver or Gold level, collapse the moment the turf line is crossed. India won Olympic gold in 1964. Competed for medals in 1968 and 1972 on grass. Then finished seventh at the 1976 Montreal Olympics, the first Games played on artificial turf. Seventh. The chart’s before-after verdict says it plainly: Silver to 5th-8th. That is not a gentle decline meeting a neutral transition. That is a cliff edge that coincides precisely with the surface change.
On maintenance: artificial turf in the 1970s required enormous capital expenditure to install. The claim that it spread because of ease of maintenance describes the experience of wealthy nations who could afford the initial infrastructure, precisely the nations whose bars rise in the bottom two panels after 1976. For India in 1976, building artificial turf pitches at scale was prohibitively expensive. The “easier to maintain” surface created a capital barrier that systematically advantaged rich nations. That is not conspiracy. That is structural economics.
As the chart shows (that’s why it was constructed), Pakistan’s trajectory is identical to India’s. Both subcontinent nations, playing the same grass-bred dribbling system, show the same before-after verdict: Silver on grass, structural decline on turf. Two panels, one pattern. That strengthens the structural case rather than weakening it.
Now look at the bottom two panels. Netherlands and Australia both sat at 4th-level performance through the grass era. After the turf line, both climb consistently toward Silver, the mirror image of what happens in the top row. Same sport. Same rule change. Opposite trajectories. Before-After change: 4th to Silver for both.
Underinvestment was real. Administration was poor. But the more complete question is why investment dried up. When the competitive advantages built over generations were suddenly worth significantly less on a new surface, as every green bar above the turf line makes visible, the motivational and financial architecture around the sport changed too. Cause and effect run in both directions.
Structural outcomes do not require conspirators. They just require systems working as systems do, and this one worked decisively against subcontinent hockey.
The chart does not assert intent. It simply shows what happened, country by country, Olympics by Olympics, surface change by surface change.
This is unbelievable!!!
If you are able to see this tweet, please retweet this tweet first and check my pinned tweets.
I request you all to share it too, as there is mass reporting happening to my posts and account.
@Biohazard3737 More like manipulation. He promised such things on Tesla and didn’t deliver. 20b to 1T in 4 yrs seems impossible - probably wouldn’t achieve half as well.
Spoke to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio this evening. I reiterated India’s strong protest at the attacks by the US Navy in the Gulf that killed three Indian mariners. Such lethal actions against commercial shipping are not justified.
Nobody is getting rich off the SpaceX IPO at $1.75T
The real upside is in 5 smaller space stocks with real moats that almost nobody is watching.
Here’s the list: