🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Thierry Henry on the VAR controversy in Argentina vs Egypt:
🗣️ "Let's explain this calmly, because everyone is shouting, but not everyone is looking at the same incident."
"I've watched the replay several times, and I understand why Egypt feel frustrated. I also understand why Argentina believe the officials got the key decisions right. That's exactly why this debate has become so intense."
"The biggest issue isn't that people disagree. Football has always been full of disagreements. The real issue is consistency."
"When Egypt scored, VAR carried out a detailed review before the goal was eventually ruled out. Whether you agree with that decision or not, the process was thorough."
"The problem is that later in the match, Egypt had penalty appeals that many people expected to receive the same level of scrutiny. Instead, those moments appeared to be resolved much more quickly, and that's where supporters begin asking questions."
"Modern football has accepted VAR because it promises one thing above everything else: consistency. Fans don't expect perfection. Referees are human. But they do expect the same standard to be applied to every team, in every decisive moment."
"If one incident receives an exhaustive review, supporters naturally expect another equally important incident to receive exactly the same attention. When that doesn't happen, controversy becomes inevitable."
"None of this should take away from Argentina's mentality. They showed tremendous character to come back in such a difficult match. That deserves praise."
"At the same time, Egypt also deserve enormous respect. They played with courage, organisation and belief. For long periods they looked capable of producing one of the biggest surprises of the tournament."
"This is why football supporters are still debating the match. Not because Argentina completed a comeback—that happens in football. They're debating whether every decisive incident was judged with the same level of care."
"In the end, the result will remain in the history books. Argentina go through. Egypt go home."
"But the discussion surrounding VAR will continue, because whenever fans believe consistency is missing, the conversation stops being about football and starts being about officiating."
"And that's something nobody wants, because the players—not the referees—should always be the biggest story after a World Cup match."
@bitrise i think your bitrise den agent is down. getting disconnected from self hosted infrastructure and also cant setup a new machine due to error resolving bitrise den agent on amazon s3.
@MoNuhaN@Ardi1360@phyritsand@TorongJohan@evaluasy gausah bahas demo lain, konteksnya di demo ini aja.
kalo ada di demo lain yang beda kasus ya yang digebukin intel yang provokator di demo lain itu dong. bukan bales ke intel lain. wkwkwk
intel yang ini cukup diusir aja kan bisa? sambil dikatain jg oke. gaperlu digebukin. simple.
@Ardi1360@phyritsand@MoNuhaN@TorongJohan@evaluasy ya kalau ketahuan emang salah dia. abis ini dia dipecat jadi intel juga boleh boleh aja. gw setuju kok. bodoh bgt intel kok bisa ketahuan. tp apakah itu jadi pembenaran buat digebukin? aturan dari mana intel ketahuan = boleh digebukin? itu aja pertanyaan gw.
@Ardi1360@phyritsand@MoNuhaN@TorongJohan@evaluasy gw to be honest ga percaya2 amat jg sm isilop.
dan ya memang isilop banyak yang bermasalah.
tapi di CASE INI yang intel digebukin ini udah jelas pure yang salah yang gebukin. karena si intel itu ngga ngelakuin salah apa2 in the first place. beda cerita kalo dia nyerang duluan bro
@Ardi1360@phyritsand@MoNuhaN@TorongJohan@evaluasy bro lu selalu melebar sih to be honest.
bahasannya cuma ke intel yang dikeroyok itu doang. itu dia di situ emang ga provokasi ga nangkep ga mukul. jelas2 dia cuma disitu mantau doang. trus tiba2 digebukin.
kalo ada case lain ya beda bahasan. kalo emg ditangkep intel ya lapor aja.
@Ardi1360@phyritsand@MoNuhaN@TorongJohan@evaluasy udah gw jelasin konteks ga ngapa2in itu maksudnya ga ngapa2in ke pendemo.
ya diusut juga kalau ada yang keroyokan ke jurnalis. adil aja as simple as that. jangan lu ngerasa yang 1 boleh dan yang 1 gakboleh. dua2nya gak boleh. simple. gw netral aja.
@Ardi1360@phyritsand@MoNuhaN@TorongJohan@evaluasy kalo lu ngomong resiko, ya berarti udah resiko juga ngegebukin aparat maka dia bakal pertahanan diri dengan kasih tembakan peringatan. gausah protes dia bawa senjata.
kalau misalnya kemarin ga digebukin juga dia gaakan ngeluarin pistol kali.
@Ardi1360@phyritsand@MoNuhaN@TorongJohan@evaluasy ya maksudnya ga ngapa2in itu konteksnya ga ngapa2in ke orang yang demo kocak. ga provokasi, ga nangkep, ga mukul. bukan literally ga ngapa2in. buset dah.
tanggapan gw ya sama, diusut lah aparat yang mukulin ojol. demonstran yang kemarin mukulin intel juga diusut. jadi adil.
@phyritsand@MoNuhaN@TorongJohan@evaluasy tp btw jawaban lu tetep gak membenarkan ngegebukin intel sih. si intel itu emg diem doang ga ngapa2in. tiba2 digebukin.
@Rakasatria2005@TorongJohan@evaluasy anarkisnya kenapa ke intel? kasian cok tiba2 digebukin. dianya aja ga ngapa2in. masih mending ngerusak pagar DPR dah. atau kalo mau gebukin ya polisi yang beneran nyerang mahasiswa, bukan intel diem tiba2 digebukin.
@aquavitcleo @TorongJohan@evaluasy gaada yang ngelarang demo. memang DPR itu perlu kok didemo karena aturan yg mereka buat. alasan untuk berdemo pun benar. si intel itu sendiri pun ga ngelarang demo. tapi yang dipermasalahin itu anarkis ngeroyok intel. sekian.