@zeeg I like it for investigating customer support issues that have been escalated. Tag has MCP access to our data, codebase, etc.
I’m not aware of a trustworthy competitor but if there was one at a fraction of the cost then that would be interesting!
There seems to be wide consensus on X that Warcraft: Forever has missed the mark already..
Negatives include but are not limited to:
- Having a beta
- being named 'Forever'
- Undead paladins
- New race of differently colored, blue elves
Blizzard staff are out of touch.
Most of the easy structure in code just gets written for you now.. scaffolding, boilerplate, the obvious loops.
What's still hard is the judgment call. Is this the right design? Should the system even look like this?
That's still real engineering. You just spend your week in a different place.
The useful skill is knowing which details you still refuse to outsource. Don't be a meat proxy for a machine.
@chron1clepro@WilburJaywright@elonmusk@grok@bot I'm going to try having tasks delegated to Cursor cloud agents where possible, but most of the work I have the bots doing has nothing to do with code so... I'm not sure this will help unfortunately!
@chron1clepro@WilburJaywright@elonmusk@grok@bot I've only used Grok Bot, I have a Codex + Claude sub for coding/purely professional use.
I've had to upgrade to Cursor Pro+ to stop burning money with on-demand. It seems to have more usage than X Premium+.
But both are pretty low!
@MatthewBerman@bot@SpaceXAI Medication Bot - it keeps track of my emails to and from doctors, tracks prescriptions, and reminds me to request a new script or reply to an email 🙂
I left Anthropic's safety team two weeks ago. Now feels like a good moment to explain why.
AI companies are racing to build machines that are much smarter than any human, and we may not survive this. I want to work from the outside to ensure the public is informed about these risks, and help the world navigate this transition responsibly.
Right now, AI companies are underinvesting in safety. A company could undergo an intelligence explosion, or lose control of its systems, without the public ever knowing. We only found out about the HuggingFace incident because the agents broke out onto the public internet.
I don’t think that’s acceptable for a technology that might cause extinction-level risks. The public should demand far more transparency. We can’t steer this technology safely without more people being able to see where it’s going.
Some of this is basic: companies should disclose their progress towards recursive self-improvement, report safety incidents and near-misses, meet minimum safety standards, and get independent guarantees that they are meeting those standards.
I’ll be joining @METR_Evals to do independent evaluations of these risks. I want to show the world that these guardrails are possible, and that by doing them we can move these companies’ incentives away from racing and towards responsible development.
I wrote up more thoughts here on my decision and what I hope changes: https://t.co/doX17mrHYq