Paul Bartlett

Retired Educator, Musician 🇨🇦

[AwareBears @bears_aware]

Guelph, Ontario:

Mad man goes on rampage trying to gain entry to multiple homes.

More than ever before regular Canadians are being put into situations where they must stand up and protect their families and homes. We need castle law now!

[Leading Report @LeadingReport]

ABC, CBS, and NBC have been largely silent in regards to DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s recent declassification regarding Anthony Fauci’s cover-up of the COVID-19 pandemic.

[Russell Brand @rustyrockets]

Never forget.

[Maxime Bernier @MaximeBernier]

THIS MUST NOT BE TOLERATED!

[Rebel News @RebelNewsOnline]

Ezra Levant: Thanks to floor crossers, Carney can now ram through his spy bill

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill.

The answer? It is a direct assault on parliamentary democracy and your freedoms.

Last year, Mark Carney won the election with just 43 percent of the vote. That delivered him 169 seats out of 343 in the House of Commons, three short of the 172 needed for a majority. Canadians deliberately gave him a minority government. Sometimes voters do that on purpose, wanting to keep a politician on a shorter leash and force him to work with Parliament rather than dominate it.

But Carney was not content with the verdict of the electorate. While the political establishment spent years warning that Donald Trump might refuse to accept election results, Carney set about changing his own. By persuading a string of opposition MPs to cross the floor, he secured the majority Canadians had declined to give him at the ballot box.

The obvious question is why? Justin Trudeau governed for nearly a decade without a formal majority, relying on NDP support to pass budgets and survive confidence votes. There was little reason to believe Carney could not have done the same.

Ezra’s answer is that Carney wanted something more than legislative support. He wanted the ability to shut down parliamentary scrutiny itself.

That is now on full display.

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill. The legislation would compel technology companies to retain user data for up to a year and make that information available to government authorities. Civil liberties advocates have raised serious concerns about privacy, government overreach and the expansion of state surveillance powers.

The concerns are hardly theoretical. Canadians have already witnessed a government willing to freeze bank accounts and invoke extraordinary powers during the trucker protests. Mark Carney himself, while living in Europe at the time, wrote in The Globe and Mail that Ottawa should take a harder line against convoy participants and their supporters. It is therefore not surprising that critics view Bill C-22 as part of a broader push toward greater state control.

What makes the situation particularly troubling is not only the substance of the legislation but the manner in which it is being advanced.

The government has introduced a motion declaring that, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-22 will be pushed through Parliament on an accelerated timetable. In plain English, the normal rules are being set aside.

Committee members will have just 30 minutes to complete clause-by-clause consideration of the bill. Any remaining amendments will be deemed moved and voted upon without further debate. The legislation will then move rapidly through report stage and third reading with strictly limited speaking time for opposition parties and virtually no opportunity for extended scrutiny.

For a bill that constitutes one of the most significant expansions of government surveillance powers in Canadian history, Parliament is being afforded remarkably little time to examine the details.

Professor Michael Geist, one of Canada’s leading experts on technology law and digital policy, has publicly criticized the government’s approach. Geist argues that hearings are being cut short, amendments are being rushed through without proper discussion, and the public is being denied the transparency normally expected during the legislative process. His warning is not about partisan politics but about the erosion of parliamentary accountability.

This is why Carney needed those extra seats.

The issue is not merely that opposition MPs crossed the floor. It is what those additional seats are now being used to accomplish. This is a double violation of democratic principles: first, altering the balance of Parliament after voters had already spoken; and second, using that altered balance to restrict Parliament’s ability to debate, amend and scrutinize legislation.

The implications extend beyond a single bill. Across Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Australia, governments are increasingly embracing online surveillance measures, age-verification requirements and expanded regulatory control over digital spaces. These initiatives are almost always presented as necessary protections for children or public safety, yet they also require citizens to surrender more privacy and give governments more information about their online activities.

It is a stark contrast to the vision of technological progress championed by figures such as Elon Musk, who promote innovation, space exploration, artificial intelligence and the expansion of human potential. One approach sees technology as a tool of freedom and advancement. The other increasingly treats it as something to be monitored, regulated and controlled.

This is what an unchecked majority can look like under Mark Carney: Parliament reduced to a rubber stamp, debate curtailed, privacy placed at risk and major legislation rushed through with minimal scrutiny.

Canadians deserve better.

The democratic process only matters if it is respected when it becomes inconvenient. If Parliament is no longer permitted to properly examine legislation, question witnesses or challenge the government of the day, then the institution itself is diminished. That should concern every Canadian regardless of political affiliation.

[Herb Powell @Humanlty1o1]

Canada

Your prime minister was installed. It's true.

He then won the election after having little chance.

Then he made deals to steal a majority.

His biggest accomplishment is enriching his own portfolio.

You are the only nation in the g20 having a recession.

They've shut down debate and are just ramming through bills to become law and entrap you in a digital prison.

And the majority defend it, love it, thank it.

Canada is being fleeced, we're being robbed, and most aren't mad at the people doing it, they're mad at the people seeing it.

[Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 @ezralevant]

SOS @UnderSecPD

Mark Carney undermined the election, bribing enough MPs to cross the floor, to steal a majority, allowing him to ram through censorship bills he otherwise couldn't.

We don't have the tools to stop this Orwellian future, but the U.S. can, through the USMCA.

[ThePersistence @ScottPresler]

Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) Wasn’t Telling The Truth

👉When Sen. Cotton goes on television, he’s actually doing it to be Senate Majority Leader Thune’s mouthpiece👈

How do I know?

Look at who Leader Thune surrounds himself with at pressers: Cotton, Barrasso, & Capito.

Sen. Cotton said that the SAVE America Act does not have 50 votes, which is false.

Senator Mike Lee introduced an amendment to attach the SAVE America Act to budget reconciliation 2.0 & it did garner 50 votes.

This was a direct attack on Senator Mike Lee. You’ll also note that Sen. Cotton even addresses Lee in this clip.

It’s not by mistake.

Cotton was likely instructed to try to sow discord about the SAVE America Act & the architect of the legislation.

Other people won’t tell you this information or spell it out, but I sure as heck will.

[Mary Talley Bowden MD @MaryBowdenMD]

When Dr. Mark Brody sent a cautionary email to his patients urging them to wait for better vaccine data before getting the COVID shots, Rhode Island suspended his license. When forced to choose between renouncing his medical opinion or failing a board-imposed ethics course, he surrendered his license voluntarily, now practicing integrative medicine without prescriptions.

Dr Brody is one of six plaintiffs suing seven medical boards for violating the free speech of physicians whose medical opinions differ from other physicians.

[Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖 @babybeginner]

This woman is so brilliant. So articulate. So educated. She’s a joy to follow. This post about how silence isn’t consensus is spot on. I loved it.

[The HighWire @HighWireTalk]

Del Bigtree traveled to Milan to screen "An Inconvenient Study" and returned with something he didn't expect: firsthand testimony from Italian scientists, doctors, and media insiders confirming that the fear campaign that made Italy the terrifying face of COVID in early 2020 was manufactured, not organic.

The footage of military trucks rolling through Bergamo carrying what the world was told were coffin after coffin became one of the defining images of the pandemic.

Professor Alberto Contri, former board member of RAI Television, Italy's largest public broadcaster, and former president of a national media and advertising nonprofit, was watching from the inside. The trucks carried one coffin each. The incentive structure that made the death count explode was identical to what happened in the United States: hospitals received five times the government reimbursement for a COVID diagnosis over any other, and every doctor who administered a vaccine injection received 80 euros per shot, enough to take a physician from 3,000 euros a month to 20,000.

Some doctors were paid. Others were convinced by television virologists with undisclosed pharmaceutical contracts. When Contri asked Italy's most prominent vaccine advocate on a live talk show whether he had 14 active contracts with pharmaceutical companies, the man removed his earpiece and walked off camera.

Dr. Rosanna Chifari Negri, the first physician in Europe to formally document neurological side effects of the COVID vaccines, told Del this was a pilot project, planned in advance with precision. She is now treating patients in their 40s and 50s with Alzheimer's disease and ALS, conditions she had never seen at those ages before the vaccine rollout. She traces the mechanism to prion-like sequences identified in the vaccine by researchers in Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier's group, and considers the evidence not a belief but a clinical certainty.

Del also sat down with Dr. Alberto Donzelli, who expressed deep appreciation for "An Inconvenient Study" and called for the results to be brought to Italian politicians alongside a request for a replication study conducted by researchers from both sides of the debate

Del closes with a personal note: he is not done reporting on COVID internationally, and will be traveling to Poland, France, and Japan in the coming weeks to continue the investigation. Zero Spike, the team behind augmented NAC, made the Italy trip possible.

