A los usuarios de @Uber_MEX les informo que me acabo de dar cuenta que la app me cobra una membresía mensual $70.00 que JAMAS SOLICITÉ NI ACEPTÉ, es un rollo cancelarla, pero creo que lo logré.
Nomás te cobra SIN AVISAR $840.00 al año.
El servicio es PEOR que el de un taxi de la calle y más fraudulento
¡Alerta en CDMX!⚠️
Una mujer denunció en redes un presunto nuevo modus operandi en la capital que identificó tras el riesgo que vivió su familia.
🛑Los delincuentes usaron a una niña para lanzarle espuma a modo de juego a su hijo, pero después sujetos intentaron llevarse al menor para luego asaltar y agredir a la pareja‼️
The advice for the housing crisis is get roommates.
The advice for grocery costs is cook at home.
The advice for the commute is move closer to work.
The advice for debt is cut spending.
The advice for burnout is find balance.
None of these are solutions.
They are instructions for how to be poor more quietly.
It's funny when people you know in real life, that you know are in entry-level research jobs making s*** money, that you know effectively take zero risk and don't manage any discretionary capital, try to pretend to be big shots on the internet for clout
We aren’t finding enough copper deposits
- 1985-2000: 102 discoveries totaling 632 mt Cu
- 2000-2012: 84 discoveries totaling 419 mt Cu
- 2012-2020: 25 discoveries totaling 120 mt Cu
- 2020-2025: 6 discoveries totaling 12 mt Cu
In other words, we are barely finding new copper mines, and when we do, they are more capital-intensive and smaller than they used to be.
This problem is exacerbated by the fact that fewer and fewer earlier discoveries are getting permitted.
The copper supply-demand model is broken.
Ending this trip with a burrito the last three and half weeks have gone quick that's for sure. Nice to see a replica of the World Cup Trophy here in Cacun and another retro/customed design Football shirt store. #worldcup
The monthly price of $5,000,000 based on starting ages
60 - $64,569
50 - $12,064
40 - $3,768
30 - $1,317
20 - $477
$477 a month to retire with millions? Sign me up.
40 out of 86 Brown students scored a perfect 100 on their midterm. Then the professor moved the final in person, and 22 of those perfect scorers never showed up again.
He'd suspected AI cheating from the start. The take-home midterm was deliberately harder than usual, yet the class averaged 96 when the historical range is 65 to 80. Some answers contained odd phrasing that matched what ChatGPT produced when he ran the questions through it himself.
Roberto Serrano has taught economics at Brown for 34 years. He filed no accusations. He announced the final would be in person, count for half the grade, and that if the two distributions didn't match, the final alone would determine grades.
Then the exodus. 27 students never showed up. 22 of them had perfect midterms. Of the 59 who did show, 19 failed. Several signed the exam and turned it in blank. The average fell from 96 to 48, the lowest in the course's history.
He never needed a plagiarism detector. The cheaters identified themselves by walking away. A grade distribution became a confession.
Here's the part nobody's sitting with. Serrano proved it. He sent the distributions to Brown's dean and provost. The provost never responded. The academic committee's reply amounted to calling it "a wake-up call." The students who bailed before the final walked away clean.
Every university in America is now grading two populations, students and students plus ChatGPT, on one curve. The honest kids in Serrano's class watched a 96 average get set by machines, then sat a real final against it. The cheaters lost nothing. That's the incentive structure now, and it grades itself.