Pat Robinson 🇬🇧

Parler @P2atrick
Gab @2trik
GETTR @atrik
Happily married, not looking for titillations. No sex-bots! I'm not buying what you are selling.
#rightleaning

[Pat Robinson 🇬🇧 @patrob1258]

TOGETHER we WILL win our country BACK https://t.co/v6NztRuJOq via @YouTube

[Pat Robinson 🇬🇧 @patrob1258]

@realMaalouf Thus proving his point?

[Declaration of Memes @LibertyCappy]

Are you paying attention yet?

👇👇

[Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sargon_of_Akkad]

Not a single person born in Pakistan should be in the House of Commons.

[Not A Number @myhiddenvalue]

It never stops

[Pat Robinson 🇬🇧 @patrob1258]

@LucyTCWife Will that be the full farce of the law then?

[Jacqui Deevoy @JacquiDeevoy1]

We knew it would happen.

It’s now fully confirmed.

The covid jabs are causing an explosion of fast-developing cancers in people of all ages.

[Raja Miah @recusant_raja]

Oldham Council Demanded I Stop Calling Shabir Ahmed A Paedophile Or Else

Yesterday evening I published the paperwork behind Oldham Council's attempt to silence me, and I think people skimmed past the worst of it. Among the statements their lawyers demanded I stop making was that Shabir Ahmed, ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang and an Oldham Council employee with access to children, is a paedophile.

The man who confirmed instructing those lawyers was Alexander Bougatef. He is now the Council Monitoring Officer, the most senior legal officer in Oldham Council

The letter Alexander Bougatef commissioned from Browne Jacobson listed the things Oldham Council wanted a court to stop me saying. One of them was that Shabir Ahmed is a paedophile.

Shabir Ahmed. The ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang. Convicted of raping and trafficking children. And an Oldham Council employee, in a job that put him near children, which nobody in that building ever intended you to know. There was no press release. There was no statement. I found it, I published it, and Oldham Council's answer was to hire a national law firm to try and stop me repeating it.

The letter demands I refrain from suggesting "without any proper basis" that people connected to the council may be paedophiles. Without any proper basis. The basis was a Crown Court conviction. His lawyers knew that when they typed it, because I had cited the conviction every time I named him. They sent it anyway. I suspect the Council spent tens of thousands of pounds of tax payers money attempted to scare me into silence.

The other man I exposed was Rod Blyth. A Liberal Democrat councillor in this borough for over twenty years, convicted of serious child sexual offences. Twenty years an elected member, and when he was convicted, nothing.

I could find no statement from the council he served. Nothing from GMP. Nothing from the Manchester Evening News, which has never once struggled to find space for my name. A councillor of two decades goes down for child sex offences and it is kept secret from the people of the town that elected him. Hidden from the families that gave him access to their children.

That silence held until I broke it. Go ask Andy Burnham why his police force failed to release a statement. Ask the same of the CPS or the editor of the Manchester Evening News why they helped hide the story until after I exposed it. Let me know what they say.

So count it up. Two convicted paedophiles inside Oldham Council. One on the payroll, one in the chamber. Every institution in this town kept quiet about both of them. I made both public. And the council, instead of launching investigations into whether these men had used their positions to abuse children, reached for its lawyers, and the lawyers were pointed at me.

Think about the choice inside that decision. A convicted child trafficker drew a council wage and the legal department's energy went into the man who said so out loud.

I have the evidence from Bougatef himself that he instructing the law firm that came after me. So do others. He copied it to every councillor in Oldham. They all knew what was being attempted. Not one spoke out. Not one.

This man is now the Monitoring Officer. I call him Backdoor Bougatef because he was appointed without due process into one of the most senior positions in the council. I'll leave it to you to decide how that came to be.

When the National Inquiry comes to Oldham, Alexander Bougatef MUST be called to testify and answer for his actions. Why did he hire a law firm to try and take out an injunction against me for exposing paedophiles within Oldham Council? Of which one of them was Shabir Ahmed.

_________

For 8 years I've exposed how politicians and police covered up the gang rape of working-class White girls by Pakistani grooming gangs. I, with the support of the people of Oldham, led the campaign that forced the National Inquiry. Now, with your help, we will force this inquiry to a place it does not want to go.

As Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham fronted a series of Assurance Reviews of which one was in my hometown of Oldham. It was a cover-up of a cover-up. It tried to bury the truth. Don't believe me? Ask Maggie Oliver. Even she has come to the same conclusion.

Despite Burnham's efforts to help hide what took place, we forced a national inquiry. Whilst previously defending the robustness of his now exposed cover up, Burnham is now trying his best to rewrite the truth of what he really did.

Unfortunately, as of yet, the national inquiry will not investigate Burnham or his actions and his deceit will go unchallenged. We hope to change this before the investigation starts in Oldham.

Once Burnham is in Downing Street, the pressure to protect him will be immense. The institutions that failed these girls will try everything possible not to hold a PM accountable. Much of the press will look away, as always. This is why it is up to us to carry the truth.

Which is why I'm turning this community of readers into something more than what I can manage on my own. We need to grow.

Before Burnham reaches Number 10, Red Wall and the Rabble needs 2,000 more paid subscribers to help grow and become more than a one man operation. With your help, we can do in towns and cities across the country what we have done in Oldham.

Sign Up Here
👉 https://t.co/mZBZnScays

Should we succeed, politicians will go to prison. It is as simple as that. Surely, on this prospect alone, it is worth your support.

Raja 🙏

[Catherine Blaiklock @blaiklockBP]

A robber who stole that much from a bank or a jewellery shop would be looking at 10 years plus.

Social security fraud is theft.

Sentences should be equal or higher than physical theft.

[TruthSeeker01011 @TruthSeek01011]

New goal unlocked: piss off the liberals to the point where they sue me 😂

[Chris Wick @ChrisWickNews]

A handful of witches have their claws sunk deep into your rights, your wallet, and your future — and Europe just bends over and takes it.

They rewrite laws in the dead of night.
They bleed your taxes dry.
They smile for the cameras while the continent slowly castrates itself.
These aren’t leaders.
They’re something older.
Something that feeds on weakness.
220 million men in the EU.

Two hundred and twenty million.
And not four with the spine, the balls, or the balls-to-the-wall courage to drag them out of their gilded seats and take the wheel before the whole ship sinks into the abyss.
How much more will you let them take?

Your money.
Your freedom.
Your sons’ future.

All sacrificed on the altar of “progress” while these smiling hags laugh behind closed doors.

The hour is late.
The rope is tightening.

Where the fuck are the men?

Drop this in every group.

Tag every man with a pulse.
The silence is killing us.

[Jen k 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Jenny_1884]

We pay a fortune each year for our water, it rained for months on end & as soon as we get some hot weather hosepipe bans come into force.

It’s really pathetic that we as a country are surrounded by water & yet we can’t cope with a bit of dry weather.

These water companies need to be investigated to see what they are actually doing with all the money we are giving them.

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

Please let me know when the Labour Government do their press conference on last night’s London riots…
Remember:
“ rioters will face the full force of the law “
@Keir_Starmer 🗣️

[Renée Hoenderkamp @DrHoenderkamp]

Let me help;

Dear Pakistan.

Until you take this child rpaist back you will not get another visa granted nor a penny of international aid.

Yours sincerely

UK

@UKLabour @andyburnham

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Mahmood's New Law Will Not Move Shabir Ahmed an Inch. Pakistan Has Made Sure of That.

Shabana Mahmood will stand up on Monday and announce that Britain has found a way to close the loophole that has kept Shabir Ahmed on these shores. It is a fix over half a century in the making, and it will change almost nothing.

The 1971 exemption that has sheltered Ahmed since his release was always the easier of two problems. Parliament can rewrite its own laws. It cannot rewrite Pakistan's. And Pakistan has no intention of taking him back regardless of what Westminster does. Islamabad disputes that Ahmed is even still its citizen, and has linked any deal over his return, and that of two fellow ringleaders, to a demand that Britain extradite Pakistani political dissidents living here, including a former cabinet minister who would likely face persecution on arrival. This isn't a technical dispute about paperwork. Islamabad has set a price, and Britain cannot pay it without abandoning people to the very regime they fled.