[sabine hazan md @SabinehazanMD]

The lies propagated during the pandemic awakened the lioness in me.
In the Senate hearing with @SenRonJohnson, I stood up to expose what so many witnessed firsthand: the fraudulent study that effectively “killed” hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). The media stayed silent.
A legitimate trial on 96,000 patients in just one month? That would have required roughly 10,000 coordinators — a logistical impossibility that exposes the clear fraud.
It takes guts to roar the truth.
Share. Share. Share.
Science cannot be trusted when bogus studies are rushed to publication while rigorous clinical research is retracted by non-medical personnel with competing patents on the microbiome.
We must demand integrity. Patients’ lives depend on it.

[Juno News @junonewscom]

Teresa Buckley shared a story about a yoga instructor who became seriously ill after COVID-19 vaccination.

"Why is everyone quiet? Why is everyone silent?" she asked. "Today we’re not going to do that anymore."

"Canadians are suffering... and it's time to hear from them."

[Santa Trump.. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 @lovetocook12345]

Yes!!!!!

[cbcwatcher @cbcwatcher]

CBC gaslighting to the gaslighting. David Common "this murder has been getting a lot of attention around the world"

No David it wasn't getting any coverage. It only got coverage because of protests. CBC and the collective mainstream media sat on the story and only because of protests that they reporting at all... but are together blaming on "the far right"

Only after the bodycam footage came out did "Prime Minister Keir Starmer says that there are serious questions to be asked about the actions of the police in this case."

Watch the UK Policing Minister, Sarah Jones, literally twist herself up in this story trying stifle the "call to action."

CBC needs to come clean on this story and this isn't the way @davidcommon @brodiefenlon

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

This is a major signal.

The United Nations has scrapped its “worst‑case” climate scenario.

The climate hoax is officially dead.

Our children are still being indoctrinated with this damaging nonsense in school - it’s a form of child abuse.
Please watch and share

[Rebel News Canada @RebelNews_CA]

Canada's governor general quietly locks the country into the WHO's expanded pandemic powers

As the U.S. rejects the revamped, legally binding framework, Canada is full steam ahead with debate or public consultation.

Canada has moved forward without a whisper of debate on the World Health Organization’s latest bid for greater authority over global health emergencies, while the United States outright rejected it.

Earlier this month, Governor General Mary Simon authorized Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand to accept the Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), adopted in Geneva on June 1, 2024.

The decision was sealed through a routine Order in Council. That means that there was no parliamentary vote, no public consultation, and no meaningful provincial input.

Canadians were simply informed after the fact.

This stands in stark contrast to the American position where, under President Trump’s leadership, the U.S. rejected the amendments and withdrew funding from the WHO entirely earlier this year.

These amendments were rushed through the World Health Assembly in May 2024, in spite of the fact that they’re not minor, technical tweaks.

Instead, they serve to strengthen and entrench the WHO’s ability to declare emergencies, coordinate international responses, and pressure sovereign nations toward compliance with whatever they deem necessary.

Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who praised China’s early COVID-19 response in a now-removed report, insists that the updates are merely about “cooperation and collaboration.”

Yet several countries are hesitating, or walking away like the US has.

Canada, as usual, is all in.

With Bill Gates poised as one of the WHO’s largest donors following the US withdrawal, he has repeatedly called for military-style “virus war games” every five years to grade nations on their preparedness.

Canadian government IHR overview even openly list “emergency preparedness and response exercises” as a core way Ottawa meets its IHR obligations.

What began as optional simulations is being baked into the regular cycle of “global health security.”

This is classic incrementalism: quiet, heavily bureaucratic, and loaded with sweeping implications.

During COVID-19, WHO “recommendations” quickly became domestic mandates — lockdowns, mask rules, travel bans, and vaccine passports. Dissent was branded misinformation. Families were divided, livelihoods destroyed, and public trust shattered.

The amended regulations grease the wheels for faster emergency declarations and tighter coordination with global actors, include pharmaceutical interests and mandated intelligence sharing, leaving Ottawa with less room to push back.

The Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) annex could incentivize the hunt for deadly viruses, expand lab risks, and centralize global health power under the World Health Organization, warns Yale graduate Reggie Littlejohn, President of Anti-Globalist International.

Despite Canada being a parliamentary democracy, none of these commitments were brought to the House of Commons for debate or a vote. Yet, Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada continue to champion “global health security,” all while leaving their own pandemic-era failures and outdated regulations unaddressed.

Who, exactly, is guarding Canadian sovereignty and informed consent when the next declared emergency arrives?

