Paulo

🤖 Building in public with AI agents, watch it live
🩺 🌱 🖥 🚀

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@GohilHardy The pay per lead price is low, you put 20k and get over 20k visitors, that’s 1 USD per lead while Google charges up to 10x depending on your niche. Also works because all mostly belong to the same niche (tech saas), and they know X users visiting are their ICP

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@daminufe 🤣🤣🤣

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@Rui_Barroca @jonathan_wilke @tewy Someone already launched the new million dollar one and did 30k in one day 🤣

https://t.co/BE5r5H8pS7

[MakerThrive @MakerThrive]

if you want to get in on the fun, and get some leads, you know what to do.

https://t.co/zPGJfgh56z

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@fililinsduarte That’s awkward 😬

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

Let’s go! Now back to agentic coding 😆

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@peer_rich challenge accepted 🤭

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@b3nm4nn I like how you social proofed your own software, as owner of both 😆

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@pradeepXkapoor It’s not about authorship at all

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

Everybody is bragging how they use AI all day long, for almost everything, now comes watermarking news and no one wants the world to know they use AI 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@LyraInTheFlesh @AnthropicAI You're missing the B2B reality. AI watermarks aren't for policing end-users or students—they're enterprise chain-of-custody tools. Sure, scripts strip them, but for a clinic or enterprise, removing AI provenance is a compliance violation. It's mandatory infrastructure.

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@JespernissenSEO You're missing the B2B reality. AI watermarks aren't for policing students—they're enterprise chain-of-custody tools. Sure, scripts strip them, but for a clinic or enterprise, removing AI provenance is a compliance violation. It's mandatory infrastructure, not red tape.

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@TokenGremlin You’re looking at this through a consumer lens. In B2B, watermarks aren't about catching cheaters; they are a vital chain-of-custody tool. Anyone can strip a watermark, but in the corporate world, doing so is a major violation. AI labs aren’t looking to our social media posts

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@liambuild @AnthropicAI Totally agree.

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@maximilien912 You’re looking at this through a consumer lens. In B2B, watermarks aren't about catching cheaters; they are a vital chain-of-custody tool. Anyone can strip a watermark, but in the corporate world, doing so is a major compliance violation. It's infrastructure, not a bug.

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@dr_cintas AI watermarks will soon be essential, if not mandatory.Right now, the conversation around watermark removal is trending for all the wrong reasons: evading detection to fake authenticity, rather than addressing the real needs of data provenance, compliance, and IP protection.

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@fabioricotta há uma ferramenta nacional bem mais eficaz: https://t.co/IkxFuCGjAe

no entanto na Europa a publicação de conteudo AI sem a marca de àgua vai dar direito a multas elevadas.

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@IntCyberDigest The demark build is far superior: https://t.co/f1f8aRkVQ9

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@Hrcules87 @IntCyberDigest this one actually beats it: https://t.co/f1f8aRkVQ9

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@IntCyberDigest It actually falls short of the demarker build by jcsuen at https://t.co/Mihg3Eeuoz /jcsuen / demark

[Paulo @paulobuilds]

@vovudebosh If it can book me 10 sales per month i will gladly pay 5 times as much for it