So the loophole was never really the wall. It was the excuse that let both governments avoid saying so. This matters because it reframes what Mahmood is actually doing. She is fixing the one part of this failure that was hers to fix, and leaving the harder truth, that Ahmed may simply stay, untouched. A perfect law passed on Monday still cannot force a foreign government's hand. The Government itself admits as much, briefing that a domestic fix is "confident" while the outcome "is now down to" negotiations with Islamabad it does not control.

Look further back and the loophole starts to look like the last link in a much longer chain, not the first cause. Police failed to tell Oldham council about a serious allegation against Ahmed in 2005. He was arrested in 2008 and freed without charge after a prosecutor decided his victim's evidence was "not credible." He went on offending for two more years before a different prosecutor, Nazir Afzal, finally reopened the case in 2011. A council review later found "serious multiple failures" that, had they not occurred, might have stopped him years earlier. The 1971 Act failed Ahmed's victims last. Everyone else failed them first.

Even prison could not resist him. Ahmed served part of his sentence as an appointed "equality representative," a title Afzal himself likened to putting the wolf in charge of the sheep. The same instinct that let a convicted child rapist run a grooming gang while working as a welfare officer for vulnerable children followed him behind bars and handed him a badge there too.

Chris Philp is right that Labour has adopted, days late, a fix the Conservatives proposed first. That is a fair political jab, but it is also beside the point. Both parties are now competing to close a door that was only ever half the problem. Neither has said plainly what happens if Pakistan simply keeps refusing, as it already has with two of Ahmed's co-conspirators.

Andy Burnham inherits this the moment he takes office. His test was never going to be whether Britain can rewrite one clause of a fifty-five-year-old statute. It is whether his government is willing to use every lever it actually controls. Visa sanctions on Pakistani nationals would be felt immediately and widely, far beyond the handful of officials involved in this case. Suspending or redirecting the tens of millions in aid Britain sends Pakistan each year would cost Islamabad more than any statement of regret has so far. Trade and diplomatic pressure, applied consistently rather than threatened once and dropped, would signal that Britain's patience has limits. None of these levers is comfortable to pull, and each carries its own cost. But a government willing to rewrite domestic law in days should be equally willing to say plainly whether it is prepared to use the tools that might actually work. Passing Mahmood's bill will let ministers say they acted. It will not tell Rochdale whether Ahmed is actually leaving.

[@ChatsWithEm @chatswithem]

STOP SOLAR ON FARMLAND‼️‼️

More like Solar panels destroying huge swathes of farmland and Marxist taxation closing farms at record levels

https://t.co/0z3PSTBT5W

[Donna Louise @DonnaLouise1212]

Right, enough is enough. It's time to unleash the beasts.....🤭

Defend Britain 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

[Resist CBDC 🏁 @Resist_CBDC]

Net Zero isn’t meant to ‘work.’

It's meant to break energy production - to break our economies - to induce scarcity & rationing.

Necessitating UBI via CBDC & Digital ID.

Becoming social credit system.

Benefiting UN, WEF & CCP.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Activist: "Farmers are millionaires sitting on land worth a fortune. They can afford the inheritance tax."

Farmer: "How much did I earn last year?"

Activist: "I don't know. A lot, surely."

Farmer: "Twenty-two thousand. Before the tractor broke."

Activist: "But the land's worth millions."

Farmer: "On paper. I can't eat the field or spend it. The only way to turn it into money is to sell it, and then I'm not a farmer, I'm a bloke who used to have a farm."

Activist: "So sell a corner of it."

Farmer: "A corner doesn't work as a farm. You can't run a suckler herd on the bit that's left after the taxman's had his slice. You sell one field, then the next bill comes, then another field. It ends one way."

Activist: "The land only costs that much because you won't sell it."

Farmer: "It costs that much because a hedge fund three counties over wants it for carbon credits and a footballer wants it for the view. Neither of them has ever calved a cow at three in the morning. They set the price. I get the bill."

Activist: "It's still an asset."

Farmer: "It's a workplace that happens to be expensive. You've decided the value of the shop is the same as the wage of the shopkeeper. Come back in February and watch me not be a millionaire in the rain."

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

Never forget what they stole from you.