Tedros himself has made clear that questioning the official narrative will not be tolerated.

We have lived this story once already. Locking in the framework for round two without transparency or democratic oversight is not prudent governance. Instead, it’s the normalization of the very overreach that eroded Canadian’s civil liberties the first time.

It’s high time that the government commit to prioritizing local accountability over backroom commitments to unelected global bureaucracies funded by pharmaceutical interests.

[Pat Laliberté - La Tribune du peuple @Pat77432407]

QUI EST RÉELLEMENT MISS CARNEY ?

Voici la traduction en français du narratif:

Voici Diana Fox Kearney, née en Grande-Bretagne et élevée dans le privilège.

Son père gérait un riche domaine.

Elle a fréquenté le Marlborough College, l'un des pensionnats les plus élitistes d'Angleterre, la même école que Kate Middleton, princesse de Galles.

Ce n'est pas un milieu de classe moyenne. Il s'agit de la « vieille fortune » britannique.

À Oxford, elle obtient non pas un, mais trois diplômes supérieurs.

Philosophie, politique, économie, relations internationales, économie agricole.

Elle n'est pas seulement l'épouse de Mark Carney, est un membre dûment qualifié de la classe dirigeante mondiale.

C'est à Oxford qu'elle rencontre Carney: deux réseauteurs d'élite, l'un canadien, l'autre proche de l'aristocratie britannique, étudiant tous deux l'économie dans l'une des universités les plus exclusives au monde.

Ils se marient en 1994. Et c'est là que les choses deviennent intéressantes.

La sœur de Diana est Lady Tanya Rotherwick, entrée par mariage dans l'aristocratie britannique.

Son époux, Robin Kayser, est le troisième baron Rotherwick. Ils possèdent Cornbury Park, un domaine privé de 5 000 acres dans l'Oxfordshire, en Angleterre.

C'est dans cette famille que Mark Carney s'est marié.

En 2013, des photos ont émergé d'un festival organisé sur le domaine de Cornbury Park.

Mark et Diana y sont présents, debout près d'eux, Ghislaine Maxwell, condamnée en 2021 pour trafic [d'êtres humains], purge actuellement une peine de 20 ans dans une prison fédérale.

Voici ce que le camp Carney veut vous faire croire : que Maxwell n'était qu'une connaissance croisée par hasard lors d'un événement public.

Mais ce n'était pas un événement public.

Il s'est tenu sur le domaine privé de la sœur de Diana.

Et selon plusieurs rapports, Maxwell était une invitée de longue date de Lady Rotherwick, séjournant fréquemment sur la propriété.

Il ne s'agissait pas d'une rencontre fortuite.

Maxwell était une invitée de la famille.

Carney n'a fait aucune déclaration devant la caméra, aucune réponse directe.

Une source anonyme a géré l'affaire discrètement.

Les médias canadiens ont traité l'information pendant un cycle, puis sont passés à autre chose.

Parlons maintenant de la carrière de Diana.

Après Oxford, elle débute sa carrière avec le gouvernement britannique à Zanzibar, puis enchaîne une série de groupes de réflexion influents.

Vice-présidente en 2020, directrice de la stratégie à l'Institute for Public Policy Research à Londres.

Puis, le monde du climat s'ouvre à elle.

Conseillère principale sur le climat auprès de Beyond Net Zero, un fonds de capital-croissance.

Conseillère principale chez Helios Climate.

Conseillère principale chez Eurasia Group, l'un des cabinets de conseil géopolitique les plus puissants de la planète.

Son mari est simultanément chez Goldman Sachs, puis à la Banque du Canada, puis à la Banque d'Angleterre, puis envoyé spécial de l'ONU pour le climat, puis chez Brookfield Asset Management, le plus grand gestionnaire d'actifs alternatifs au monde, doté d'importants portefeuilles d'investissements climatiques.

Deux personnes, un seul foyer, siégeant à l'intersection de la finance mondiale, de la politique climatique et du conseil géopolitique.

Il s'agit d'une structure de pouvoir planifiée par l'élite mondiale.

Le Canada a élu Mark Carney , mais personne n'a examiné le réseau qui l'accompagnait.

Et dire simplement qu'il est un garçon canadien ordinaire d'Edmonton n'est pas du tout exact.

Alors, comment sommes-nous passés du stratège économique au dirigeant du Canada ?

[Big Popz @BigPopz72]

@GadSaad Suicidal Empathy