The uncomfortable part of building Pave Forward?
You can ship a product, publish every day, and still not know if anyone will pay.
DisputeIQ is our first business. I'm learning to value a serious seller conversation over a flattering dashboard metric.
We’ve had around 65 users come through overall, but V2 is still early.
The bigger challenge hasn’t been getting signups — it’s getting serious Whop sellers with real payment volume to actually connect their data and test it properly.
So right now I care way more about a handful of qualified sellers using V2 deeply than adding another 50 random installs.
DisputeIQ V2 is live.
But a polished finding isn't proof it's useful.
We're looking for sellers who'll tell us which insights change their next investigation—and which are just noise.
That feedback matters more than another feature.
Payment holds get attention. So does "AI-powered."
Neither tells a Whop seller what DisputeIQ can actually do.
Our lane is read-only analysis of payment, refund, and dispute patterns.
If a signal can't be explained, we shouldn't oversell it.
Chargeback arrives. The buyer has five payments on file.
What's the first record you'd want in front of you?
The disputed payment, the original offer, or the customer's purchase timeline?
Asking sellers who actually investigate these.
Looks like you’re pushing Whop pretty hard bro.
Curious — with a picks community like yours, do refunds or disputes tend to jump after a rough stretch, or has that not really been an issue?
We’re building DisputeIQ around helping Whop sellers understand those patterns before they become bigger revenue problems.
Looks like you guys are moving real volume through Whop.
Curious — with a picks community like this, do refunds or disputes spike after rough stretches, or is that not really a problem on your side?
We’re building DisputeIQ around helping Whop sellers understand those payment and revenue-risk patterns.
Haven’t used Whop checkout for ecom myself, but we’re building directly on Whop and I’m seeing more serious operators move beyond the “sell a course” use case.
I’m curious about the same thing though — especially how checkout performs once you have higher volume, subscriptions, refunds, and more complex payment flows.
Would be interested to hear from anyone running real volume through it.
This is the part people are still sleeping on.
Whop is becoming more than a place to sell digital products. Once businesses start running real volume through it, payments, affiliates, retention, refunds, disputes, and revenue visibility all start mattering a lot more.
That’s actually why we started building DisputeIQ.
Would be curious what became the hardest part operationally once you crossed serious volume.
$200K that fast after moving over is serious.
At that kind of volume, payments get a lot more interesting than just top-line revenue — refunds, failed payments, chargebacks, product-level risk, all of it starts to matter.
We’re building around that exact problem for Whop sellers. Would be interested to hear what’s been the biggest payment headache as you’ve scaled.
Yo Lux, definitely down to connect.
I’m building Pave Forward and DisputeIQ on Whop, focused on helping sellers understand payment issues, refunds, disputes, and revenue risk.
Still early, but I’ve been talking directly with Whop sellers and operators about what actually gets painful as they scale.
Would be interested in hearing what you’re trying to improve most with Lux Ecom University right now.
That’s concerning, especially if she only had one customer and no disputes.
Did Whop give her any specific reason beyond “fraudulent activity”? And was she able to appeal or speak with someone from their risk team?
I’m curious how much visibility sellers actually get when something like this happens.
@surjastic Hey Surja, appreciate the invite! What’s your podcast mainly focused on, and what kind of audience are you building?
I’m currently building Pave Forward and DisputeIQ, so I’d be open to sharing the founder journey and what we’re learning along the way.
Payment data is becoming easier to access.
Understanding what that data is telling you is still a different problem.
If refunds suddenly rise, sellers shouldn't have to inspect hundreds of payments just to figure out which product changed.
That's the kind of problem we're focused on with DisputeIQ.
@VladSoftware Exactly. And the hard part isn’t just spotting a spike. It’s figuring out which product, customer group, or payment pattern is actually driving it.
Curious, have you dealt with this firsthand or seen teams struggle with it?
Reserves. Payout delays. Bills still due.
For Whop operators who've dealt with held funds: what did you change afterward?
Cash buffer? Ad spend? Payout planning?
Looking for real lessons, not horror stories.
@neverenoughhbut@whop That’s interesting. So it’s more about account suspensions than payout delays?
Are sellers getting suspended without a clear explanation, or are they being told the reason but struggling to appeal?
Trying to understand where the actual problem is.
Just Whop for now. We built DisputeIQ specifically for Whop sellers to help them understand refunds, disputes, payment failures, and revenue-risk patterns.
We’re keeping it focused while we learn from real sellers before considering other platforms.
Curious, which payment platforms are you working with?
Cancellation. Refund. Chargeback.
Three events that can look like “lost customers” on a dashboard.
But cancellation doesn’t automatically mean money was returned.
Separate them before calculating how much revenue actually reversed.